It is one of the absurdities of the modern Left that they can’t tell shit from chocolate, freedom from oppression, or cocks from cunts.

In the wake of Orwellian calls for Germaine Greer to be denied a platform at Cardiff University because she occasionally takes her meds and ends up saying something sensible about eunuchs not being women, Greer has responded by re-iterating her one sensible stance…

“Just because you lop off your dick and then wear a dress doesn’t make you a fucking woman. I’ve asked my doctor to give me long ears and liver spots and I’m going to wear a brown coat but that won’t turn me into a fucking cocker spaniel.”

I didn’t know a doctor could give you liver spots. And even if they could, one would think that a bat as hoary as Greer would have more than enough of her own already. That temporary lapse into senility aside, Ms Greer is correct. A mutilated male is no more a female than a horse with some white stripes painted on its ass is a zebra. A cock turned inside out is not a vagina. If you think it is, try pumping some semen into it in the hopes of getting some kiddies to pop out. Won’t happen, I tells ya. Why? Because real vaginas have a womb beyond them and, attached to that womb, ovaries that produce eggs to be fertilized by the aforementioned semen. These are very basic biological facts, and it is a testament to the idiocy of what passes for the modern Left that they need to be pointed out.

Greer continued her brief moment of lucidity…

“I do understand that some people are born intersex and they deserve support in coming to terms with their gender but it’s not the same thing. A man who gets his dick chopped off is actually inflicting an extraordinary act of violence on himself.”

Once again, the antediluvian, antipodean, hag gets it right. There’s a huge difference between someone born intersex and choosing to go this way or that and some idiotic freak who can’t tell the difference between a bratwurst and a clam. It’s also refreshing to see a feminist, of all things, describing what these poor bastards do to themselves as an act of violence. ‘Tis a fine sign of how insane the world has become, that a noted man-hater is one of the few willing to say that a man who willingly has his cock and balls hacked off is doing something grotesquely violent to himself. That reality, of course, will be ignored by the other members of the sisterhood, as it not only denies their twisted concept of “what is,” but threatens to rob them of the covert thrill that so many of them get from knowing there are men out there castrating themselves.

But, perhaps showing her age, Greer also shows signs of pussying out…

“I’m not saying that people should not be allowed to go through that procedure, what I’m saying is it doesn’t make them a woman. It happens to be an opinion, it’s not a prohibition.”

No, grandma, the idea that undergoing the procedure does not make one a woman is not an opinion, it is a fact. Unless, of course, one defines woman primarily as a cultural construct, as gender as opposed to sex. In other words, if one thinks society’s input into what makes a woman a woman is more important than nature’s. This is another aspect of the debate that the Left likes to ignore – the way men like Bruce Jenner are enforcing gender restrictions by saying, in effect, that to be feminine is to be female. But the two are not the same. Femaleness is in your DNA, in your body – femininity is in what your culture teaches you. That is why Boudica was both female and, by today’s standards, unfeminine – because the latter is determined by the culture of the time, not by nature. The same, of course, holds for maleness and masculinity.

As a further sign that the old grey mare isn’t what she used to be, Greer also refers to Bruce Jenner as “he/she.” Bruce Jenner is neither woman nor hermaphrodite, so it does look as if even Greer is partly giving in to the pressure to conform to Orwellian definitions of what is and what is not.

But perhaps the most worrying sign in all this is that the wimpy old hag has given her enemies what they want by canceling her appearance at the Uni…

“Bugger it. It’s not that interesting or rewarding.”

Way to go, you tough old bitch! Just shows that, if hit long enough and hard enough, even the anti-pc brigade can be pressured into going along with at least part of the anti-reason, anti-enlightenment claptrap put out there by these so-called Leftists. Still, at least she has put up some resistance, and for that alone I have to say it – Germaine Greer is still a piece of shit, but not quite as big a one as I thought.

As for the whole idea of men “becoming women,” all that needs to be said is – No cunt? No ovaries? No womb? No woman!

Greer dishes out the basic biology right here.

It seems that schools in England are to be given guidelines on what kiddies and teachers can and can’t say to one another. While I might usually condemn this kind of thing as Orwellian ( for example, when it’s some PC bullshit about gendered pronouns or forcing boys to wear pink tutus and hold tea parties for their stuffed animals) in this case I think it a good thing.

For something coming out of a modern education system, the guidelines seem pretty sensible, and unexpectedly pro-male. Amongst the banned crap will be…

Telling boys to “Man up”
Calling boys “sissies”
Calling children or each other “cupcake”
Boys telling girls to “make them a sandwich”
Teachers saying to boys “don’t be a girl”.
Calling girls who study ‘male’ subjects “lesbians”

In a world where praising females and pissing on males is de rigueur, it is refreshing to see a ban not only on telling girls they are dykes for liking math, but also on telling boys to “man up” because they aren’t being the cold, stoic lumps that the plutocrats would like them to be. Kids are incredibly malleable, and such an enforcement of gender stereotypes is bound to have a detrimental effect on them reaching some sort of emotional and intellectual maturity. Hell, this shit works even on men and women, can you imagine how much more powerful it is on the young and impressionable? So to this, I say, “Good! It’s about bloody time!”

Of course, social conservatives are bound to be outraged by this — note, for example, the quotation marks around the word sexist in the linked article’s title! But what else can be expected from people who have oatmeal for brains? Far as I can tell, nobody is going to force kids to do things they don’t want to — nobody is going to force Johnny to play with dolls and Janey to play with trucks, so I don’t see the big deal.

Not surprisingly, the whole thing is being touted as being primarily about the girls because females are always the primary victims of anything bad that happens. Prostate cancer, for example, is an area in which the primary victims are women because many end up with men who are either dead or impotent! This is how our sick, twisted society looks at everything, but we mustn’t let the gynocentric language surrounding the initiative blind us to the potential benefits this will have for boys.

I was especially pleased to see this bit…

“Clare Thomson, of the Institute of Physics, who helped to draw up the guidelines, told The Sunday Times: “Even low-level comments are potentially an issue with teachers using phrases such as ‘man up’.”

It’s good to see that not only are the kids being told to stop being such little shits, so are the teachers. As for the whole “man up” thing, it is as offensive and fucking retarded as it gets. What, a man is less of a man because he doesn’t do what you want him to? His balls drop off if he doesn’t follow your orders, do they? The phrase is pathetic even when used on a man, but on a boy? Why the fuck should he “man up” when he isn’t even a man!?!?! He’s a boy, a child, and he has the right to be so without some piece of shit trying to shame him into being something he is not.

The news isn’t all good, hence the title of this post, as some schools have decided to enforce these new guidelines by setting up squads of little feminazis to go around harassing kids who break the rules. How’s that for the modern definition of sexual equality? Only the girls get to police the new rules, and who do you think they will go after more eagerly – the boy jerks or the girl jerks? Can you imagine if this was about racism these schools appointing white-only groups to police it? These particular schools, wherever they are, are clearly being run by sexist, anti-male, white-knighting dweebs who should be fired so they can go do something that involves less power over the young. Cleaning toilets or jumping off cliffs are activities that come to mind, though I’m not sure anyone will pay them to do the latter.

Article here.

A couple of Peeping Thomasinas have taken to Twitter to complain bitterly that they failed to cop an eyeful after a recent NFL game. The two lascivious creatures tried getting into the men’s locker room, only to be stopped by some old fuddy duddy who was, apparently, under the impression that not all males like to have their members stared at by members of the Superior Sex.

One of the women, the bizarrely named Graham Watson, screeched hysterically…

“I have covered male sporting events all over the world and it took coming to Indianapolis to face my first gender discrimination.”

I wonder what she would call male reporters being asked to wait while an usher checked with a women’s team if they were allowed to come in? Common sense, that’s what she would call it. But her female privilege stops her seeing it that way when it’s men whose privacy is being respected.

In typical Amerikan fashion, the NFL teams involved completely failed to stand up for their sex by actually apologizing to the perverted women for not allowing them to get their jollies! Here’s an unlikely headline – “WNBA Apologizes For Not Letting Men See Players With Their Pussies Hanging Out!”

Ms Watson later tweeted…

“I do want to note that we were eventually allowed through, but by the time we got inside there wasn’t a naked cock to be seen. Very disappointing! Now, if you will excuse me, I have to go Google for “naked jocks with big cocks.”

Feminist indignation at its finest here.