Skip to content

Man Bites Bitch

Man Bites Bitch published on

In this interesting little video, a female bonobo goes ape and starts throwing her tiny little fists around. Despite being tiny, they are hard enough to bloody the nose of a man who was not being violent towards her. He seems to be trying to get her out of the house, she asks him, “What you gonna do, hit a girl,” then hits him in the face, figuring, no doubt, that like most Western males this guy is too much of a pussy to stand up for himself. But, perhaps fed up with taking shit from the rabid monkey that passes for Woman these days, the young dude slugs her one in the face and she goes down like a rock.

What follows is a truly astonishing display of how entitled women have become. The monkey starts jumping up and down and flinging feces around while screeching that the dude done hit her! Her male bitch seems to agree that niggers should never hit Whitey, even when Whitey has thrown the first punch. Even the dude’s friends seem rather freaked out by his retaliation. Because, you know, men are supposed to tolerate women’s violence like the second class citizens they have become. Luckily, there are cameras there to record the guy’s bloody nose. Were it not for that, he would probably be sitting in a jail cell for having the nerve to bite back.

And don’t you love that sound? “Thwack!” The sound of one woman’s female privilege running out.

No reason to be calling her a lesbo, though, it just makes the uploader look bad.

Is James Deen a Rapist?

Is James Deen a Rapist? published on

Not the movie star James Dean, mind you. He can’t rape anyone – his dick rotted off decades ago. No, this is a porn star and Zionist supremacist called James Deen who, according to another obscure porn star called Bolli, or Stoli, or is it Stoya? Pravda? Some such thing. Anyway, according to this girl, Deen raped her. And how do we know he raped her? Because she said so. Duh.

Now, while we have yet to hear from what appears to be the Jewish equivalent of Mel Gibson, there are several red flags on Stoya’s story.

First, as is so common nowadays, the so-called victim is so under-whelmed by her traumatic experience that, rather than go to the police, she instead takes to Twitter to make her accusations. I am no expert on rape victims, but I find it hard to believe that most of them wouldn’t want the bastard locked up, as opposed to just vilified by the hysterical harpies and hormonal teenagers that dominate social media.

The second red flag is that this woman is pretty obscure. I have only ever read her name once before, so it’s not like she’s the Marilyn Chambers or Jenna Jameson of her generation, is it? But now? Well, now we all know who she is, don’t we? And that probably means she’ll be getting paid a lot more moolah the next time she jumps on some gigantic dong in front of a camera.

The third flag is the accuser’s admission that she is a feminist. This is a lot like a white woman who has accused a black man of stomping on her roses admitting to being a member of the KKK! Surely, only the most naïve would fail to see a possible political motivation behind such an accusation!

Admittedly, these are only red flags and not proof positive that Deen went nowhere near the woman’s roses, but on the weight of the evidence it won’t surprise me if this turns out to be yet another unconfirmed attack on a well-known man’s character. Only time will tell for certain, but my view is that Little Ms. Cumstain is probably full of it, and by “it” I don’t mean that white, gooey stuff!

Story here. And don’t read the comments unless you want to go into a rage. One guy actually has the sense to say we should wait for evidence and is called “disgusting,” and the insult receives 223 likes. Makes me wish SJWs would all catch syphilis and die. Now that I think of it, given their inability to reason clearly, most of them probably already have syphilis! Now, if only they would hurry up and die!

Parisian Blood On Left Wing Hands

Parisian Blood On Left Wing Hands published on

Let me make this clear, I am no right winger. But neither am I some PC libtard. In fact, the left has become so contaminated by the PC brigade that I am seriously thinking of never calling myself a leftist ever again…

There is no denying, not to the honest mind, that the blood of 129 corpses and a couple of hundred survivors lies thickly coagulating on the hands of the Left Wing. It is the Left that continues to insist that the liberal west continue to take in barbarians from the Arab world. It is the Left that then actively encourages those people to keep their original culture rather than to assimilate into the new country. Asking those radically different to move into your house and to not adapt to your rules is a recipe for disaster, for mayhem, for mass murder and societal chaos. It is the Left that is responsible for the Parisian slaughter. It is the Left that is responsible for the mass rapes in Rotherham, England. It is the Left that is responsible for the ethnically motivated gang rapes of Anglo girls in Sydney. It is the Left that is responsible for the siege in Martin Place. It is the Left that is responsible for the anti-Jewish violence in Malmo, Sweden. It is the Left that is responsible for the London and Madrid bombings. Pretty much the only Muslim atrocity that can’t be laid at the feet of the Left is 9/11, given that those scumbags were all outsiders. But most of this evil is being perpetrated by a group of people welcomed into the henhouse by leftists and liberals with all the sense and reasoning ability of, well, the average chicken.

The roots of this invasion by stealth are, without a doubt, plutocratic ones. The plutocrats own the media and the politicians – they could put a stop to all this multi-cultural nonsense if they wanted to, but they like the idea of an illiberal future, not to mention the way Islam distracts us from their own evil. But the agents, the ground troops, of this plutocrat-led destruction of western liberalism are, without doubt, the leftists, the liberals, the progressives. Getting the Left to destroy the Left, it’s a masterstroke of strategy and one that is working brilliantly well. Mostly because only a few of us have the intellect and psychological independence to see what is being done, and even some of our select group are put off from speaking the truth by the inevitable cries of “Racist! Islamophobe! Werewolf! Vampire! Brony!” But not me. If I wanted to be popular I would have become a singer of sappy love songs or a comedian whose work targets teens and emotionally retarded adults, not a rabble-rouser. So let me say it again — the blood of the victims of Islam, their corpses, their amputated limbs, the shreds of their torn flesh, all these are on the politically correct Left’s hands.

Wank Toy Company In Trouble Over Manatee Intrusion

Wank Toy Company In Trouble Over Manatee Intrusion published on

grossly obese woman in fifi adSome company called Whizworx has found itself the target of social media outrage after a holidaying manatee found its way into its ad agency’s studios and into an advertising campaign. The manatee, who came ashore somewhere in Florida and wrecked the suspension of several vehicles getting to North Carolina, snuck into the studio and put on a 38 DD bikini, a pair of fishnet stockings once owned by J Edgar Hoover, and a black wig before proceeding to cavort in front of the camera in what one member of the crew called, “A surprisingly atrocious and depraved exhibition.”

Being high on coke, the photographer did not realize what had happened until the photo had hit the Instagram and caused a social media storm. With the insight so common amongst SJWs and feminists, the freak show called Twitter exploded into howls of outrage at what they saw as an attack on that most sacred of creatures, the morbidly obese Western woman. The company, being no doubt composed of typical, pussy-whipped western males, quickly pulled the ads and apologized for having offended manatees everywhere.

Since the social media storm, nothing has been heard of the manatee responsible for the outrage, but it is suspected that she is now back in the waters off Florida, where she and her friends are laughing it up at how insanely stupid those pink land creatures are.

Get your feminist freak out here.

A Word On The Religion Of Peace

A Word On The Religion Of Peace published on

There is no such thing. I don’t mean that there is no such thing as “a word,” but that there is no such thing as a “religion of peace,” certainly not amongst the Judeo Christian spectrum. Not Judaism, not Christianity, and certainly not Islam.

Everyone lies like dogs these days, with the right wing fabricating crap about Islam and the “left” making every excuse possible for the evils carried out in its name. The most common excuse put forward by the liberals and the left is that – somehow – you can’t blame the religion of Islam when a bunch of scum bags shoot dozens of French rock fans dead while screaming “Allahu Akbar!” Of course, if some radical Christians stormed a Mosque and slaughtered dozens while screaming “Jesus is Lord,” the leftist apologists would be singing a very different tune. So, given that neither side can be trusted, I decided after the recent slaughter of innocents in Paris to finally get myself a copy of the Quran and check out what the book itself says about killing the infidels. The version I went for is “The Noble Quran” by Hilali and Khan, the most commonly recommended English translation (recommended by the Muslims, not by right wing shock jocks ) and one sponsored by the Saudi government. And sure enough, once again the left has lied to me. The book does, indeed, contain several passages saying that non-believers should be killed. I suppose there are ways to interpret these passages as saying that the non-believers should not be killed, but to what passes for the left these days there are ways of interpreting Bruce Jenner’s bollocks as evidence that he is a woman! The two passages of the Quran that stand out as clearly as the aforementioned gonads are these…

“ They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliya ’ (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allah (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islam), take (hold of) them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliya (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.”

At best, this could be taken as an order to kill Muslims who bail out of the faith, but it can also be – and often is – taken as an order to kill those who reject Islam without having ever been part of it. Either way, it is a clear call to murder in a book that, my leftist friends would have you believe, contains no such thing. The other passage that is of great relevance to Islamic terrorism is this one…

“ Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward.”

In other words, if you fight for Allah, you will get to go to the Deluxe section of heaven, while the other Muslims go to the budget version. You get the Hilton, they get a sleazy motel with sticky carpets. What is most important here, though, is that this clearly does not refer to spiritual struggle as the injured, the blind, and the lame are exempt! Can these people not fight a spiritual fight? Of course they can, hence the only reason for the exemption is that the struggle referred to is a physical one. If the exemption was for the retarded and the insane, then it could be argued that the struggle is spiritual and that such mentally defective people are not fit for it. But no, there is no reason to excuse the non-participation of the physically handicapped unless the fight itself is a physical one.

There are other passages that seem to encourage the killing of non-believers, but they are somewhat more open to interpretation, especially in light of historical events taking place at the time these ideas were being formulated. But the two above? It is very hard to see how, put together, they don’t add up to “Kill the non-believers and you will go to an especially nice wing of heaven.” This then, is the smoking gun that so many leftists don’t want you to see, the irrefutable proof that the Quran does promote violence against non-believers. Other elements are involved in the sort of atrocity carried out by those Muslim savages over the weekend – Amerikan imperialism, European support for said evil, the slaughter of 100s of 1000s of Iraqis, and probably also Arab traditions separate from religious ones – but make no mistake, the book itself does encourage the slaughter of innocents, and that means that Islam itself, not just a few nutty outliers, is to blame. Can we blame all Muslims for the slaughter? No. Can we blame Islam itself? Yes, we can. Not only that, but we should blame Islam. Just as we blame “Man shall not lie with man as he lies with woman” for Christian homophobia. The book says it, and the gullible believe and act on it. Such it is with the Bible, such it is with the Quran.