Skip to content

Loony Feminist Germaine Greer Is Correct about Bruce Jenner

Loony Feminist Germaine Greer Is Correct about Bruce Jenner published on

It is one of the absurdities of the modern Left that they canā€™t tell shit from chocolate, freedom from oppression, or cocks from cunts.

In the wake of Orwellian calls for Germaine Greer to be denied a platform at Cardiff University because she occasionally takes her meds and ends up saying something sensible about eunuchs not being women, Greer has responded by re-iterating her one sensible stanceā€¦

ā€œJust because you lop off your dick and then wear a dress doesnā€™t make you a fucking woman. Iā€™ve asked my doctor to give me long ears and liver spots and Iā€™m going to wear a brown coat but that wonā€™t turn me into a fucking cocker spaniel.ā€

I didnā€™t know a doctor could give you liver spots. And even if they could, one would think that a bat as hoary as Greer would have more than enough of her own already. That temporary lapse into senility aside, Ms Greer is correct. A mutilated male is no more a female than a horse with some white stripes painted on its ass is a zebra. A cock turned inside out is not a vagina. If you think it is, try pumping some semen into it in the hopes of getting some kiddies to pop out. Wonā€™t happen, I tells ya. Why? Because real vaginas have a womb beyond them and, attached to that womb, ovaries that produce eggs to be fertilized by the aforementioned semen. These are very basic biological facts, and it is a testament to the idiocy of what passes for the modern Left that they need to be pointed out.

Greer continued her brief moment of lucidityā€¦

ā€œI do understand that some people are born intersex and they deserve support in coming to terms with their gender but itā€™s not the same thing. A man who gets his dick chopped off is actually inflicting an extraordinary act of violence on himself.ā€

Once again, the antediluvian, antipodean, hag gets it right. Thereā€™s a huge difference between someone born intersex and choosing to go this way or that and some idiotic freak who canā€™t tell the difference between a bratwurst and a clam. Itā€™s also refreshing to see a feminist, of all things, describing what these poor bastards do to themselves as an act of violence. ā€˜Tis a fine sign of how insane the world has become, that a noted man-hater is one of the few willing to say that a man who willingly has his cock and balls hacked off is doing something grotesquely violent to himself. That reality, of course, will be ignored by the other members of the sisterhood, as it not only denies their twisted concept of ā€œwhat is,ā€ but threatens to rob them of the covert thrill that so many of them get from knowing there are men out there castrating themselves.

But, perhaps showing her age, Greer also shows signs of pussying out…

ā€œIā€™m not saying that people should not be allowed to go through that procedure, what Iā€™m saying is it doesnā€™t make them a woman. It happens to be an opinion, itā€™s not a prohibition.ā€

No, grandma, the idea that undergoing the procedure does not make one a woman is not an opinion, it is a fact. Unless, of course, one defines woman primarily as a cultural construct, as gender as opposed to sex. In other words, if one thinks societyā€™s input into what makes a woman a woman is more important than natureā€™s. This is another aspect of the debate that the Left likes to ignore ā€“ the way men like Bruce Jenner are enforcing gender restrictions by saying, in effect, that to be feminine is to be female. But the two are not the same. Femaleness is in your DNA, in your body ā€“ femininity is in what your culture teaches you. That is why Boudica was both female and, by todayā€™s standards, unfeminine ā€“ because the latter is determined by the culture of the time, not by nature. The same, of course, holds for maleness and masculinity.

As a further sign that the old grey mare isnā€™t what she used to be, Greer also refers to Bruce Jenner as ā€œhe/she.ā€ Bruce Jenner is neither woman nor hermaphrodite, so it does look as if even Greer is partly giving in to the pressure to conform to Orwellian definitions of what is and what is not.

But perhaps the most worrying sign in all this is that the wimpy old hag has given her enemies what they want by canceling her appearance at the Uniā€¦

ā€œBugger it. Itā€™s not that interesting or rewarding.ā€

Way to go, you tough old bitch! Just shows that, if hit long enough and hard enough, even the anti-pc brigade can be pressured into going along with at least part of the anti-reason, anti-enlightenment claptrap put out there by these so-called Leftists. Still, at least she has put up some resistance, and for that alone I have to say it ā€“ Germaine Greer is still a piece of shit, but not quite as big a one as I thought.

As for the whole idea of men ā€œbecoming women,ā€ all that needs to be said is ā€“ No cunt? No ovaries? No womb? No woman!

Greer dishes out the basic biology right here.