Skip to content

Cuties Ain’t So Cute

Cuties Ain’t So Cute published on

Now that the Netflix atrocity ā€œCutiesā€ has splashed onto the internet like a turd hitting the toilet water, i feel like itā€™s my responsibility as a rational adult to say that this is wrong, wrong, wrong — so wrong itā€™s possibly the wrongest thing ever.

I wasnā€™t planning on writing about this, but i find myself surprisingly disturbed by it ā€“ and i watched the McNutt suicide video with all the emotion of a coroner carrying out an autopsy. But this, this is repulsive on a completely different level that i, frankly, canā€™t explain. Maybe itā€™s just some sort of innate revulsion at people too young to breed being portrayed as sex objects. Not many cats trying to hump kittens, you know. It just ainā€™t part of the natural order.

I havenā€™t seen the entire thing, nor do i plan to, but i did watch the clip in which the little girls do an erotic dance routine that is beyond the pale for a bunch of 11 and 12 year olds. Barely-there outfits, floor-humping, crotch shots, and for a few seconds we actually see the girls down on the floor pretending to get…er…bleeped from behind!

 

Hey, look, it’s a still from Roman Polanski’s favorite new movie!

Either that or humping the floor, but it looks more like the former to me. At least thatā€™s whatā€™s happening when i see women doing that in porn movies. Yesā€¦ i watch porn starring women instead of children, but i guess iā€™m just not as hip as the guys at Netflix. Let me be blunt — there is absolutely no reason to make this filthy movie other than to normalize the sexualization of children and therefore of pedophilia.

Excuses will be made about how the movie is actually against the very thing it is doing, but thatā€™s bullshit. Any points the movie does make against the sexualization of children could have been made, well, WITHOUT SEXUALIZING CHILDREN! Taking the scene mentioned above, the point could have been made just as well with some very mild twerking being shown on-screen, then reaction shots of the horrified on-screen audience as the girls move on to more provocative crap that is not shown to the OFF-screen audience. Itā€™s called a cutaway, and is common even in transgressive genres like horror. If i know that, so does the asshole who directed the thing.

And that leaves me with only one conclusion ā€“ the movieā€™s main purpose is to normalize the sexualization of children while pretending to condemn it. Itā€™s not an accident, itā€™s a deliberate tactic. This is part of a vile movement to make child molestation acceptable, like those turds trying to re-brand pedos as MAPS — minor-attracted persons — in order to make them seem harmless. The people behind this movie know that the sexualized depiction of children makes such a thing less shocking and, in time, less unacceptable. They know that this will lead to people thinking less unfavourably of pedophiles, and that will lead to less convictions, and shorter sentences and, in time, a full normalization of child sexual abuse. That is almost certainly the goal, of that i have no doubt. I don’t say it often, but this movie needs to be banned — or at the very least heavily censored.

On the positive side, the revulsion has been almost universal. The liberal elites are trying to portray it as some sort of conservative backlash, but thatā€™s just more pedos making excuses. Look at the ratio the trailer has on YouTube. There is NO WAY you get these kind of numbers without a huge number of ordinary liberals throwing upā€¦

BLM and ANTIFA ARE NOT REVOLUTIONARIES!

BLM and ANTIFA ARE NOT REVOLUTIONARIES! published on

This is going to be a bit of a wild rant, but i have to get it out or i will explode and then there will be bacon and pig gizzards all over the studio and nobody wants that.

BLM and ANTIFA are NOT fucking revolutionaries! Revolution is the weak attacking the strong, not the weak attacking each other. At no point did Karl Marx write, ā€œWorkers of the world, burn down your own neighborhoods.ā€ At no point did the angry Frogs decapitate one another while refusing to storm the palace at Versailles. At no point did the Bolsheviks burn down ordinary peopleā€™s hovels while leaving the aristocracy to sleep safely in their palaces. At no point did the American Revolutionaries shoot their own people while leaving Georgieā€™s boys to enjoy their tea and scones in peace.

When the lower classes attack other members of the lower classes, that is not called revolution — it is called thuggery. And if your thuggery gets you a bullet in the head, you have nobody to blame but yourself. If your revolution is the real deal, you burn down Wall Street, not Main St. You kill Jeff Bezos, not some poor schmuck minding his own business. You drop a firebomb on Beverly Hills, you donā€™t set fire to some homeless manā€™s mattress. Until BLM and Antifa start targeting the plutocrats rather than the peasants they are nothing but utter scum doing the devilā€™s work and whatever they get from pissed off, trigger-happy Right Wingers, they have coming. Well, the violent ones do. We must be careful to remember that even with BLM and Antifa, there are some ā€œvery fine peopleā€ in there. But the ones being violent towards their fellow peasants? Fuck ā€˜em.

And then thereā€™s the funding received by BLM. How the FUCK can anyone look at that and see revolution? Did the Czar hand the Bolsheviks hundreds of millions of dollars or whatever the fuck they had back then? Did King George finance the American Revolution? Did Marie Antoinette offer the peasants gold and diamonds instead of cake? No. You know why? BECAUSE THE PEOPLE BEING REBELLED AGAINST DONā€™T FINANCE THE PEOPLE TRYING TO OVERTHROW THEM! Yet this is what is happening with BLM. Corporations are not only publicly supporting it, but throwing money at BLM! Literally hundreds of millions of dollars from trash like the Ford Foundation! So no, neither of these groups are
revolutionaries. What they are is soldiers of the plutocracy stoking hatred and division amongst the lower classes in order to stop us from stocking up on guillotines. In order to make the poor blacks blame the poor whites and vice versa rather than getting together to put the plutocrats six feet under. In order to protect the corporations throwing millions of blood stained dollars at them. This is fact. This is truth. And until the woke mob truly wakes up, all things will do is get steadily worse.

Rant over.

Ryan Whitaker Was White, So No Protests For Him

Ryan Whitaker Was White, So No Protests For Him published on

Not much MSM coverage, either. And while George Floyd’s murder was clearly unjust, at least Whitaker wasn’t even resisting arrest. In fact, he was in the act of putting his gun down when one of the pigs shot him in the back, fatally wounding him. Then both pigs stood around doing nothing as he lay dying. And why did he have a gun with him? Because the pigs knocked on his door and then stood off to the side so that he didn’t know who was out there. And in today’s world, you never know, it could be a psycho. Or a cop. Not much difference these days. But you see, Ryan was just a white man so society isn’t going to care any more than they cared when Daniel Shaver was murdered. Strange, given that America is run by whites. It’s almost as if the rich whites are privileging black lives over white lives to get Whitey feeling resentful towards Blacky…

Ryan Whitaker: Arizona Man Shot & Killed By Police After Noise Complaint