Skip to content

Lucy van Pelt Named Ms Magazine’s Woman Of The Year.

Lucy van Pelt Named Ms Magazine’s Woman Of The Year. published on

Notorious fussbudget and pioneering feminist Lucy van Pelt was today named Ms Magazine’s woman of the year, an honor previously bestowed on such distinguished women as Aileen Wuornos , Lorena Bobbitt and Cyndi Lauper.

When presenting Ms van Pelt with the award,  Executive Editor Katherine Spillar said that “From the very beginning of the Peanuts phenomenon Lucy has shown us women how to rise up against oppression by the phallocentric American patriarchy.  By constantly pulling the patriarchal football out from under Charlie Brown’s foot, Lucy sent out a post-modernist clarion call that women would no longer be mere servants to male whims. That from now on, all men would have to make their own beds, cook their own dinners, and hold their own balls. Over the decades, as Lucy has grown into a mature and sophisticated woman,  she has continued to defy the patriarchy with everyday rebellions such as bad psychiatric advice and a steadfast refusal to stop her ongoing sexual harassment of classical pianist Schroeder, who was last month found hanging by one of his piano wires from the monkey bars in his local playground. Now in her 60s Lucy continues to wage the war against patriarchy by running a refuge for female hamsters who have been abused by their male partners.”

Accepting the award Ms van Pelt stated that she was pretty sure Peppermint Patty wasn’t gay as “I once tried to hit on the stupid bitch and she wasn’t having any of it, and if she doesn’t wanna do me she sure as hell isn’t doing that little dweeb Marcy.”

Ms van pelt also refused to deny or confirm rumors that she will be running for the U.S Senate, responding instead with “None of your business you insensitive male bastard!” before chasing our reporter out of the function rooms.

Man-Hating Bitch Crawls into Doghouse

Man-Hating Bitch Crawls into Doghouse published on 3 Comments on Man-Hating Bitch Crawls into Doghouse

Sharon Osbourne, whose recent glee at a Californian man’s castration gave us all the shits, is “taking a break” from hanging with the other man haters at The Talk.

This hiatus could be due to the recent protests at her disgusting behavior over the Catherine Kieu matter, or it could be because she is an unpleasant person who is hated by many she works with – and there have been reports of tensions with the other The Talk women in the past.

Osbourne claims she is taking a rest so she can spend more time with her likable but apparently brain-dead husband Ozzy, and that she will eventually return to The Talk. But that may be a face-saving way of admitting that once again she has been an asshole and more trouble than she’s worth, so nobody wants her around any more.

While I would like to think that someone at CBS has given her the heave-ho over her hate speech, I don’t think that’s likely. The men’s movement doesn’t have that kind of power yet, and hatred of males  is so entrenched in western society that I doubt any of the men in power cared enough to have her fired. More probable is that Osbourne is simply the kind of woman who sooner or later gets everyone’s back up simply by virtue of being her odious herself. Whatever the true motive one thing is certain – television is now just a little less evil than before.

More here.

A Closer Look at the Scuzz from “The Talk”

A Closer Look at the Scuzz from “The Talk” published on

When women laugh their heads off at some poor guy having his penis hacked off, one immediately thinks, “What kind of women are these, and do they have any sons?” So I took a look at that old Wiki there, and here are some raw stats on these man-hating GynoBeasts…

Sara Gilbert was the closest thing to a decent human being on that panel, so I’ll be leaving her alone. I will just mention that she is a lesbian with one adopted son, and she is the creator of the show so if anyone has the power to do something about this it’s Gilbert – though I won’t be holding my breath. Gilbert is also a vegan, which makes her a rarity amongst lesbians.

First and foremost amongst these dirtbags we have Sharon Osbourne, a creature who needs no introduction. Osbourne has two sons, one biological and one adopted. One might wonder how she would explain her hateful behavior to the boys, but being raised by such a woman they probably won’t even bother to ask why their sex is treated as a walking punchline. As for poor old Ozzy’s ball and chain, I can only hope that her cancer comes back and that this time the Devil doesn’t do her any favors…

Leah Marie Remini has no sons, just a male dog that she married back in ’03. She is a scientologist though, so whenever she does something reprehensible she can always plead some sort of mental impairment.

Holly Robinson Peete has three sons. That’s three dicks just waiting to be hacked off by some psycho woman, at which point mommy can call her mates over and they can all have a good laugh at the bleeding stump.

And last but not least we have Julie Chen. Chen’s ass won’t be hit by the door anytime soon as she is married to Les Moonves, the big cheese at CBS. Since marrying Les, Chen has been stepmother to two boys and last year gave birth to her own baby boy, for whom she apparently cares little otherwise she would not be such a misandrist cow. Now here is the killing joke – Chen stole her husband from his previous wife, so I must ask her if stealing another woman’s husband means Chen “deserves” to have her cunt hacked out? If the answer is yes, just give me a call Julie – I’ll be round with a chainsaw quicker than you can say “man-hating, home-wrecking scumbag.”

Catherine Kieu Becker is a Castrating Scumbag

Catherine Kieu Becker is a Castrating Scumbag published on

Not happy with cutting off her husband’s penis Catherine Kieu Becker then threw it in the garbage disposal, presumably so it couldn’t be reattached.

The little turd then told the authorities that he “deserved it,” perhaps because he was divorcing her,  though once she lawyers up we can no doubt expect a laundry list of imaginary offenses with which to vilify the victim and minimize the crime.

If American men had any self respect left they would lynch the cow, but as we all know by now most of them probably agree that he “deserved it,” and will be having a good laugh instead. And that brings me to the question of what should be the penalty for cutting off a man’s penis.

Perhaps the penalty for such a crime should be death, at least in the US where the idea of the death penalty for rape has at times been proposed. After all, you can get over a rape, but you can’t get over having your penis cut off and minced. We must also consider the hate crime aspect of this particular type of offense. What Becker did was not merely an attack on her husband but also on you, on me, your sons, your brothers. It was in short a collective “fuck you” to the male sex, just as some racists dragging a black man behind a truck till his head tears off is a collective “fuck you” to all black people.

No doubt there are those who will argue that there must be some psychiatric or psychological explanation for this GynoBeast’s actions, that something is wrong with the poor dear. And of course they are right, there is something wrong with her – she’s a scumbag.

More here

No kidding please, we’re Australian…

No kidding please, we’re Australian… published on

Oh dear, the Land of Oz is turning into Old Blighty. As many already know, the UK has some ridiculously strict defamation laws, and if this recent case is anything to go by Australia is going down the same slippery slope.

A couple of years ago a well known comedian called Mick Molloy made a joke about some thin-skinned woman cheating on her husband. That’s all it was, a joke put out there by a man who nobody in their right mind takes seriously. Yet the woman,  failed Labor politician Nicole Cornes, has just won an $85,000 lawsuit against Molloy and the TV station that broadcast the alleged defamation.

What this means is that in Australia, unless you have a corporation backing you, you had better not say anything negative about anyone who can afford a good lawyer, no matter how obvious it would be to a reasonable person that you weren’t being serious. This seems to me bad news for Australian political bloggers as well as for the independent press, who would easily be ruined by such a settlement. It’s also bad news for the lower strata of society, since as we have seen time and again, the mainstream media cares little for anyone other than the rich, the powerful, and a few fashionable causes amongst which neither the poor nor homeless are to be found.

A caveat to American bloggers – an Australian called Joe Gutnick once successfully sued an American publication for defaming him, but he did so under the stricter Australian laws. You heard me. Gutnick sued a bunch of  Americans not under their country’s law, but under ours. Why did he succeed? Because the allegations may have been made by Americans writing in America, but they did so on a website, which means he was being defamed in Australia whenever someone viewed the offending site. At least that was the excuse. And Gutnick’s target  wasn’t some small fish either, it was Dow Jones, so keep in mind that you are less liable to our fascist laws, but by no means immune.

Article here.

Primary Sidebar

Secondary Sidebar