The bastards at the United Nations World Food Programme are  openly acknowledging that  in the devastated Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince,  their relief workers are  handing out food to women, and only women !

These champions of the needy are seeing to it that only members of the Sacred Sex  are being given the coupons that allow them to collect a 55 pound (25 kilogram) bag of rice, the implied excuse being, as it often is with anti-male initiatives, that it’s all about the kiddies!

UN Muppet Markus Prior  told CNN that…

“Our long experience in food distribution tells us that by delivering food into the hands of women, it is more likely to be redistributed equitably among the household — including the men,”

So supposedly, giving women the rice will see to it that everyone in the family gets a fair share, because as we all know women are pure and loving creatures who are incapable of things like selfishness or greed! This excuse is not only immoral in that it ignores many of the needy, but is also logically untenable  – if concern for the families was the true motive, the United Nations World Food Programme would put the word out that, man or woman, if you bring some kiddies with you and they aren’t looking up at you as if they’re thinking “Who the hell is this fucker?” then we give you the bag of rice!  In truth,  even that would be grossly callous, after all there are plenty of single people in Haiti, not to mention parents who have lost all their children, but at least it would be a gender-neutral callousness, which probably explains why it isn’t happening.

Unless these UN clowns are as stupid as they are corrupt, I can only assume that this is yet another excuse for the UN to help only the Important Sex, after all these are the misandrist bastards who set up UNIFEM but no male equivalent, and who have feminist nutters like Nicole Kidman telling  Republican baby-kissers that Hollywood encourages violence against women, so what else can we expect?

More on this U.N sanctioned act of hatred here.

The guy in the photo is Rico Dibrivell, who was pulled out of the rubble 14 days after the earthquake – now all he has to do is not starve to death.

SAMHSA, which is an agency of the U.S Department of Health and Human Services, has come up with a report that confirms what many in the MRM have long been arguing – the little girlies are  becoming increasingly violent.

According to the National Survey on Drug Use & Health…

Almost 19% of adolescent females got into a serious fight in the year previous to taking part on the research…

About 14 percent of girls took part in acts of group-against-group violence (that one surprised even me)…

Almost 6% of girls attacked someone with “the intent to seriously hurt them”…

and almost 27% of the girlies have committed at least one of these offences in the 12 months leading up to the survey.

Those figures are in themselves rather damming, but even more telling is that even though the figures for violence amongst boys are worse, they are so only by a relatively small margin…

Rounding the figures up or down to the nearest whole number, they boil down to this …

Serious fights, 19 % of girls, 25% of boys.

Group violence, 14 % of girls, 17 % of boys

Intent to cause serious harm, 6% of girls, 9% of boys

Engaging in at least one of these, 27% of girls, 34 % of boys.

The most significant difference here is in the intent to cause damage, with twice as many boys as girls. But hey, boys don’t get twice as many encouragements to be violent as girls do, they get a dozen times more; the girls get Buffy and Xena, the boys get everything else, not to mention that the boys get more opposite sex approval for being violent than the girls do.

Even though the report doesn’t mention figures from that long ago, these numbers are a very significant increase on what we saw in the eighties amongst girls, and the only thing I can think of that has changed since then is the portrayal of female violence as being cool – very few parents are telling their kids, regardless of sex, to be violent, and female DNA hasn’t changed in just one generation!

The media has a huge impact on people, especially the young and stupid, and here in Aus we have an example of this  that you guys in America don’t – we have wiggers without having the n***ers! I kid you not, there are thousands of kids in western Sydney dressing and talking like black Americans, without having ever lived amongst them! In the US this phenomenon is often speciously explained as the result of everyday contact with black people, but over here it’s all the media baby, no two ways about it – ain’t none of these kids spent a few weeks living in South Central!

Report here

We now present the first of what i hope will be many Guest Posts by Daisy Duchess, President of The National Organization of Feminist Weasels.

Daisy graduated from Wellesley in 1998 with a double major in Women’s Studies and Law. She spent seven years working as a prosecutor for the New Orleans D.A, a position which saw her jail thousands of homeless men for littering the streets with their presence.

Misogyny In Letters

By Daisy Duchess, President of The National Organization of Feminist Weasels

I would like to begin by thanking the pig for this opportunity, and by asking him if he’s stopped beating his wife and children yet. No, I don’t expect piggy to give me an answer to that, indeed I would expect him to take the Fifth! But that’s pigs for you, just so un-communicative!

Today I will present one of the many subtle yet pervasive acts of misogyny that occur in our society with frightening regularity – about every six minutes i believe.

Recently I visited a site by the name of Project Syndicate to check out Naomi Wolf’s latest writings, and as usual she was  a bit too centerish for my tastes, but the subject of this post is not Ms Wolf’s wimpiness, but rather the left sidebar which lists the site’s contributors under the heading “Thought Leaders.”

Looking at this sidebar you will notice, apart from its obvious phallic connotations (and don’t think I don’t know what that’s supposed to imply) that Ms Wolf’s name is at the very bottom of the list of contributors! Now, the patriarchally inclined would say “Well, Daisy that’s because the list is alphabetically arranged and Wolf begins with a W, and no other contributors have names beginning with X, Y or Z!”

Bah! To that  I say “Rubbish!” The fact is that ever since the prehistoric matriarchies were overthrown by the savage hordes of maleness, the patriarchy has arranged the order of letters in the alphabet to be prejudiced against women. As everyone knows, women have a natural tendency towards having surnames that begin with the latter letters of the alphabet (Wolf, Steinem, Xylophone and Zoology) whereas men are more likely to have surnames that start with the earlier letters (Bush, Cheney, Beck and my local grocer Billy Aardvark).

This, and only this, is the reason why names are arranged “alphabetically” in the modern patriarchies – the oppression and relegation of women to the bottom of website sidebars! After all, if this isn’t the purpose of this particular type of tyranny, why not just place names haphazardly? It would play havoc with library catalogs you say? Bah, don’t be so naïve!

This patriarchal colonization of the means of communication, the locus of intellectual self-expression, is the kind of small, everyday attack on women that society tends to largely ignore, the kind of attack that makes women feel diminished every time they open a book or write a letter, the kind of attack that must end, especially now that we have a feminist in the White House.