Skip to content

Female Teachers Giving Boys Lower Marks

Female Teachers Giving Boys Lower Marks published on

We have all wondered why boys seem to be at least as smart as girls in real life, yet do so badly in school. The usual explanations range from the merely condescending (“The boyz is lazy” ) to the downright hateful( “The boyz is just stoopid, so let them rot,”) but those of us who don’t buy all the female supremacist hogwash have always suspected there may be an anti-boy bias in the marking.

Well, now we can stop conjecturing — a study by the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics has just shown that female teachers are giving boys lower marks than they deserve. The study itself was about student perceptions of discrimination, and it found that boys perceived female teachers as giving them lesser marks than merited. This could be put down to paranoia, except that the research backs the boys’ perceptions. Half the classes involved had their paper marked by in-house teachers whoknew who they were dealing with, and the other half  by external examiners who had no idea whose work they were assessing. And wouldn’t you know it, the external examiners gave the boys higher marks than the in-house teachers. I’m sorry to say that the reverse is also true, that male teachers tend to be kinder when marking boys than when marking girls and that obviously isn’t cool, but for every male teacher giving the boys more than they deserve there are three or four female teachers giving the girls more than is their due, and you don’t need to be a mathematics genius to figure out which sex is going to suffer more.

There are other factors of course — a culture that tells boys they are morons can’t be helping any, neither can the lack of male role models in front of those blackboards — but this is one factor which is measurable, and in that sense this bad news is also good news – let’s just hope it doesn’t get buried by the  feminists and their mates in the mainstream media.

 

Article in the left-leaning The Independent, which is a nice surprise.

Abstract here

The paper itself

 

 

 

California to Set Free Shitload of Female Prisoners

California to Set Free Shitload of Female Prisoners published on

California is about to relieve its overcrowded prison system by letting out some of their female inmates, namely those that have committed crimes that were “nonviolent, nonserious and not sexual” and who have children to look after.

Since minor, non-violent crims shouldn’t be in jail to begin with, and are thrown in with the scum only to fatten corporate wallets, this is good news. But what about the fathers and the childless folks who have committed such minor offenses? Why are only the women with children being given this break? The attached article claims that similar may be done for male inmates in the future, but in my view that “may” is worth about as much as a badly bent 75 cent coin. While hoping that this is the beginning of an initiative that will see large numbers of harmless fools let  back out into the sunlight, I am inclined to think that this will all fade away once the federal government stops hassling California about its overstuffed chicken pens and goes on to matters more important than freeing men who shouldn’t be in jail.

As for the equally clear discrimination against the childless, I will put that down to two factors. By letting parents out, they not only save money at the jail end of things, but also on welfare aid to whoever is looking after the children now, a secondary gain which obviously will not come about when  releasing the childless. The other thing that comes to mind is that this is yet another way to pressure people into having kids to feed to the machine. Plan to smoke pot or shoplift a pack of munchies? Why, just turn out a few puppies first and you’ll never go to jail again! Congratulations, you’ve just given birth to a nine pound “Get Out of Jail Free” card!

More here