Skip to content

Cheeto Man Vs Psycho Granny – Who Will Win?

Cheeto Man Vs Psycho Granny – Who Will Win? published on

Hell, i don’t know! What am i, psychic?!?!?! From what i have seen of the polls it looks like Clinton is a bit ahead, though i suspect the polls are hiding a lot of Trump supporters so it could very well be Trump who wins and by quite a margin. You see, not only is there the possibility that the polls – which are part of the establishment that Trump is threatening to shit on – are downplaying Trump’s lead in an attempt to not make Demoncrats think that it’s all over and that they shouldn’t even bother to vote, but it is entirely possible that many Trump voters are telling pollsters that they are planning to vote for Clinton! Why would anyone do such a bizarre thing, you ask? What a deplorable question that is! That’s right – unlike most election cycles, it is not only the candidate that is being vilified but also his deplorable and irredeemable supporters! Under such circumstances, there is bound to be some dissembling amongst the vilified, partly for purely psychological reasons but also for more practical reasons such as being afraid the pollster will tell your blue-tinted neighbors that you are a Nazi and that you will end up at the wrong end of a baseball bat! Based on all this, i hope it will be Trump who gets in, if only by a narrow margin. That’s barring the kind of fraud that the so-called left takes seriously when they are the ones making the claim, but which they dismiss as mere conspiracy theory when it’s the other guy that’s worried his vote may end up in a digital landfill somewhere.

So, what will happen if one or the other wins?

First, let me wipe my ass by getting Hillary Clinton out of the way. If Clinton wins, we are almost certainly in for a couple more endless (and endlessly profitable) wars in those countries that practice the so-called religion of peace. Now, i don’t want the West flooded with Muslim savages, but neither do i want psychopathic neo-cons going around blowing said savages and their kiddies to Kingdom Come. This is something that many “leftists” fail to grasp – just because you don’t want the smelly, crazy, homeless man down the street sleeping on your couch does not mean that you want him dead!

A Clinton presidency will also mean the continuation of the twin evils of neo-liberalism and globalization. As she told some of the puppet masters, a huge market with open borders is the kind of thing that gets her otherwise dried up blood really flowing. Count on the TPP being passed, count on millions of illegal immigrants willing to work for peanuts being given amnesty, count on more poverty, count on more unemployment, and count on more misery.

But the worst thing about Clinton is the possibility that she will start a direct or indirect war with The Big Angry Bear What Has Nukes! Wouldn’t that be wonderful, boys and girls? A full-on war between the world’s two great nuclear powers! The Amerikans and the Russians get vaporized, and the rest of the world gets to die slowly from radiation poisoning – how’s that for making your mark on history, Granny? But that, i hope, is the worst case scenario and only an outside possibility…

From a men’s rights perspective, a Clinton presidency won’t mean quite the
holocaust so many MRAs seem to fear. While Clinton getting into the WH will embolden a lot of feminists, there won’t be that much practical change. There can’t be, as Clinton herself has made it clear that she is talking shit whenever she addresses the feminist part of her constituency. If you don’t believe me, check out the Wikileaks bit where she tells the puppet masters that the US does not need any new laws to give women “equal pay,” as they already have such laws! She might make the penal system even easier on women, but even that seems unlikely – the corporate sector makes too much money out of their convict slaves. She could, of course, just replace those female cons by locking up more males, which would be in keeping with her style. But other than that i can’t see much happening. Probably the biggest effect will be a psychological one – more female sexism, more girl power crap, more articles and books about how wonderful women are and so on. But much of this will be countered by the fact that Trump getting the nomination and almost winning the WH will embolden a lot of us “deplorables.” Contrary to the pseudo-left’s wishes, the anti-PC, anti-plutocratic crusade begun by Cheeto Man is not about to go away any time soon. Most of us irredeemable types will feel down for a couple of days, drown our sorrows in beer and video games, and then set about trying to finish the revolution Trump has started knowing that this time we almost did it — next time, the establishment may not be so lucky. Next time, just enough people may ignore the one-sided MSM to get us the “deplorable” president the world deserves. On the other hand, if the fall of trump is allowed to happen, any other outsider – left, right or both – might never stand a chance. The all-out assault by all elements of the establishment on someone who poses an actual threat to the dominant order, if allowed to succeed, will set a precedent that will haunt Amerika for decades to come. Sure, they probably won’t be as vicious as they have been with the obnoxious Trump, but they will be just as dishonest and just as biased. When a nice, civil outsider comes along, you can guarantee that they will be portrayed as soft-spoken yet dangerous lunatics ( the establishment came pretty close to doing this with Bernie Sanders ) and that such attacks will be more numerous unless said outsider, like Trump, has a shit-load of well paid lawyers just dying to sue. I say this with no hyperbole — the fall of Trump may very well be the fall of all hope for meaningful reform in the United States Of Wall Street.

As for me personally, a Clinton victory will mean i get to spend the next four to eight years attacking all those dirtbag celebs and moronic liberals who voted for the TPP and the endless wars. Hey, it’s not much, but in a world this corrupt and insane, it’s all that we, the sane minority, have left! If nothing else, a Clinton presidency will be great for those of us who love a good internet fight. Unless Hillary Clinton starts a war with Russia, in which case we may all be vaporized before we can even get to our keyboards…

And what happens if Trump wins? Well, unless Trump is an even more egregious liar than his opponent – chances are that he isn’t, since, given how much the elites hate him, he probably isn’t going around telling the folks one thing in public then telling Wall St another in private – both neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism will take a well-deserved kick to the teeth. Hopefully the TPP will be pelted with Molotov cocktails and go down in flames, the neo-conservatives will be handed over to ISIS, and the US will go back to trying to take over the world the old fashioned way – by using McDonald’s and Hollywood rather than the Marines and Lockheed Martin. That alone would be a great improvement on the last fifteen years, especially for those who prefer their sand yellow, not red.

And will Trump build the much-vaunted Wall? Frankly, i doubt it. I expect him to crack down on migration – he pretty much has to unless he wants to be one of those one-term losers – but i suspect his wall will be a figurative one. Beyond that, who the hell can say what he’s going to do? Trump is certainly not going to make America great again, at least not from the working class perspective, as those days depended on lots of jobs – jobs that are being taken not only by illegals but also by machines that can’t be sent back over the border. But he probably won’t make it any worse than it is, which is what Clinton is certain to do with the TPP and whatever other hideous rabbit she is planning on pulling out of her hat. And could Trump be some sort of secret leftist? Could he be, as some conservatives have said all along, a RINO? Could he even be the re-incarnation of Uncle Karl? I doubt it. Leftist plutocrats are few and far between. A less evil plutocrat, that’s one thing – an angelic plutocrat is quite another. He’s probably more liberal than most people realize, and certainly less right wing than Clinton – though obviously also far less politically correct – but a full-on leftist i don’t expect him to be. Maybe some sort of third way guy that throws strict ideology out the window and combines what is good about the old-time left and what little is good about the right. And if Trump does establish this third way and it actually makes people’s lives better, maybe it will spread to the rest of the world and deal the neo-liberals an even greater blow. We can only hope.

A less tangible effect of a Trump win will be a huge surge in “deplorable” attitudes. Like it or not, in a weird, psycho-social sort of way, many people will feel that if the president says it’s cool, then it must be cool. This will hopefully lead to a wave of anti-PC attitudes which, hopefully, will finally destroy this great evil. Make no mistake, PC has little to do with helping the oppressed and everything to do with causing division amongst the lower classes through unjustified accusations of sexism, racism etc. Hell, just the other day some PC twit on Reddit accused me of being racist for shortening Pakistanis to Pakis! And this was in regard to a post in which i attacked Clinton for using drones to blow up – you guessed it – Pakistanis! Racism? If it is, i ain’t doin’ it right! The other use for PC is to hide the neo-liberal, neo-conservative nature of the Demoncrats and their elite supporters. They must be cool, right? Because, even though they want to send jobs overseas and blow up as many foreign Muslims as they can find, at least they aren’t calling Caitlyn Jenner any nasty names!

Also on the less tangible side of things, a Trump victory would be a huge psychological victory for the lower classes – Trump may be rich, but he’s still, somehow, perceived as lower-class. It’s weird as hell, but this billionaire is seen as less upper-class than his multi-millionaire foe! That’s because, as Old Money will tell you, there’s more to being upper-class than having a lot of shekels. For all his wealth, Trump is too tasteless, too tacky, too crass, to be truly one of the aristocracy. He is, in essence, LBJ with a fuck-load of money pouring out of his bunghole! And just like LBJ, he probably has more than one velvet painting of Elvis in his bathroom and everyone knows it! So, ironically, this filthy rich version of Trailer Park Bubba getting into the white house would make a lot of ordinary folks feel that they too may some day end up in a position of power. And as long as the Bubbas in question aren’t psychos like Clinton’s Bubba or retards like George W, that’s fine by me.

But what if all the doomsayers are correct? What if the old guy really is batshit crazy and decides to nuke Mexico because there were bugs in his burrito? What if he is actually the King Of The Lizard People? What if he is literally Hitler? What if, as one Christian Never-Trumper once told me, he is literally the Antichrist? What if underneath all that orange-hued, inarticulate goofiness lies not a mere doofus but someone who will bring all of existence to a screaming, blood-drenched end? Obviously, to anyone except the kind of retard who dominates the pseudo-left, all this is pretty far fetched. I guess it’s not totally impossible that he’s literally nuts, but there is no actual evidence that he is going to be anything as nightmarish as his haters would like him to be. And see, that’s the thing – Trump may turn out to be evil, but Clinton is certain to be evil because that’s what her record shows her to be! This is a woman who votes for unjustified wars, helps to blow up Paki children with Obama’s drones, laughs maniacally at the (admittedly well-deserved ) death of that Lybian dirtbag, and admits to her plutocratic masters that her private views are different to her public ones! The choice is stark, but obvious – who do you want babysitting your kids? The confirmed serial killer, or someone who may or may not be a serial killer? It’s not a pretty choice, but neither is it a very hard one to make.

Hillary Clinton To Name Bill Clinton As Rapist In Chief

Hillary Clinton To Name Bill Clinton As Rapist In Chief published on

 

The presidential hopeful today announced that, if she wins the presidency, her husband will be given the post of Rapist In Chief as well as several thousand bottles of Viagra.

The surprise announcement comes in the wake of revelations by various anti-feminist groups that the much cited figure that one in three college women are raped is fictional, and that the real figure is closer to one in fifty. Said the former Secretary of State…

“As a woman, it concerns me that so few young women are being raped in our colleges. It is a woman’s God given right to be raped, and if today’s young men are not up to the job, my husband is just the guy to step into the breach. So to speak. As the whole world knows, Bill is quite the expert when it comes to rape and sexual assault – just ask Juanita Broaddrick. Or Obama’s pet dog, for that matter!”

When asked how he felt about the promised appointment, President Clinton, whose right hand seemed to be doing the Lambada in his pocket, spat out some tobacco juice and yelled lustily…

“Yeehar, ahm gonna grab me some pussy!”

Words That Girlz Think Are, Like, Gross And Yucky And Stuff

Words That Girlz Think Are, Like, Gross And Yucky And Stuff published on

 

In another fine example of the unholy union between feminism and the plutocracy, some bossy, bitchy drama queens at Kellog’s have gone out of their way to ask British girls aged 16 to 24 which words they feel undermine their “strength as a female” and which they would like to actually ban from the English language! Yes, because what the world really needs is kids with little to no knowledge of the world telling the adults what words they should and should not be able to use.

According to the survey, which is part of a Special K advertising effort, young girls these days become hysterical and hormonal whenever someone uses words like “bossy” in their sacred presence. Said one precious young flower…

“Every time people call me a ball-breaker i feel really bad about myself because it suggests that breaking men’s balls is somehow a bad thing and it, like, you know, makes me feel guilty about breaking so many balls.”

According to some highly strung, over the hill haddock called Nicola Roberts…

“It is a strange thing that in a modern society we still have room for language that holds strong women back,”

…she said while weeping into her cheesecake. And it is indeed strange – strange that strong women would be held back by mere language. But then, i suspect that in typical feminist fashion our stale chicky-babe has a definition of strength that includes being a weak-minded pussy who can’t tolerate any degree of resistance and who hides under the table every time there is a thunder storm.

The survey also revealed that today’s high maintenance princesses would like instead to be described with bright, shiny adjectives such as “confident” and “courageous.” You will notice that the feisty young things do not state that they would like to be confident and courageous, only that they would like to be described that way. The former, you see, would entail the kind of hard work that today’s girls feel is beneath them — what they want is to be labeled Wonder Woman while acting more like Scooby Doo! Yes, i just compared today’s girls to a cowardly, cartoon dog. But that’s cool, because today’s manipulative young bitches don’t include “dog” or “bitch” on their list of words that should be banned by Big Sister. I also noticed that, funnily enough, these kiddies don’t seem to object to words like “cunt,” hence it must be okay to call the UK’s women “cunts.” Fancy that, when i finally get my OBE i can say to the Queen, “Thanks very much, your cunty majesty!”

More hormonal hysteria here.

Emma Watson Launches Initiative To Get Emma Watson Some Attention

Emma Watson Launches Initiative To Get Emma Watson Some Attention published on

She’s done this before, of course, with that misbegotten It’sAllAboutWomen thing. You remember that one — the one with the speech in which Watson, despite years as something akin to an actress, shook and stammered so much that we thought she would fall off the podium.

Well, this head on a stick apparently feels she’s been out of the headlines for too long, so she’s back with more feminist cowpats to fling at the few people who still care what this young has-been has to say.

This time, the attention-getting device is that feminist favorite — sexual assault in Universities. Really, feminists are so obsessed with sexual violence that i sometimes think that at least half of them must have subscriptions to the kind of adult website they like to complain about…

Anyway, at the 71st United Nations General Assembly in New York City, the once-famous midget and Ill Will Ambassador whined that not enough rapes are happening in her neck of the woods, and that this is leading her to spend too much money on you-know-what. “Why couldn’t the rape figures have been that wonderfully high when i was still in university?!?!?” she complained bitterly.

She also added that “The safety of women… is a right and not a privilege. As opposed to the safety of men and boys, which is all just a big joke. ”

More worrying is that 10 universities around the world, including the once-respectable University of Oxford, have promised to go full-retard SJW and start doing everything possible to lock up as many young men as possible. Cambridge, for example, is considering making the uttering of the word “fish” a sexual offense punishable by 6 months in the stocks or five minutes in a gender studies class, depending on how bad a mood the administration is in that day.

Feminist blitherings here

Is Souad Faress A False Rape Accuser?

Is Souad Faress A False Rape Accuser? published on

Back in December of 2014, Mark Pearson was walking through Waterloo Station when he passed the profoundly unattractive sixty-something Souad Faress, who was on her way to a rehearsal after having taken a class on how to lie about being raped. According to Faress, Pearson, ignoring all the hot young crumpet on offer, shoved three fingers up her vagina and kept them there for 2-3 seconds. Weird thing to do, and not only criminal but also in very bad taste. The problem is, there were no witnesses, no forensic evidence, and the security cameras showed there was absolutely no way he could have done what she says he done!

The cameras take a photo every second, and show that the guy spent less than one second near her! Not only that, but he appears to be holding a newspaper in one hand and has the other hand on the strap of his bag! So, to have committed the crime, he would have had to put away the paper, gotten past the rancid old ferret’s pants, kept his fingers inside her vagina for 2-3 seconds, then grabbed the newspaper and run off – all in less than one second! Unless this guy is The Flash, there’s no way that happened.

But wait, it’s possible that some other dude assaulted Faress because, as we all know, women never lie about this kind of thing. Problem is, there’s no mention of any camera footage showing that being done by anyone else, either! On top of that, Faress claims she yelled when the attack happened and that people all around her froze to see what was going on. But again, those pesky cameras show no such thing happening, they just show her looking back at the guy. And why was she looking back? Because, according to her, he had not only sexually assaulted her but also bumped her shoulder! Could this be what it all comes down to? Is Souad Faress such an evil woman that she decided to frame the guy for rape for the unforgivable crime of having bumped into her sacred female person? It wouldn’t surprise me, especially given that during the police interview she seemed more concerned with the shoulder incident than the so-called rape…

As is usually the case with such dirtbags, Souad Faress’s name has been kept out of the newspapers in order to encourage other women to make false allegations against innocent men. This is why there is a question mark after the title of this post – said mark does not refer to the supposed assault, which is clearly bullshit, but to the identity of the perpetrator of the false accusation. The one source naming Faress is an anonymous web post cited by Paul Elam in one of his videos. I’m sure it wouldn’t be the first time someone got things wrong while doxxing a dirtbag, but Faress does fit the description of the perpetrator of this crime and she hasn’t issued a denial. So, far as this little piggy is concerned, it looks as if Souad Faress is – probably – a lying piece of scum and should be locked up for her crime. That is highly unlikely to happen, given that Faress is not only a woman but also a minor celebrity in the UK. She has, apparently, been doing some long running radio show called The Archers, has appeared in one-off roles in many TV shows, and has a small role in the upcoming season of Game of Thrones. Put femaleness and celebrity together, and a person can get away with just about anything – just ask confessed child molester Lena Dunham, or confessed man-rapist Amy Schumer, or confessed man-basher Rhonda Rousey…

Article on the matter

Elam’s video

Anonymous post revealing name