Skip to content

Posts authored by The Pigman

Latest Patriarchal Tool of Oppression – Toon Characters’ Wrist Sizes

Latest Patriarchal Tool of Oppression – Toon Characters’ Wrist Sizes published on

Amanda Marcotte, a half-witted feminist mouthpiece best known for continuing to refer to the boys falsely accused at Duke University as rapists even after the semen in the victim was found to belong to someone else (that’s right, folks, Amanda’s deep knowledge of human biology tells her that it is possible for one man to ejaculate another man’s semen!) is now claiming that Disney is conspiring to oppress women through the way it depicts wrist size! The prime example she gives is that of Anna, the heroine of the recent Disney movie Frozen. Here is a still of Anna and a male oppressor. From the look of shame on the poor girl’s face, the male bastard has just pointed out how tiny her wrists are, and how this makes her an inferior form of life…

Echoing another loon called Phillip Cohen, Marcotte whines that in Disney movies in general, the difference between male and female wrist sizes is exaggerated in order to make men look sturdy and strong and women weak and pathetic, as well as to emphasize the idea that men and women are “opposite” and that girls suck at math and can’t drive!  Here’s a clue, you tiny-brained wonder – it’s a fucking cartoon! Exaggeration – including of differences –  is the norm in the genre! Does this sawdust-brained twat  think that this is what the average duck looks like…

You know, she probably does! Not only that, she probably thinks that’s what the average sailor looks like! The fact is that both Donald and the characters in Frozen are cartoons, they are not a depiction of reality, and whereas I can see the problem in the portrayal of women as wimpy and men as stupid, I sure as hell can’t see any woman with a brain bigger than a walnut walking around feeling bad about her wrists! As for the claim that Disney is doing this to emphasize that men and women are opposite, this is rubbish. What they are obviously emphasizing is that men and women are different, and that isn’t a narrative, it is an obvious truth. Marcotte then points out that in real life the difference is not as great, assuming that, like her, we need to have reality explained to us, and uses a study of soldiers as an example. Funny, she whines that Disney is misrepresenting the difference in wrist size, then she does something similar by underplaying the difference by using stats gathered from a population which is, in all likelihood, not representative. What, no stats on wrist size outside of the army?

Just think, all MRAs have to worry about are trivialities like the life expectancy gap, the education gap, the incarceration gap, the homelessness gap, etc… But hey, what the fuck are we whining about – at least we aren’t being portrayed in cartoons as having tiny wrists! The other thing Mad Mandy whines about is that the heroine of Frozen has eyes that are bigger than said wrists! You know what the character’s eyes are also bigger than, Amanda? That shriveled up prune you call a brain, that’s what.

 

Get your proof of feminist idiocy right here.

 

Cosmo Chick Gets Stupid

Cosmo Chick Gets Stupid published on

Assuming she hasn’t always been that way, of course. Not surprisingly, I don’t read Cosmo, partly because I am not a woman and therefore am not obsessed with sex, and partly because I already have enough shoes (that’s right, two whole pairs.) As it turns out, it looks as if Cosmo has a tendency to do what every other MSM outlet does, which is to parrot feminist nonsense.

Some plain little thing by the name of Anna Breslaw has decided to compile a list of ways that men insult women when they don’t intend to. This, of course, is a sin I have never been guilty of – when I insult women it is fully intentional. The thing about this list is that she starts off quite sensibly – there is nothing “adorable” about a woman getting a promotion – then very quickly descends into what I can only describe as the territory of she who screams misogyny at every opportunity. This is either because little Anna’s skull is as thick and hard as a week-old sanitary pad, or because she wants her readers to feel that they are oppressed and hence entitled.

Apparently, telling George Clooney “You’re so cool, I can’t believe you’re still single!” is a compliment, but saying the same to a woman is an insult…

“You’re so cool, how are you still single?” Because my Coolness is an ever-expanding supernova, enveloping and destroying every potential mate in its path, that’s why. Fuckface.”

Pointing out that a woman is not a raging psychotic is also a no-no, and so is pointing out that she has a pretty face, as doing so can only be done by men who think the woman in question has a body made of sewage and swamp mud.

“You have such a pretty face!” But I want to throw holy water on the rest of your hideous body, you disgusting beautiful-headed demon-woman.”

Er, yeah, whatever. Funny thing is, it’s hard to believe the horse-faced plain Jane who wrote the piece ever hears the first part of that – though it wouldn’t surprise me if she often heard the second. Frankly, the whole thing comes across as a woman whining about her own personal life while projecting all sorts of behaviors and negative intentions onto males. In other words, it comes across like a lot of other feminist whine-fests. If the former example wasn’t enough of a clue as to who this piece is really about, here’s another…

“You’re single because you’re too picky.” “You should aim more on your level, like the crazy guy who hangs out outside the local YMCA trying to smoke discarded cigarette butts.”

Truth hurts, don’t it? Throw in “unpleasant, petulant and whiny” and you have a pretty good description of the writer. As for the cigarette guy, I doubt he would be willing to lower himself to the level of someone who writes for Cosmo.

The feminist hilarity continues here.

 

Pigman’s Manager Gets Fooled, Tries To Make Amends

Pigman’s Manager Gets Fooled, Tries To Make Amends published on

So, after a hard day’s bludging, my manager Michael comes home, opens up his inbox and finds this email plea to sign a petition from some guy called Daniel Halfassed, I mean Daniel A’vard…

“It’s a sad day when a grown man in uniform feels the need to brutally bodyslam a 15 year old girl.

I’m still shocked after watching the CCTV footage. After the girl walks through an open gate, he and a group of officers chase after her — seconds later, the ticket inspector throws her against the fence, picks her up and body-slams her into the concrete. The group of officers stand around him looking on.

Yes, she was attempting to break the law by not paying for a ticket, but that is no excuse for his actions. How is throwing someone half your weight to the ground ever appropriate? He was angry and defensive, but even worse — Metro Trains has supported his actions saying the officer “exercised his functions reasonably.”

There was nothing reasonable about his actions. And it’s unbelievable that Metro Trains could condone this sort of violence towards passengers. Shockingly, after a complaint from the officer it’s now the 15 year-old girl being charged with assaulting the officer for slapping him.

This young girl could have been paralysed, acquired a brain injury, or worse. This kind of violence against anyone is unacceptable. Systemised and accepted violence is even worse — and it’s up to us, society, to say this is not tolerable and denounce violence wherever we see it. Authorised Officers often get a bad rap, but in this case it is justified. Metro Trains now has the opportunity to show some leadership by denouncing confrontational violence as a solution.

I’m asking Metro Trains to call to account the officer involved and provide anti-violence training to all Officers to prevent future abuse. Metro Trains should also offer counselling to any officers involved in violent incidents.”

 

So, being far too nice and liberal for his own good, Michael took a quick look at the video, thought “That’s bloody outrageous!” and signed the petition that the guy has put out there. Then, of course, someone at the MensRights subreddit pointed out that things are not quite as they seem, Mike took a slow look at the video and sure enough, the little shit hits the man first. She may even be trying to gouge his eyes, though that is not too clear. So now Michael finds himself in the embarrassing position of having signed a petition on behalf of someone who is, according to her own supporters’ footage, a violent criminal, all thanks to this Daniel A’vard guy who completely fails to point out that in between the girl going through the gate and the guy body-slamming her, the girls attacks the guy at least once. Nice one, Dan, after all, it’s not like a man has the right to defend himself from violent, possibly crippling, attacks. And don’t even get me started on the idea that if both protagonists had been female this might not have caused such a hubbub…

So in an attempt to make up for his mistake, Michael has started his own petition in support of the officer, which puts him (not to mention myself) in an odd position given how anti-authoritarian we both are. But the fact is that all sentient beings – be they man, pig, or Pigman – have the right to defend themselves against violent attacks, even if they are working for the State.

Petition here ( the good one, not the bad one)

Video below.

How The University of North Dakota Screwed Over One Young Man

How The University of North Dakota Screwed Over One Young Man published on

Four years after being falsely accused of rape by Jessica Denise Murray, Caleb Warner is still suffering.

The biggest mistake of Caleb’s young life came along on the 13th of December 2009, when he attended a frat party at the University of North Dakota. That’s where he met Jessica Denise Murray, the evil little turd who would proceed to fuck up his life for him. Caleb and snake-girl hooked up, as is apparently the custom these days, and before you know it he was being accused of rape! And to think, he didn’t even have to go down on her in front of a mobile phone camera!

And what was little Jessica’s motivation for making such an awful claim? Was she psychotic? Brain damaged from too many episodes of Keeping Up With The Kardashians? Possessed by the devil? (Don’t laugh, over 50% of Americans believe demonic possession is real.) No, she’s just a massive asshole. Seems that after a second hook up a few days later, Murray decided Warner should be her boyfriend. When he declined her offer, she treated him in a most unfriendly manner by telling the University that he had raped her! The university then set up “a disciplinary hearing,” no doubt the kind of affair where all the members of the tribunal wear hoods to cover their faces. The standard of evidence was one that added up to taking Jessica’s word for it, Caleb’s lawyer wasn’t even allowed to speak and, not unexpectedly, Caleb was judged to be a rapist and thrown out of the university. Meanwhile, the cops were carrying out a real investigation and they came to the conclusion that the only real criminal involved was Jessica. Being as dumb as she is evil, Jessica Denise Murray had gotten her stories mixed up, and had even sent Caleb a text offering to have it off with him after he supposedly raped her – rape must be quite a tasty dish, considering how many “victims” end up going back for seconds. These incongruences led to the police charging Jessica with making false allegations. Like Tawana Brawley before her, Jessica fled the state before she could be arrested so she has yet to pay for her crime, and unless she’s stupid enough to go back to North Dakota, she never will.

You would think that at this point the men and women in the hoods would humbly apologize and let the boy back into the Uni, but such is not the way of misandry. Despite the cops clearing the boy, the University held onto its finding that he was a scumbag rapist. Almighty Academia had judged the boy guilty, and logic and evidence could take a hike. The Uni even went so far as to claim that the police warrant for the arrest of turd-girl would not be “substantial new evidence” and that the police were making — wait for it — “an unproven allegation”! As opposed to the proven allegation against Warner, I suppose… When the cops are more rational than the people who run the Universities, that’s when you know things are truly and totally fucked up. Seriously, folks, don’t send your kids to Uni unless you want their brains turned into politically correct mush.

After this grotesque reaction, Caleb’s mother and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) teamed up to get the situation righted, and more than a year after the kangaroo court, the University was forced to vacate their decision and totally clear the boy. By then, though, Caleb was so traumatized by the entire experience that North Dakota U. was the last place he wanted to be. And you know how it is with these things, the mud sticks. As we saw with Amanda Marcotte and the Duke Boys ( I sympathize with them, but their show is shit,) and with Sarah Fick and the infamous case at Ohio University, there will always be scum who will continue to brand the accused a rapist even after he is cleared. So Caleb never went back, never got his degree, and even now finds it distressing to even drive past the Uni, the place where he was lynched by a cabal of feminist and pseudo-intellectual dirtbags who probably can’t even spell justice, much less administer it. That’s University life for young men these days, their entire future teeters on a precipice, and all it takes to send them crashing onto the rocks below is one evil little scumbag, a scumbag like Jessica Denise Murray.

 

Main source, which you will notice didn’t mention the criminal’s name.

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/america-tonight/america-tonight-blog/2013/10/31/for-the-falsely-accusedmovingonfromrapistbrandingachallenge.html

Secondary sources

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/11/06/the_politics_of_campus_sexual_assault_111968.html

 http://thefire.org/article/13758.html

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com.au/2011/10/caleb-warner-wont-return-to-und-even.html

http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/10978/publisher_ID/30/

 

Public Head Job Not Rape, Says Grand Jury

Public Head Job Not Rape, Says Grand Jury published on

Remember that weird thing a week or so ago where this guy went down on this girl while other people filmed the entire thing, then it ends up on the internet and the girl yells rape? Turns out the smiling girl in the video was actually a willing participant! Who would have thought it?

According to the authorities, not only does the video show her smiling and pushing the guy’s head towards her crotch, but at one point the guy actually asks her if he should stop and she says ‘No, go ahead, continue.’! This is what it has come to, a guy can do something sexual with a girl who is smiling, who actually asserts her consent in front of witnesses and on camera, and he can still end up being portrayed as a rapist by feminist-led lynch mobs. This is how rabidly anti-male western society has become, all it takes is a woman’s word and a young man is looking at a very bleak future. And make no mistake, this is not Puritanism, this is misandry. If the sexes had been reversed and she had gone down on him while he smiled and said it was fine with him, who the fuck would have taken him seriously if he had yelled rape? Nobody, that’s who. Women don’t lie about rape, and every man is a secret rapist, that’s what feminism has taught society over the last few decades and a huge number of people have taken the message to heart.

But such proven cases of false rape accusation do nothing to stop feminist hatred. All the evidence says it wasn’t rape, but the loons at Hollaback continue to assert it was. According to someone called Sarah Fick the jackasses at her branch of Hollaback are “very disappointed” at the outcome. Ficke also claims that the girl’s obvious consent means nothing and that…

“If she was drunk at all, she was too drunk to consent,”

But…but… the boy was drunk as well! So both of them were too drunk to consent! OMG, they are both rapists! Yet mysteriously, Fick neglects to call for charges to be laid against the girl for having raped the boy! By Fick’s standards, they are both rapists, yet she wants only one of them charged! Funny how in feminist eyes a female who is drunk can’t consent but a male who is drunk can consent. Are they trying to imply that men are somehow superior? No, what Fick and her kind are about is “empowering” women by giving them the ability to yell rape every time they do something pervy and regrettable. And if the idea that only a drunk woman is unable to consent gets a few female rapists off the hook, I’m sure Fick won’t be crying too loudly about it.

Fick also claims that…

“If she was too drunk to remember anything, she was definitely too drunk to consent.”

Ah, but here is the thing. Was she too drunk to remember, or is that another way to absolve herself of blame? We have only the word of a girl who is now a proven liar, and even if the memory loss is genuine how do we know she was already that drunk at the time of the recorded incident? After the incident, she and the boy went off to his room and stayed there for three hours ( like Assange’s accusers, yet another rape victim who likes hanging out with the rapist after the crime), and that’s more than enough time to imbibe enough booze to make the whole week disappear. Again, it’s a typical feminist attempt to absolve women of blame while at the same time branding an innocent young man a dirtbag.

The news that there won’t be any charges is welcome, but there are still a couple of troubling aspects to this. First, the girl is not being charged with a false rape accusation that could have gotten the boy himself raped –  I hear rumors about that kind of thing occasionally happening to handsome young men who end up in jail – despite it being the one crime which we know for certain did take place. Today’s punishment is tomorrow’s deterrent, and by not punishing the girl for the evil thing she did, the law is telling other girls of equally low morality that they too can make such accusations with impunity. The second worrying aspect is that the University is conducting their own investigation. Given how low the standards of “evidence” are in such situations, it wouldn’t surprise me if the marsupials on the University Court simply took the girl’s word at face value and threw the boy out of school. Chances are, of course, that we will never learn the result of that particular inquisition as the media’s attention will have moved on to the next salacious bit of Hollywood gossip, or news of Beyonce photobombing yet another innocent fan.

 

 

Primary Sidebar

Secondary Sidebar