Skip to content

One Million Homophobic Harpies go after Marvel and DC

One Million Homophobic Harpies go after Marvel and DC published on

Not happy with making total and utter fools of themselves over Archie Comics’ gay character Kevin Keller, the gaggle of idiots at One Million Moms are now on the warpath against Marvel and DC.

It seems that the latter is about to reveal that one of their characters is gay, and the hysterical womb-wielders at O.M.M are having fits as to who it may be. Will it be Superman? Batman? Wonder Dyke? Probably not — the market risk would be too great, far more likely to be one of the company’s lesser lights. My guess would be Bat Mite. After all, an elf isn’t too far from a fairy…

 

Meanwhile across at Marvel, gay Canadian Northstar — I can just see the twitty twats at O.M.M snickering snidely that a ā€œgay Canadianā€ is a redundancy, or at least I could if I thought the word ā€œredundancyā€ was in their vocabularies — is going to do the Kevin Keller by marrying another guy. These two imminent catastrophes have occasioned much weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth amongst the conservative harpies, who seem to fear their ten year old sons will turn pink…

ā€œChildren desire to be just like superheroes. Children mimic superhero actions and even dress up in costumes to resemble these characters as much as possible. Can you imagine little boys saying, “I want a boyfriend or husband like X-Men?”

First, there is no character called ā€œX-Men,ā€ and secondly — kids? Most of the people reading these things are teens and adults — the days when it was mostly ten year old kids are long gone. As for the few children who are still able to afford these expensive little pamphlets, so what? If the sexual preferences of superheroes had a significant influence on whether or not someone grew up to be straight or gay, all the gay kids who grew up reading comics would be straight — just like their childhood idols!

Apparently these squirrel-brained wonders are basing their views on that most famous of comic books, the Bible…

ā€œThese companies are heavily influencing our youth by using children’s superheroes to desensitize and brainwash them in (sic) thinking that a gay lifestyle choice is normal and desirable. As Christians, we know that homosexuality is a sin (Romans 1:26-27).ā€

Yes… gays are sinful, the world was made in six days by an angry old man who lives in the sky, curious women get turned to salt, and Fred Flintstone was a real person who co-habited with a dinosaur…

Original blitherings here


 

Martha Rendell – Death by Hydrochloric Acid

Martha Rendell – Death by Hydrochloric Acid published on 2 Comments on Martha Rendell – Death by Hydrochloric Acid

Martha Rendell was an Australian serial killer, a sadistic piece of scum who in the early 1900s killed three of her de-facto husband’s children by coating the inside of their throats with diluted hydrochloric acid.

Rendell had stolen the children’s father, one ThomasĀ  Morris, away from his wife, who was then kicked out of the house by her idiot husband and forbidden to see the children – sort of like the modern Family Court with the sexes reversed.

Martha was a monster of a woman who delighted in abusing the children and who seemed to have no motive other than the pleasure she derived from torturing them. One neighbor even claimed that on several occasionsĀ  she had peeked in Martha’s window to see what all the screaming was about, and had seen Martha smiling with delight as she watched one of her victims writhing in pain. Other neighbors claimed to have heard Martha laughing over the children’s screams.

Rendell’s method was as simple as it was cruel. She would simply place a small amount of acid in the victim’s drink. This would lead to a sore throat which the family doctor would then order treated by coatings of a certain medication, a medication for which Martha then substituted the diluted hydrochloric acid. The acid being diluted it took her young victims weeks to die, though it remains unclear whether they died from the acid itself or from starvation due to not being able to eat.

Rendell’s luck ran out when she tried the same acid-in-the-tea trick on the fourth Morris child, a teenage boy who unlike his father knew scum when he saw it. Young George Morris ran for his life to his real mother’s house, and his disappearance led the already suspicious neighbors to call the police, who eventually uncovered the sickening killing spree and charged Martha with murder. In September of 1909 Rendell was found guilty and sentenced to hang, a punishment which seems rather genteel compared to her crimes – a nice long bath in some diluted acid would seem much more fitting to this writer.

Due to the two fatty deposits on Rendell’s chest the death sentence led to much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments, with various baby-kissers and clergymen making it clear that a woman’s life is worth more than that of three children, but decency won out and on the 6th of October 1909 Martha Rendell was led to the noose by two female attendants, presumably so that she wouldn’t get felt up on her way to hell…

Most of this information was sourced from ā€œAustralia’s Serial Killersā€ by Paul Kidd.

Frances Knorr – 19th Century Killer Nanny

Frances Knorr – 19th Century Killer Nanny published on

 

Australian GynoBeast Frances Knorr wanted some cash, so she decided the way to make it was to look after other people’s children. Or to be more accurate, pretend to look after other people’s children.

Child minding in 19th Century Victoria was a very different proposition to its modern day equivalent. Parents, usually single mothers, would pay to have their babies looked after on a long term, full time basis. The mother would make an initial payment of 5 to 20 pounds then smaller monthly payments, and would visit the babies at certain pre-arranged times – a situation which couldn’t have been much fun for either the mothers or the babies.

Unfortunately, there were numerous cases in which the so-called carer was only in it for the money and the babies were abandoned, left to starve, murdered outright, or if they were lucky, sold off to childless couples. Knorr was one such ā€œbaby farmerā€ as the press of the time dubbed these dirtbags. She would take the money, kill the babies in her charge, then move on to another address and start all over again. Her baby-killing spree finally came to an end when a man occupying one of her former residences decided to plant a vegetable garden and dug up something other than an angry gopher. What Mr. Clay instead found, that September day in 1893, was a decomposing baby girl with a rope around her neck. Ā After the police were called locals told them that Knorr had also resided in a nearby house. When that house’s garden was dug up the police found more dead babies, this time two boys who had been suffocated.

Eventually Knorr was found guilty and sentenced to hang for the murders of these three babies, though it is estimated that she may have killed as many as 13 children. Because she was a woman there was much public controversy, and Melbourne hangman William Perrins was so distressed at the social repercussions of killing one of The Important Sex that he killed himself instead! A couple of days before Perrins was to carry out the execution, he got drunk, stood over a sink, and slit his own throat! If nothing else, this pitiable act shows that we have made some progress in the last one hundred years – I don’t recall any Yank slaying himself rather than a murderer for fear of being ostracized because the killer in question was female! No siree! These days we don’t ostracize men for executing women, we just hand women life when a man would get death, and a slap on the wrist when a man would get life!

Most of this information was sourced from ā€œAustralia’s Serial Killersā€ by Paul Kidd.

Details of hangman’s suicide found here.

Racist Cops Sued For Ignoring Harmless Black Man

Racist Cops Sued For Ignoring Harmless Black Man published on

Darnel Harris, a young black man residing in New York, Ā has launched a multi million dollar lawsuit against the city and the police force, alleging discrimination and neglect occasioning emotional distress.

Mr. Harris says he feels left out of the traditional slaying of young black males so popular in the U.S…

ā€œWhat’s a brother gotta do to get his head blown off ā€˜round here? I’ve tried it all man! I’ve tried driving around minding my own business! I’ve tried going to the train station and lying face down on the ground! I’ve even tried hanging around 7/11s wearing a hoodie, and nothing! No bullets, no beatings, not even a ā€œGet yo’ black ass back to the jungle!ā€ I’m starting to feel like I’m the only black man in the country that isn’t getting any attention from the authorities. It’s starting to affect me at work. I can’t concentrate properly, I just sit there thinking ā€œWhat’s wrong with me? Why won’t anyone shoot me dead?ā€ The other day I was so distracted I tried to phone my dad on a ham sandwich!ā€

Mr. Harris, who has been in therapy for the last five months, tells us that despite the lawsuit he hasn’t yet given up on being shot dead. ā€œThere’s always hope, you know? Next thing I’m gonna do is go to a senior citizen’s home, wait for a police car to come along, then help a little old lady across the street. If that doesn’t do the trick I don’t know what will!ā€

Hand Wringing at Ms Magazine Online

Hand Wringing at Ms Magazine Online published on

What is it with Ms Magazine and weird views on animals? First there was the bizarre rant on My Little Pony, and now some twit seems to think that it is somehow sexist or misogynist to use the simulated torture of a woman as part of a campaign against animal testing of cosmetics.

A cosmetics company called Lush set up a publicity stunt in which some folks in white coats pretended to carry out cosmetic testing on a young woman in a leotard, then used said stunt to attract attention to a petition against such practices. Apparently this would have been fine had the ā€œtest subjectā€ been a male, but since she is a woman, the writer asks this rather easily answered question…

ā€œBut why must the stand-ins for tortured animals always be young women?ā€

Well, call me a misogynist if you must, but it may have something to do with Ā the fact that animals used in such unnecessary testing are being tortured on behalf of one sex in particular. Which sex could that be? Are there many men wearing all this garbage on their faces? Not outside of drag joints there aren’t, so the answer is clear — the fictional victims are female because the real victims are being tortured in the name of female vanity. Animals are suffering so that a bunch of shallow and superficial women can pretend to be hotties when they are in fact notties.

And here’s what really pisses me off Ā about animal testing — how the fuck does anyone come to the conclusion that women don’t already have more than enough of this crap? Why torture animals to test new cosmetics when we know from decades of women’s use that there are already hundreds of safe cosmetics on the market? Yes, that’s right, it’s our friends the corporate bastards again. Make the public want something new and useless, so that they will throw away the useless garbage they bought last year and replace it with some brand new crap. What it all adds up to is this…

Corporate Greed + Female Vanity = Bugs Bunny being tortured to death!

There’s a petition here, and below is the video. Believe it or not, the gals at Ms ā€œcould barely finish watching the video.ā€ Christ, these are probably the kind of women who faint when they watch the movie Gremlins! And that’s just when Gizmo is on the screen — soon as the gnarly title characters make their appearance, these latter day suffragettes burst into tears and run to the nearest police station!