Skip to content

Catherine Kieu Becker is a Castrating Scumbag

Catherine Kieu Becker is a Castrating Scumbag published on

Not happy with cutting off her husband’s penis Catherine Kieu Becker then threw it in the garbage disposal, presumably so it couldn’t be reattached.

The little turd then told the authorities that he “deserved it,” perhaps because he was divorcing her,  though once she lawyers up we can no doubt expect a laundry list of imaginary offenses with which to vilify the victim and minimize the crime.

If American men had any self respect left they would lynch the cow, but as we all know by now most of them probably agree that he “deserved it,” and will be having a good laugh instead. And that brings me to the question of what should be the penalty for cutting off a man’s penis.

Perhaps the penalty for such a crime should be death, at least in the US where the idea of the death penalty for rape has at times been proposed. After all, you can get over a rape, but you can’t get over having your penis cut off and minced. We must also consider the hate crime aspect of this particular type of offense. What Becker did was not merely an attack on her husband but also on you, on me, your sons, your brothers. It was in short a collective “fuck you” to the male sex, just as some racists dragging a black man behind a truck till his head tears off is a collective “fuck you” to all black people.

No doubt there are those who will argue that there must be some psychiatric or psychological explanation for this GynoBeast’s actions, that something is wrong with the poor dear. And of course they are right, there is something wrong with her – she’s a scumbag.

More here

No kidding please, we’re Australian…

No kidding please, we’re Australian… published on

Oh dear, the Land of Oz is turning into Old Blighty. As many already know, the UK has some ridiculously strict defamation laws, and if this recent case is anything to go by Australia is going down the same slippery slope.

A couple of years ago a well known comedian called Mick Molloy made a joke about some thin-skinned woman cheating on her husband. That’s all it was, a joke put out there by a man who nobody in their right mind takes seriously. Yet the woman,  failed Labor politician Nicole Cornes, has just won an $85,000 lawsuit against Molloy and the TV station that broadcast the alleged defamation.

What this means is that in Australia, unless you have a corporation backing you, you had better not say anything negative about anyone who can afford a good lawyer, no matter how obvious it would be to a reasonable person that you weren’t being serious. This seems to me bad news for Australian political bloggers as well as for the independent press, who would easily be ruined by such a settlement. It’s also bad news for the lower strata of society, since as we have seen time and again, the mainstream media cares little for anyone other than the rich, the powerful, and a few fashionable causes amongst which neither the poor nor homeless are to be found.

A caveat to American bloggers – an Australian called Joe Gutnick once successfully sued an American publication for defaming him, but he did so under the stricter Australian laws. You heard me. Gutnick sued a bunch of  Americans not under their country’s law, but under ours. Why did he succeed? Because the allegations may have been made by Americans writing in America, but they did so on a website, which means he was being defamed in Australia whenever someone viewed the offending site. At least that was the excuse. And Gutnick’s target  wasn’t some small fish either, it was Dow Jones, so keep in mind that you are less liable to our fascist laws, but by no means immune.

Article here.

Crazy Slut Named Most Influential Weirdo

Crazy Slut Named Most Influential Weirdo published on

The US continues its descent into madness with the shock announcement that the ironically yet aptly named (think about it) Lady Gaga has become the world’s most powerful celebrity!

According to Forbes, little Stefani Germanotta is now the idiot most often listened to by all the other idiots. In a display of the American woman’s complete and utter oppression, the current idiot attained her position by knocking another bewombed moron – queen of daytime blither Oprah Winfrey – out of the top spot.

Given that Gaga’s case of feminist rabies has yet to progress to the point where she becomes totally and irredeemably loathsome this may be good news for men, if only in the short term. We must remember that Gaga is only 25 years old and that feminists are like buckets of horse urine left standing in the sun – the older they get the worse they smell.

More here.

Baby Microwaving Maggot Gets Pussy Pass

Baby Microwaving Maggot Gets Pussy Pass published on

Unspeakably foul China Arnold  was in a bad mood, so she stuck her one month-old daughter in the microwave oven, turned it on and watched the baby cook to death.

After several years and two guilty verdicts this subhuman thing was last month handed life without parole when she could instead have been sentenced to death. If anyone knows of a man who killed a baby in such a horrible way and who, like Arnold, was found to be of average intelligence and sound mind, let me know. After I pick myself up off the floor I will retract the bit about the pussy pass.

And in case you are wondering what could have triggered such indescribable rage, it was a simple argument with her boyfriend over the baby’s paternity. America being an anti-male nightmare, it is not beyond the pale to imagine that the jury which handed her the pass may very well have been placing part of the blame on the father. Because you know, if he hadn’t pissed her off she would never have done something so awful.

During the trial, ambulance chaser Kevin Lennen claimed that his client should be spared the death penalty as such should be meted out only to “the worst offenders.” One has to wonder just how baroque an imagination this man has to be able to conceive of a worse way to kill anyone, much less an infant. I wonder also if Lennen has left instructions in his will that if he is ever murdered in any way that isn’t worse than being cooked alive the prosecution should not seek the death penalty? Probably not, but he could no doubt explain that away using one of those twists of logic that have earnt lawyers the respect of the community…

So what would have been a fitting punishment? Execution by incineration, of course.

More here