Skip to content

Otep Leaves The Kitchen In A Huff!

Otep Leaves The Kitchen In A Huff! published on 2 Comments on Otep Leaves The Kitchen In A Huff!

As regular readers will know, i am a big fan of the old heavy metal, and have had some nasty things to say about Otep Shamaya and her shameful song about the Menz.  Recently our blonde battery hoarder became irate at  some metal dude at who posted this at The Gauntlet and reacted by spitting the dummy, grabbing her dolly, and storming home to mummy!

Now, i would never have picked Otep as the kind of wimp who would do this and i’ve said so at The Gauntlet where i also took some swipes at her response to this bloke. This is no biggie boys, just me having some fun by baiting an angry bull-dyke, the kind of thing i (er, i mean my manager Michael Claymore) used to do at Glennsacks.com with the feminists and the right wing extremists.

So here is my comment…

“What a pussy. I knew she was a psycho but it didn’t occur to me that she was also the kind of wimp who ran as soon as a dude stood up to her (too much time spent in the company of the “men” in her band i suppose). She’s pretty tough when she’s writing about wiping out all the menz, but not so tough when she has to tackle one, even with several miles of cable between her and her antagonist.

Here are some  observations on what she wrote in her response to the response…

“I want to begin this by noting that I have absolutely no idea who you are.”
This probably means “I am someone and you are nobody, and i am hoping this gives me an edge with both you and the readers.”

“the scrawling flatulence you scribed”
The first of what will no doubt be many references to the baser bodily functions.

“To the meat …”
If there is one thing i never thought i would see this woman write it’s “To the meat”.

“Your staggering lack of insight into my denouncements of President Obama and his administration is stunningly transparent.”
Notice here that insight (Websters -1 : the power or act of seeing into a situation : penetration, 2 : the act or result of apprehending the inner nature of things or of seeing intuitively) is not the proper word to use, but insight just makes her sound so much more impressive than “ignorance” would.

Here we see more of her  childish obsession with waste references…

“colostomy bags better known as Republicans.”

This  seems not only emotionally stunted but also ironic given that she has just called Bush a “Brat King”

“The invincible ignorance you have displayed here is pathetic and humorous at best.”
Unlike the deep wisdom contained in “Menocide“.

“You seem to revel in silly, pedantic, abusive efforts that sporadically sprinkle about in only substantiating your absolute failure of thinking.”
What does this even mean? It makes no sense once you get past “efforts”. And to think this woman is considered a poet.  Affirmative action anyone?

“I mean, ye gods man, do some fucking research! Or maybe you just enjoy the smell of your own inadequacy and secretly hope someone like me will rub your nose in it?”
There it is again, the obsession with excrement. Otep is  what, 25? Far too old for this kind of thing – most mentally healthy people give up the obsession  with scat references some time during junior high.

“Or, maybe you just enjoy being a flaccid shit-filled reactionary?”
Theres the scat again.  This kind of thing is about as mature as calling him a “Doody Pants”.

“I don’t know. I don’t understand nonsensical bullshit nor do I speak the language of fools.”

And the Pope doesn’t speak German.

“And as for your odd, meandering rantings about my music, well, I truly do not care. Why should I? I don’t know you. I’ve never heard of you.You know much more about MY work than I know about whatever it is that you do.”
Theres the “Im Somebody, you’re Nobody ” again. Funny how hierarchical she is for a feminist. Here i was thinking that was the kind of thing only we “prostate gods” indulged in! Otep’s  political convictions seem to leave her whenever convenient. I am reminded of Jane Fonda’s ads for skin care products – if men tell women to look good it’s bad, if Fonda tells 68 year old women to look good it’s cool. I suspect that if Otep ever sells out and  goes mainstream she will  release a celebrity fragrance just like Brit Brit and Paris Hilton have.

“I do, however, want to thank you for helping spread the word on my new album. Publicity is publicity, am I right? Indeed.”
That’s what Brit Brit thought when she shaved her head, and now everyone thinks she has bats in her belfry.

“Smash The Control Machine is in stores now, and I am very proud of it.”
She should be, from what i’ve seen on you-tube it’s almost as good as “Ascension”, which if these “Im your better” statements are anything to go by should have been called “Condescension”.

“Feel free to contact your friends at The Gauntlet (again) and vomit forth another ineffective,masturbatory entry”
There’s the juvenile obsession with icky stuff again, and now, in the best junior high style, jerking off is tossed in for good measure . Also, if the dude is so ineffective why is she so inflamed?

” but I am much too busy to slip & slide with you. So, don’t expect a reply.”
This probably means “Im scared of you, please leave me alone or i will cry.”

“I’ve slummed enough with this one.”
What a mean little girl!

Face it, honey,  you could check into a trailer park for microcephallic psychopaths and still not be slumming.

Thank you for reading my swinish oinkings, and don’t waste your money on her album – just record it off MTV.”

Well, that was fun to write. Incidentally , in a few days Otep will be joined in the shameful ranks of Misandrist Of The Month by a certain Englishwoman. Wish she was as much fun to insult as Otep, but unfortunately these upper class broads don’t swear much.

Hate Crime In England

Hate Crime In England published on

From the land of hate-mongering Harriet Harman, comes a story of clear and undeniable misandry.

Seems some dykish looking women — probably dykes — thought a bloke had whistled at them, so they beat him up! Doesn’t seem like a good excuse for assault to me, but apparently it did to Vanessa Delaney,Claire Edwards and Sally Pawson, as well as to the idiot judge, who gave them three month suspended sentences!

What makes this a hate crime? The fact that while the psycho Otep wannabes were beating him up they were shouting anti-male abuse such as “All men are idiots!”. Imagine a bunch of guys beating up a woman while shouting misogynist crap and getting anything other than jail time! Unlikely, if not actually impossible.

Apart from serving as yet another example of how anti-male the West has become, this should also serve as a lesson – if  three women, especially if they look like these three do, come at you, flatten the bitches. The days of  angry women squealing “Oh, you awful man!” then walking away in a huff are over. The gyno-beast is out of its cage and it’s at least as vile as its male equivalent.

More here

Evil Clown Alert!

Evil Clown Alert! published on

In the U.K, children’s entertainers such as clowns and magicians will soon be required to enter their names into a database, just in case they turn out to be child molesters.

These guys already have to undergo checks by the Criminal Records Bureau, checks that can cost as much as £60, and now under another initiative which goes into effect in October, they will have to fork out another £64 to add their names to a second database administered by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA).

It is expected that within five years there will be over 11 million names on this database, supposedly to protect kiddies from evil clowns, but i see it as nothing more than another  way to stigmatize men by portraying all men who work with children as potential predators – after all is there a similar scheme for female-dominated areas like child care and nursing? Let’s guess…

Found it at IFeminists, the only feminists that aren’t evil clowns.

Stephany Alexander Sucks

Stephany Alexander Sucks published on

Who the hell is Stephany Alexander, i hear you ask?  She’s the cowpat of a woman who set up “Womansavers.com”, previously known by the far more descriptive name of “Manhaters.com.”

Amongst the dubious services offered by this site is the opportunity for women to accuse any man they take a dislike to of being abusive or unfaithful, no evidence or other legal niceties needed.The women are allowed to use the man’s real name and his real photo, and so far 40,000 men have been put into this database. And it is always a man -the rules clearly specify that one can not post accusations about women. This is no obscure little feminist website, Womansavers gets 90 thousand visits per month, and the guys at the top of the list have had the accusations against them viewed hundreds of thousands of times- that’s a lot of vilification for something completely unproven.

Because you need to be logged in to Womansavers to see these pages i have provided screen captures rather than the usual links, and of course i have reduced the men’s names to initials…

Now, just how easy is it to get a man’s name onto their database? This easy…

The entire thing can be done anonymously –  once a week all the IP addresses attached to posts are deleted so by the time this post is published at the end of July, my poster’s IP address will be gone and no matter how serious the allegations,  the poster can’t be tracked down.  An account was opened using a false female name and an email set up for this purpose alone, then a post containing  an accusation about a non-existent man by the name of  ”Fred Megatronowiz” was created, a photo of Jean Claude Van Damme was uploaded, and  poor Fred was described as a liar and a cheat as well as a “giant robot trying to take over the universe” ! But hey, it could have been YOUR name, YOUR photo, and the entry could have accused you of being a rapist and child molester, and thousands of women would have access to that accusation! And it costs no money to do this – that’s how easy it is to wreck a man’s good name these days.

Here is a screen capture of the resulting post…

Interestingly, even though vilifying poor old Fred is free, un-vilifying him would cost 25 dollars (to remove the post) or 10 dollars (to edit the post) and only the person who posted the accusation – or the “survey” as they like to call it – can remove or edit it, not Fred himself.

Why the fee? Could it be that this woman is laying aside her sisterly motives in order to fleece women who post statements they later wish to remove? So much for sisterhood. And yes, she says it goes to charity but the problem is she has her own charity for abused women, children and animals (!) so who knows how much of this money is finding its way into her pockets?

Think you can sue her? Alas no. Apparently the only people liable for false statements are the ones making the accusations and as good old Stephany sees to it that the IP addresses are deleted after a week, good luck in finding that bitch who branded you a sheep-humping freak!

Little Ms Manhater is really raking in the cash by vilifying men – she also has a book in which she, amongst other things, tells you how to get a free background check on a man before you date him. Not after he gives you reason to think he’s up to something shady, mind you, but just because he’s a man and therefore suspect. She also seems to have affiliations with a service that keeps track of you during a date so that if you don’t get back by a certain time it is assumed you are dining with Ted Bundy and the National Guard is called out.

More about this vile woman here.

The Ultimate Female Sentencing Discount – Serial Killer Hellen Moore

The Ultimate Female Sentencing Discount – Serial Killer Hellen Moore published on

I know that we have seen some truly  egregious examples of the female sentencing discount recently, but the case i am about to detail is by far, bar none, the worst case of the female sentencing discount i have ever come across – the case  of Australian serial killer Helen Patricia Moore.

In May of 1979, in the Western Suburbs of Sydney, 17 year old Helen Patricia Moore suffocated Suzanne McIntosh, a 16 month old cousin whom she was babysitting – the child’s death was at the time put down to cot death.

In January of 1980 Moore attempted to suffocate yet another of her babysitting charges, 12 month old Nicholas Vaughan. Having thought her latest attempt at murder a success, Helen Moore went back to calmly watching TV. A while later the baby boy started crying, she called the ambulance and the boy made a full recovery.

Despite this latest suspicious incident, the babysitting jobs kept coming and on February 1st 1980 Helen suffocated two year old Aaron Crocker with a pillow, again failing to finish the job properly. Little Aaron survived but was left blind and crippled and died several years later as a result of Moore’s attack.

A few weeks later on February 24th 1980, two year old Rachel Hay died while in the care of Helen Moore.

In march of 1980, Helen’s  seven year old brother Peter was found dead at the bottom of the stairs in the family home, only then did Helen’s mother Jesse realize something was up. She called the police and the whole story came out, with Helen quickly confessing first to the murder of Peter then to the other crimes.

Now here’s the thing, when Helen Moore was sentenced in 1980 the judge gave her life, but a dozen years later she sought a sentence review and that original  sentence was reduced to 13 years and nine months, and in 1993 Helen Moore was  given parole! Think about it, this is a serial killer who preyed on children and they let her out of jail after just 13 years. Could someone please find me a case wherein a male serial killer, especially one who preys on small children, is allowed to go free after only thirteen years in jail, even if he was 17 at the time of the murders? I seriously doubt that such a case can be found, as i am something of a true crime fan and i’ve never even heard of such a thing.

And just to underline how pro-woman and disregarding of children’s safety our western patriarchies are, a year or two into her parole she got pregnant, and even though they took the baby away from her for a very brief period, it was soon handed back to her, despite the fact that she was a killer of small children. Now if that doesn’t show the precedence that women’s rights take over the safety of children, nothing does. Helen Moore’s parole period ran out in 2005, and even though i haven’t been able to confirm it, it is highly likely that she was set free, and that right now, out there in Australia somewhere, a serial killer is living free and easy, and why? Because our society places such a high value on women and such a low value on men and children, that’s why.

By the way, don’t bother googling Helen Moore’s name – all i could find was an article about how they briefly took the daughter away from her when she was born, all else i got from a book called “Australia’s Serial Killers” by an Australian crime writer called Paul B. Kidd. The book was published in 2001, hence my not being able to confirm that she did make it through the parole period.