Skip to content

Period Dolls Now?

Period Dolls Now? published on
Yes, that kid really is putting a maxi pad on her doll's panties...
Yes, that kid really is putting a maxi pad on her doll’s panties…

Lammily, the doll for people who want their daughters to grow up to be politically correct idiots, now has a “period party” pack. Lammily, for those fortunate enough to not know, was designed to be a fashion doll with real-life looks but somehow manages to look better than 90% of real-life girls, and was meant to represent the average girl, yet is not called Kate, or Susan, or even Madison!

All squeamish parents can now rest easy. Thanks to a remarkable combination of SJW bullshit and Amerikan capitalism, such folks now can explain all that menstrual unpleasantness by just giving their kid a doll who comes complete with her own maxi pads and a big colorful chart explaining the ins and outs of menstruation. Just what every ten year old girl wants, right? Still, it could have been worse. Lammily could have been anatomically correct, in which case the period pack would have come with tiny, tiny, little tampons that the kid would then be expected to shove right up Lammily’s you-know-what.

In a further attempt to have their doll reflect the real world, the company has announced that a future edition of Lammily will abuse her children, cheat on her husband, then divorce him and make off with the kids, the house, and half his money.

As for the video, I stopped as soon as dad mentioned “dope beats.” I do not need to see a couple of middle aged white idiots trying to rap. Hell, I don’t even like it when it’s a young black idiot! As for dad telling his daughter that she will always be his little TT, well, that’s just bloody inappropriate!

Get your panties wet right here.

Famous Baboon Under Attack After Claiming Famous Cow Is Shrill

Famous Baboon Under Attack After Claiming Famous Cow Is Shrill published on

The baboon, who is best known to world audiences as the star of the TV series “Life In The Monkey House,’ recently gave an interview in which he described the increasingly shrill Hillary Clinton as “shrill.” This led to some paranoid woman (you know the kind, the sort who wears a rape whistle everywhere she goes) telling him that “women” (by which she means herself and her feminist friends, many of whom are no doubt very shrill) find the use of the word to be “sexist.” To this the baboon, usually the kind of monkey who does not kowtow to PC pressure, responded that there are men he also finds shrill. Way to go, Donald Trump, you big pussy! The appropriate response would have been, “Yeah, I called her shrill! So what? I’ve got lots of male-specific insults up my expensive sleeve, but they aren’t the kind of words I can say on TV!”

Trump later offered to kiss the whiny journalist’s ass and walk across some burning coals, all as penance for his dreadful sin. Just goes to show how out of control the worship of women is in the West – even a famously un-PC man will wimp out when accused of not treating women with the reverence due to such sacred creatures.

Baboon meets feminist here. Which has the lower IQ is anyone’s guess.

Feminists Freak Out Over Silly Old Man’s Silly Old Comment

Feminists Freak Out Over Silly Old Man’s Silly Old Comment published on

In the most horrific geriatric attack on the female sex since Tim Hunt quipped that women scientists were too likely to burst into tears, the Dalai Lama has outraged the feminist world by suggesting that if there were to be a female Dalai Lama she had better be one seriously hot babe!

The shocking comment was delivered as part of an interview during which the 80 year old seemed to be under the impression that he was being interviewed for a job as Guatemala’s next President. The condemnation was swift and righteous, and soon the old miscreant found himself being beaten senseless with dozens of expensive, brick-filled handbags.

Vivienne Hayes, CEO of the Women’s Resource Centre, responded by screaming hysterically that…

“It’s disappointing that any woman’s ability to take on a leadership role should be determined by her appearance. This seems to be a common obsession across the media, given some of the comments about women in politics.”

Nice leap from one senile old man’s comment to a generalization about the media, madam. She then adds…

“We are concerned that society is in fact going backwards in terms of women’s equality, and will keep tirelessly campaigning against this.”

She later explained that by going backwards she actually meant going forwards, and that she is a great supporter of the education gap and would like to see measures implemented to ensure that by next Tuesday 90% of British degrees are going to women.

Nicole Rowe, spokeswoman for Progressive Women, and owner of an online store specializing in tin foil hats, blithered…

“…we’re surprised and greatly disappointed that a man of such compassion and wisdom could express such a retrograde opinion. Perpetuating the antiquated idea that women are primarily useful as ornaments, as in the parlance ‘Women should be seen but not heard’, only adds fuel to the manifold discrimination women still face to this day.”

Nice try, Madam Goony Bird, but nobody said anything about women shutting the hell up – though, in your case, they probably should.

Someone called Caroline Criado-Perez, a creature best known for trying to get more women’s heads put on British bank notes (there’s a life well spent,) responded with typical feminist eloquence on Twitter (where else?) by asking…

“Is ‘lol’ appropriate?”

It was later discovered that Criado-Perez’ comment was not in response to the old llama’s faux pas, but rather to the fact that Western feminism has become a cabal of pinheaded women whining about matters so trivial that even feminists themselves can no longer repress their laughter.

Source

Talk Radio Loon Objects To Gay Secretary of Army

Talk Radio Loon Objects To Gay Secretary of Army published on

Some guy called Michael Savage, whose name I vaguely recall from the days when I used to get many of my laughs by watching Fox News, has declared Obama to be a lunatic after the latter appointed a gay guy Secretary of the Army. I don’t know why Savage is so upset – secretary sounds exactly like the kind of job a gay guy would be right for. But he doesn’t see it that way, and claims Obama is not only a lunatic but also a psychopath. While I agree with him on the latter I see no evidence of the former. And as for the latter, the evidence lies not in the appointment of this Streisand-loving poodle-walker but rather in the body count racked up by O’s beloved army of drones.

Savage also expressed concern that the army’s image might suffer…

“Next thing you know, this guy will have all the soldiers wearing tank tops and gold lamé hot pants! And can you imagine the marching drills? He’ll have the marines marching to songs by ABBA! And their new mascot will be not the noble bulldog but that sea-dwelling pervert Spongebob Squarepants! And what will that lead to? The US army will become an international laughing stock and the whole world will end up hating us. We can’t have that!”

Get your right wing nutjob right here.

And in case you’ve forgotten what gold lamé hot pants look like, here are some antipodean reminders. You’re welcome.

kylie gold lame hot pants
kylie yet again

kylie hot pants 3 jpg

There Goes My Respect For Noam Chomsky!

There Goes My Respect For Noam Chomsky! published on

Like many who realize the world is seriously fucked up, I have long taken Noam Chomsky to be one of the few credible voices on things like Amerikan imperialism. Now, I am not so certain. Today I bumped into a video in which the now highly suspect Chomsky condemns pornography as being degrading to women. He cites as evidence nothing, mentioning only that all you have to do is “take a look at the pictures.” This suggests that he has been looking at some very selectively chosen pictures, probably sent to him by some women’s studies professor at MIT. That’s his first bit of dishonesty – portraying the exception as the rule. Keep in mind, Chomsky is no fool. If he is taking the exception to be the rule, it is because he wants to do so. He is more than smart enough to wonder if these pictures are representative or not.

But then it gets worse. He actually goes on to compare women working in porn to women working in Chinese sweat shops! No way is this man too dumb to realize that there is a huge difference between the two groups. The Chinese women live in a country where you have to take what you can get to stay alive. The porn stars ( I assume he is speaking of Amerikan ones, as he is an Amerikan and the only porn he mentions is Hustler ) live in a country which is far richer and which worships youth and female beauty. A country in which a good looking young woman can get paid hundreds of dollars a week to sit behind a counter and look pretty! The women in the porn industry do what they do not because they have no choice other than to do porn or starve in the streets, but because it is easier to make thousands of dollars per day lying on your back than it is to make a hundred dollars a day working in a shop or an office. And then, in typically hysterical feminist fashion, he even brings up the fact that some Chinese women work 15 hours and day and then die in a fire! When the fuck has that happened in porn? “Porn Set Catches Fire – Dozens of Women Killed,” is a headline I have yet to read. But it gets worse, more hysterical, more dishonest – Chomsky then goes on to compare porn stars to starving children! Apparently, telling a starving child, “If you let me abuse you, I will give you food,” is analogous to telling a good looking young woman, “If you do my porn movies you will make 200 thousand a year instead of 30 thousand a year.” The sheer offensiveness of such a comparison leaves me almost speechless. Exploiting the suffering of children to make some sort of lame point on behalf of feminism? Disgusting. Truly disgusting.

But this goes beyond Chomsky’s pathetic white knighting, it goes to the heart of his credibility. The man is now a proven liar. It is that simple. Unlike many online feminists, he is not a pinhead with a degree in Wiminz Studies from some minor university. There is virtually no chance that the man is simply wrong, as opposed to lying, when he draws analogies between porn stars and starving children! This then makes one wonder what else he lies about. He is clearly willing to lie in service of the anti-porn agenda, how do we know he does not lie in service of other agendas? We do not, for, unlike Chomsky, we are not experts on international politics. For all we know, he may spout quite a lot of crap when it comes to those areas as well! In fact, we should probably assume that he does lie when it comes to other matters. Why would he think it okay to lie for the anti-porn cause but not for the Palestinian cause? Surely the latter is much more important! And if you can lie for little cause “X”, you can certainly lie for big cause “Y.”

So, yes, I have just lost my respect for Noam Chomsky. From now on I will regard him as yet another dishonest, untrustworthy pundit whose every claim is to be regarded with great suspicion – and not a little disdain.

Video below.