Skip to content

The Coming Darkness

The Coming Darkness published on 2 Comments on The Coming Darkness

Sorry to be a downer, kids, but we are all seriously fucked. This may or may not be news to you, but I just wanted to get it out there. That way, if I turn out to be wrong and the future proves instead to be some socialist utopia brimming over with cotton candy and cute puppies, my enemies can look back and point out what a tool I was. Unfortunately, such a happy event is not something I have to fear.

Over the last few months it has become increasingly obvious to me that those who see the future as an Orwellian nightmare are being unduly optimistic. The future is not a boot stamping on a human face forever, it is much worse, something that in Orwell’s day could not even be imagined. That’s when you know the future is fucked – when science-fiction dystopias start to pale in comparison to the reality bearing down upon us like an out-of-control freight train.

The world’s workers are a mere two or three decades away from being rendered totally obsolete. The plutocrats have long been wondering what to do about these troublesome bastards, and in the 20th century the treacherous, self-destructive idiot-savants commonly referred to as the intellectual classes started working on the problem. Already we have middle-class workers being replaced by computer programs that allow one person to do what was previously the work of dozens, and working class workers being replaced by everything from ATMs, to self-checkouts, to cashless holes in the wall that dispense the latest hit DVDs without the product having to be sullied by the hands of the proletariat.

In all probability, this mechanization/automation of the workforces means that in twenty years or so most men will be living in a permanent underclass and most women will be working for peanuts. Most of my fellow leftists – as well as most MRAs – don’t seem to be aware of it, but this is why a male dominated power structure has no problem with male workers being sidelined. Why else do neither right wing nor “left wing” governments and institutions do anything about the education gap? Because a female workforce is a compliant workforce and the bastards know it. Replacing male workers with females will allow a smoother transition from a human workforce to a mostly machine workforce. It will make the junking of the human worker a proposition much less likely to result in violent rebellion which, though it has little chance of succeeding, could cost a few plutocrats their lives. And it is when this transition is fully completed that the darkness will really descend.

If you think the rich bastards treat the rest of us badly now that they still need us, wait till most of us have been rendered as useful as the common cockroach. When that time comes – thirty or forty years from now – the majority of women will join the majority of men in the permanent underclass and everyone will be just one big, unhappy family. Contrary to the deluded and ecstatic visions of the feminists, the upper classes will still be male dominated – possibly even more so as surrogacy and adoption become more acceptable. There will, however, be a small middle class composed of workers whose jobs are not so easily performed by machines – the dexterity of surgeons and the dishonest adroitness of lawyers come to mind – and this may be engineered to be female dominated and hence more easily controlled. On the other hand, this class may be so small and so powerless that the bosses won’t care which sex dominates it – even a workforce composed of veritable Spartacuses would be unlikely to carry out a rebellion guaranteed to be a suicidal failure – and once plutocratic support evaporates so will the current over-representation of women amongst those walking out of universities with fancy bits of paper.

And with the reference to Spartacus, we come to the topic of revolution.

As I see it, no real change is possible without revolution or the serious threat of such. By revolution I don’t mean some neo-hippies sitting in a park in New York going “Tut-tut” at the Masters of the Universe, but the old fashioned kind of revolution. The sort of thing that today would be labeled terrorism – you know, a bunch of Americans trying to get rid of Mad King George, French peasants sick of feasting on grass chopping off aristocratic heads, that kind of thing. The problem is that such a revolution is not about to happen, at least not soon enough to have any real chance of success. Right now, there are not enough people aware of just how bad things are to make for any viable attempt at revolution, and the media has so much control over most people’s perceptions that by the time reality becomes such a brutal and dismal wasteland that none but the insane and the intellectually defective will buy the plutocracy’s lies they won’t need propaganda to keep us down –  they will just shoot us dead. By then the western world’s police forces will have been so heavily militarized and the new and expanded definition of terrorism so deeply entrenched that it will be child’s play to simply exterminate any group attempting to rebel. Even if the media bothers to cover such massacres, the public will be too cowed to do anything. Most of them will choose to be silent for fear of getting a knock on the door at 3am, and many others – unwilling to face their own cowardice – will simply convince themselves that the rebels must deserve their fate.

(And no, the Faux Democracy that has a stranglehold on the developed world holds no real promise. The plutocracy not only owns virtually all the politicians but has also taken many of them into the fold.)

Even after the darkness falls, there will be the brave and rebellious few carrying out the occasional attack on the tyrants – a futuristic version of the French resistance, with the crucial difference that the Liberation will never come – but those heroic few will only be able to cause some tiny amount of bother for the plutocrats, they will be too small a force to actually change anything.

What we are left with is a very grim future indeed, one which, as I stated earlier, makes most science fiction dystopias pale into insignificance.

So what are we plummeting headlong into? In my view, the future will be a pit of poverty and squalor that will make America’s ghettos and trailer parks look like Beverly Hills. It will be a world in which 99% of the human race will, at worst, be left to starve in the ruins of once-great cities, and at best be humanely exterminated by the few plutocrats with enough humanity to care about the mercy of a quick death. It will be a world of walled cities surrounded  by automated machine guns and autonomous killing drones ever watchful for any starveling desperate enough to risk certain death for one last chance to rummage through the garbage bins of the rich. It will be a string of state-run, corporate-controlled killing sprees, all part of one last desperate scramble for fast-dwindling resources, instigated by psychopaths for whom too much is never enough. It will be a waking nightmare, a dark fantasy come to screaming life, a new Dark Age dominated not by religion but by technology, a cesspit of human suffering and inequity the likes of which has never before been seen. That, as I see it, is what awaits the bulk of  humanity. I really, really hope I am wrong – but I seriously doubt it.

 

 

Blind Old Man in UK Taser Terror!

Blind Old Man in UK Taser Terror! published on

Colin Farmer made the mistake of going out for a walk while carrying a samurai sword. Oh, wait, it was actually a white cane! But some cop apparently can’t tell the difference, so he zapped the blind 61-year-old with 50,000 volts! Farmer seems to have survived without permanent injury, but at such an age and with a couple of strokes in the background his can be considered a lucky escape…

Continue reading Blind Old Man in UK Taser Terror!

Why and How the Plutocracy is Destroying Patriarchy in the Lower Classes

Why and How the Plutocracy is Destroying Patriarchy in the Lower Classes published on

One of the most persistent and least-questioned feminist lies is that patriarchy and the plutocracy are partners in the oppression of just about everyone and everything on the planet.

The truth of the matter is that patriarchy – here defined as a social system in which fathers have more influence over the family unit’s thoughts and behaviors than mothers do – is a terrible danger to the plutocracy. Once you realize this, it becomes much easier to explain one of the most puzzling aspects of modern society – why a male-dominated society is so clearly and heavily anti-male and anti-father.

For reasons of clarity, here is my basic argument…

Premise One

The plutocrats have the intellect to know what will benefit them

Premise Two

The plutocrats are interested primarily in their own welfare

Premise Three

The plutocrats have the power to mold society to their liking

Conclusion

Providing that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, it is probable that the plutocrats will do what they can to make their lives easier, regardless of the damage inflicted on others.

Given the obviousness of the premises and the cogency of the reasoning, I fail to see how anyone could not agree with the conclusion. Yet somehow, as obvious as the premises are to most leftists, the actual conclusion never seems to occur to most of my fellow travelers. Blinded by ideology, they refuse to see that the plutocracy wants working class and middle class families to retain their patriarchal element about as much as I want to take a swim in a river full of bacon-loving piranhas.

So, having established that the bastards act primarily in their own interests and that they have the power to destroy the patriarchal element in the working and middle classes, how do we know that it is in their interests to do so?

Why it is being done

The plutocracy benefits from the obliteration of the patriarchal element by replacing the authority of the more rebellious parent with the authority of the more compliant parent. For the most part, it is men who rebel, men who fight back, and men who are more likely to teach their kids not to take any crap from the higher-ups. Even in families where neither parent invests much time in explicitly telling their kids these things there will be numerous messages taken on board through simple modeling — “This is how the parent with the most influence does it,” think the kiddies, “so this is how I will do it.” Get rid of dad, and you have removed a significant source of resistance.

How it is being done

The tactics are numerous, but they can be boiled down to three basic strategies.

1 – Portray men as unnecessary parents

This is not a hard thing to do when you control the television, movie and publishing industries, and when you have your willing allies in the feminist movement writing articles and books filled with pseudo-intellectual claptrap giving these biased portrayals “validity.” Fill the screens with male idiots who don’t know which end of the baby the diaper goes on, fill books and women’s magazines with lies about how easy it is for a single woman to raise kids by herself, and pretty soon you have a multitude of women who see fathers as optional accessories and a legion of men who see no point in becoming something as useless and redundant as a dad.

2 – Encourage the break up of families

For servants of the plutocracy who claim to be left wing this is an easy task. In addition to the negative portrayal of fathers, you simply turn out a torrent of movies, television shows, ads, and books portraying husbands as disposable buffoons who can’t even remember the color of their wives’ eyes, much less their birthday. Add to that the making of excuses for women who cheat on or abandon their husbands, and the next time a marriage is experiencing difficulties there is a greater chance that the wife will simply dump her husband.

If you are a servant of the plutocracy who claims to be right wing you have to be rather cautious about this. As many of your followers have an honest desire to keep the family unit intact you can’t be too proactive. You must limit most of your contribution to simply shutting up when the so-called left wing media portrays husbands as disposable buffoons, and sitting on your hands when your constituents ask you to make divorce harder and less profitable for both wives and their lawyers. In the end, the plutocracy gets its way and the illusion that you really do believe in “family values” is preserved.

3 – Make it harder for men to remain active parents once the marriage ends

Part of this job has already been done by painting fathers as inadequate parents. Add to this a media that portrays child abuse as a male dominated crime despite the statistics showing that it is the opposite which is true, the continuing perception that children “naturally” belong with the mother, family law judges who have spent the last thirty years listening to feminist propaganda, and you have a ready-made excuse to almost automatically hand custody of the kids over to the parent less likely to raise them to not take so much of your shit.

It’s that simple, and it’s what is happening around the developed world even as you read this.

I should point out that this destruction of patriarchy at the family level does not necessarily lead to an actual matriarchy at the community level. Just because moms run the community’s families doesn’t mean they run the community itself – ask a black man from a ghetto if you don’t believe me – but it does mean that you will have a weaker, more compliant bunch of peasants to push around. And to the psychopaths who run the world, that is all that matters.

“No kippers left, guv’nor…”

“No kippers left, guv’nor…” published on

The Sex Pistols were wrong – there is a future for England, it’s just a future without food.

So, apparently kids in parts of Old Blighty are going hungry. Even kids whose parents work are in trouble solely because the stupid little bastards were born to serfs who — despite spending 40+ hours in the field — don’t make enough money to support a family.

This sad but predictable situation has forced Save the Children to redirect some of its resources from feeding hungry Africans to feeding hungry British – the first time it has done so in its almost one hundred year history. While reasonable people are applauding this measure, others beg to differ and suggest instead some less orthodox solutions.

One such naysayer is Conservative MP Alistair Hurlington – Highbottom, known to his friends as Jumbo, who yesterday held a press conference in which he made his views known. As someone who finds himself in the possession of both a flying convertible – long story – and a fake but very convincing UK Press Card, I made sure I was there to take notes…

After squeezing his way into the conference room, waddling his way to the podium, and letting out a loud burp, Hurlington – Highbottom began…

“I know that we are all concerned about the plight of hungry children everywhere and naturally we want to do what we can to help. The answer, however, is not yet another handout. Why should the British public dole out money to some layabout and his litter just because he and the missus can’t be bothered to put down the cigarettes and beer and take up a second or third job? What utter extravagance! To waste good money on feeding children when there is a much easier and much more economic way to solve the problem.”

After pausing briefly to mop the sweat from his brow and brush the donut crumbs from his lapel, Hurlington – Highbottom continued…

“The fact is that everyone knows that hungry children are not Britain’s only problem. There are also large populations of feral pigeons all over the country, pooping on everyone and everything. I suggest that we solve two problems with one measure by passing legislation that will allow the poor to kill, cook, and eat these feral animals. I will even go so far as to say that the government should make available to the poor free cricket bats — though I think it only fair that the poor themselves provide the nails with which the bats need to be studded in order to be fully effective. Now, I know what you’re thinking. How the bloody hell do you kill pigeons with cricket bats?!?? The bloody things fly, don’t they ?!?! Well, what you do is make your way down to the town square and throw some gravel on the ground. The pigeons come down to check it out, and before the bastards can realize they’ve been duped, you thump them with the bat! Instantly you have a meal guaranteed to satisfy any child!”

At this point I felt compelled to interject…

“Er… what happens when the pigeons run out?”

“What in heaven’s name do you think feral foxes are for? Fine eating, I’m told! And you can make yourself a nice pair of boots too, thereby taking even more stress off the family budget! And let’s not forget the stray cats and dogs! These creatures are all great sources of high quality protein and other essential nutrients. And then there’s the Battersea Dogs Home and other animal shelters – those places are just full of animals looking for good homes, and they aren’t all going to find one, are they? Once those sources have been exhausted maybe we will be justified in giving these people money, but not till then. Why, I myself will pledge 50 p and a box of half-eaten donuts right here and now!”

At this point the press conference came to a sudden and unexpected end as a concrete-filled rubber chicken spun through the air and struck the MP on the head. His noggin not being as well padded as the rest of his frame, Hurlington – Highbottom went down like a case of sherry at a meeting of the House of Lords.

As the paramedics tended to what I fervently hope is a very serious concussion, I decided it was time to make a discreet exit. As I left the building I realized that an England full of starving children may not be the best place for a Pigman. I covered my head with my coat and sprinted for the parking lot.

Infertile Dwarves – Coming Soon To A Crib Near You

Infertile Dwarves – Coming Soon To A Crib Near You published on

Monsanto strikes again. After spending two years stuffing hamsters full of Monsanto GM soy, Russian eggheads have found that after a couple of generations the furry little bastards turn into runts who can’t breed! And that’s if they don’t die in infancy…

Another charming result of feeding the critters crap which amounts to little more than toxic waste is that instead of just being furry on the outside these hamsters get furry on the inside – of their mouths. Not ordinary fur either, but sharp, spiky, mucus-covered fur! And here is what is really scary – this is the same soy that gets put into processed foods in the USA! Christ, the corporate scum are slowly turning the real world into a bad science-fiction movie…

 

More here