Skip to content

Hate Crime In England

Hate Crime In England published on

From the land of hate-mongering Harriet Harman, comes a story of clear and undeniable misandry.

Seems some dykish looking women — probably dykes — thought a bloke had whistled at them, so they beat him up! Doesn’t seem like a good excuse for assault to me, but apparently it did to Vanessa Delaney,Claire Edwards and Sally Pawson, as well as to the idiot judge, who gave them three month suspended sentences!

What makes this a hate crime? The fact that while the psycho Otep wannabes were beating him up they were shouting anti-male abuse such as “All men are idiots!”. Imagine a bunch of guys beating up a woman while shouting misogynist crap and getting anything other than jail time! Unlikely, if not actually impossible.

Apart from serving as yet another example of how anti-male the West has become, this should also serve as a lesson – if  three women, especially if they look like these three do, come at you, flatten the bitches. The days of  angry women squealing “Oh, you awful man!” then walking away in a huff are over. The gyno-beast is out of its cage and it’s at least as vile as its male equivalent.

More here

Evil Clown Alert!

Evil Clown Alert! published on

In the U.K, children’s entertainers such as clowns and magicians will soon be required to enter their names into a database, just in case they turn out to be child molesters.

These guys already have to undergo checks by the Criminal Records Bureau, checks that can cost as much as ÂŁ60, and now under another initiative which goes into effect in October, they will have to fork out another ÂŁ64 to add their names to a second database administered by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA).

It is expected that within five years there will be over 11 million names on this database, supposedly to protect kiddies from evil clowns, but i see it as nothing more than another  way to stigmatize men by portraying all men who work with children as potential predators – after all is there a similar scheme for female-dominated areas like child care and nursing? Let’s guess…

Found it at IFeminists, the only feminists that aren’t evil clowns.

Stephany Alexander Sucks

Stephany Alexander Sucks published on

Who the hell is Stephany Alexander, i hear you ask?  She’s the cowpat of a woman who set up “Womansavers.com”, previously known by the far more descriptive name of “Manhaters.com.”

Amongst the dubious services offered by this site is the opportunity for women to accuse any man they take a dislike to of being abusive or unfaithful, no evidence or other legal niceties needed.The women are allowed to use the man’s real name and his real photo, and so far 40,000 men have been put into this database. And it is always a man -the rules clearly specify that one can not post accusations about women. This is no obscure little feminist website, Womansavers gets 90 thousand visits per month, and the guys at the top of the list have had the accusations against them viewed hundreds of thousands of times- that’s a lot of vilification for something completely unproven.

Because you need to be logged in to Womansavers to see these pages i have provided screen captures rather than the usual links, and of course i have reduced the men’s names to initials…

Now, just how easy is it to get a man’s name onto their database? This easy…

The entire thing can be done anonymously –  once a week all the IP addresses attached to posts are deleted so by the time this post is published at the end of July, my poster’s IP address will be gone and no matter how serious the allegations,  the poster can’t be tracked down.  An account was opened using a false female name and an email set up for this purpose alone, then a post containing  an accusation about a non-existent man by the name of  ”Fred Megatronowiz” was created, a photo of Jean Claude Van Damme was uploaded, and  poor Fred was described as a liar and a cheat as well as a “giant robot trying to take over the universe” ! But hey, it could have been YOUR name, YOUR photo, and the entry could have accused you of being a rapist and child molester, and thousands of women would have access to that accusation! And it costs no money to do this – that’s how easy it is to wreck a man’s good name these days.

Here is a screen capture of the resulting post…

Interestingly, even though vilifying poor old Fred is free, un-vilifying him would cost 25 dollars (to remove the post) or 10 dollars (to edit the post) and only the person who posted the accusation – or the “survey” as they like to call it – can remove or edit it, not Fred himself.

Why the fee? Could it be that this woman is laying aside her sisterly motives in order to fleece women who post statements they later wish to remove? So much for sisterhood. And yes, she says it goes to charity but the problem is she has her own charity for abused women, children and animals (!) so who knows how much of this money is finding its way into her pockets?

Think you can sue her? Alas no. Apparently the only people liable for false statements are the ones making the accusations and as good old Stephany sees to it that the IP addresses are deleted after a week, good luck in finding that bitch who branded you a sheep-humping freak!

Little Ms Manhater is really raking in the cash by vilifying men – she also has a book in which she, amongst other things, tells you how to get a free background check on a man before you date him. Not after he gives you reason to think he’s up to something shady, mind you, but just because he’s a man and therefore suspect. She also seems to have affiliations with a service that keeps track of you during a date so that if you don’t get back by a certain time it is assumed you are dining with Ted Bundy and the National Guard is called out.

More about this vile woman here.

The Ultimate Female Sentencing Discount – Serial Killer Hellen Moore

The Ultimate Female Sentencing Discount – Serial Killer Hellen Moore published on

I know that we have seen some truly  egregious examples of the female sentencing discount recently, but the case i am about to detail is by far, bar none, the worst case of the female sentencing discount i have ever come across – the case  of Australian serial killer Helen Patricia Moore.

In May of 1979, in the Western Suburbs of Sydney, 17 year old Helen Patricia Moore suffocated Suzanne McIntosh, a 16 month old cousin whom she was babysitting – the child’s death was at the time put down to cot death.

In January of 1980 Moore attempted to suffocate yet another of her babysitting charges, 12 month old Nicholas Vaughan. Having thought her latest attempt at murder a success, Helen Moore went back to calmly watching TV. A while later the baby boy started crying, she called the ambulance and the boy made a full recovery.

Despite this latest suspicious incident, the babysitting jobs kept coming and on February 1st 1980 Helen suffocated two year old Aaron Crocker with a pillow, again failing to finish the job properly. Little Aaron survived but was left blind and crippled and died several years later as a result of Moore’s attack.

A few weeks later on February 24th 1980, two year old Rachel Hay died while in the care of Helen Moore.

In march of 1980, Helen’s  seven year old brother Peter was found dead at the bottom of the stairs in the family home, only then did Helen’s mother Jesse realize something was up. She called the police and the whole story came out, with Helen quickly confessing first to the murder of Peter then to the other crimes.

Now here’s the thing, when Helen Moore was sentenced in 1980 the judge gave her life, but a dozen years later she sought a sentence review and that original  sentence was reduced to 13 years and nine months, and in 1993 Helen Moore was  given parole! Think about it, this is a serial killer who preyed on children and they let her out of jail after just 13 years. Could someone please find me a case wherein a male serial killer, especially one who preys on small children, is allowed to go free after only thirteen years in jail, even if he was 17 at the time of the murders? I seriously doubt that such a case can be found, as i am something of a true crime fan and i’ve never even heard of such a thing.

And just to underline how pro-woman and disregarding of children’s safety our western patriarchies are, a year or two into her parole she got pregnant, and even though they took the baby away from her for a very brief period, it was soon handed back to her, despite the fact that she was a killer of small children. Now if that doesn’t show the precedence that women’s rights take over the safety of children, nothing does. Helen Moore’s parole period ran out in 2005, and even though i haven’t been able to confirm it, it is highly likely that she was set free, and that right now, out there in Australia somewhere, a serial killer is living free and easy, and why? Because our society places such a high value on women and such a low value on men and children, that’s why.

By the way, don’t bother googling Helen Moore’s name – all i could find was an article about how they briefly took the daughter away from her when she was born, all else i got from a book called “Australia’s Serial Killers” by an Australian crime writer called Paul B. Kidd. The book was published in 2001, hence my not being able to confirm that she did make it through the parole period.

Scumbag Magan Marie Muir…

Scumbag Magan Marie Muir… published on

… got off the hook because she’s a female scumbag.  Muir was convicted of taking two year old Damon Reddom Stone’s hands and shoving them into boiling water, causing agonizing third and fourth degree burns, yet when sentenced by Justice Helen MacLeod-Beliveau this worthless piece of garbage was given house arrest. That’s all, just lock her up in her nice comfortable home for eighteen months. Not only that, but she was also granted permission to move in with her family for the last few months of her house arrest – so she doesn’t even get to be a lonely scumbag, she gets the company of mom and dad…

Does anyone with a brain think this kind of subhuman filth would get such lenient treatment if she were a male? No, i dont think so, neither do i think that  the Judge would be excusing her leniency by saying this woman is not a danger to the public and that custodial sentences don’t serve as a deterrent. But hey, as we all know, in Western societies nobody matters more than women – not even children. And of course, you know what i think would be an appropriate punishment for this piece of shit? Let’s just say it involves a pot of boiling water…

Damon’s mother Tina has started a Facebook group which can be joined at…

Where is the Justice?

Tina has also started a petition which can be signed here. They need just a couple of hundred more signatures to reach their goal of 3000 and as this is an opportunity for people to do more than just read about this injustice, i urge my readers to sign the petition. Apparently your country of residence doesn’t matter, so you don’t need to be in Canada to take action on this one.

Original article  here. This is not the article other sites have linked to, it is a more up to date one, which also gives the correct date of the incident – 2007 not 1997- and it also has some good news, namely that the little boy will retain normal use of his hands.

The article in which the Judge makes her excuses is here.