…and she’s coming after your Trump-supporting ass. Now, in less violent times this would be just hyperbole, metaphor, and so on. But at a time when people are literally being murdered in the streets for supporting Trump, i think it safe to say this can be taken as an incitement to violence. And look at how many likes it got before she deleted it — more than 20 thousand. That’s today’s so-called liberals for you — rage and violence in defeat and rage and violence in victory. And after she deleted it she didn’t mention it again, much less apologize for it, she just posted stuff about how wonderful love is! It’s enough to make you throw up.
You know those times when you eat something that’s gone off and the only solution to your woes is to make yourself puke, but the fingers down the throat just aren’t working? I give you the answer to your problems…
Bloody ‘ell! Yes, it’s Lizzo, that icon of everything that is healthy and wholesome. And this came from some Daily Mail article in which she was described as “curvaceous”! No – curvaceous means you have curves, what this woman has are lumps! If anything, she’s lump-aceous!
Now, if you want to be fat enough to get stuck in a freight elevator, that’s your business. But when you are rich and famous and therefore influential, you should not be acting as if looking like a beached whale that’s been left out in the sun too long is a good thing. After all, unlike the rich, girls stupid enough to follow this Lizzo girl into the realm of morbid obesity can’t afford to pay someone to wipe their asses! Think about it, this woman literally cannot wipe her own ass, and she’s being held up — with great difficulty, admittedly — as some sort of role model! It’s madness, that’s what it is.
And then there are the coming medical bills. Fine for Lizzo, she can get a million dollars worth of surgery at the first sign of high blood pressure, but the poor girls can’t! They’ll get diabetes, and heart attacks, and strokes! And how you gonna look sexy when both your feet are missing and half your face is down to your knees? You ain’t. Shame on Lizzo, and shame on the Daily Mail for promoting this crap. They’ll be promoting heroin addiction, next.
Like pretty much everyone online i was disgusted by Netflix’s pedo propaganda movie “Cuties.” But unlike many, i gave them a chance to set things right. I waited a whole month to see if they had the decency to remove the filthy thing or at least heavily censor it. They didn’t, not even after a Texas grand jury indicted them over the film.
This makes it pretty clear that someone at the top of the company does have a pedo agenda. After all, what else does Netflix have to gain from doubling down like this? They’ve lost tens of millions of dollars from cancelled subscriptions, they’ve lost credibility and good will, and they haven’t even gained anything politically as the movie was attacked by virtually everyone across the political spectrum. So what’s in it for them? What is the great positive that outweighs all these negatives? I can think of only one — they get to normalize the sexualization of children, and in time that will lead to the re-acceptance of paedophilia. That’s the only payoff i can think of. And it’s important to remember that this IS the RE-acceptance of paedophilia. A lot of people think such a thing could never happen but it already has in the past. Throughout much of history people didn’t really give a shit about children being molested, and that’s what Netflix and other forces are trying to take us back to. Give them time. If things like this continue to go unpunished, in twenty years pedos will be getting a slap on the wrist – and that’s if it’s still illegal. So, that’s Netflix over for me. If they come to their minds and replace the pedos heading their company and pull the movie i might re-join, but i doubt it. The stain remains. And so does the bad smell.
Now that the Netflix atrocity “Cuties” has splashed onto the internet like a turd hitting the toilet water, i feel like it’s my responsibility as a rational adult to say that this is wrong, wrong, wrong — so wrong it’s possibly the wrongest thing ever.
I wasn’t planning on writing about this, but i find myself surprisingly disturbed by it – and i watched the McNutt suicide video with all the emotion of a coroner carrying out an autopsy. But this, this is repulsive on a completely different level that i, frankly, can’t explain. Maybe it’s just some sort of innate revulsion at people too young to breed being portrayed as sex objects. Not many cats trying to hump kittens, you know. It just ain’t part of the natural order.
I haven’t seen the entire thing, nor do i plan to, but i did watch the clip in which the little girls do an erotic dance routine that is beyond the pale for a bunch of 11 and 12 year olds. Barely-there outfits, floor-humping, crotch shots, and for a few seconds we actually see the girls down on the floor pretending to get…er…bleeped from behind!
Hey, look, it’s a still from Roman Polanski’s favorite new movie!
Either that or humping the floor, but it looks more like the former to me. At least that’s what’s happening when i see women doing that in porn movies. Yes… i watch porn starring women instead of children, but i guess i’m just not as hip as the guys at Netflix. Let me be blunt — there is absolutely no reason to make this filthy movie other than to normalize the sexualization of children and therefore of pedophilia.
Excuses will be made about how the movie is actually against the very thing it is doing, but that’s bullshit. Any points the movie does make against the sexualization of children could have been made, well, WITHOUT SEXUALIZING CHILDREN! Taking the scene mentioned above, the point could have been made just as well with some very mild twerking being shown on-screen, then reaction shots of the horrified on-screen audience as the girls move on to more provocative crap that is not shown to the OFF-screen audience. It’s called a cutaway, and is common even in transgressive genres like horror. If i know that, so does the asshole who directed the thing.
And that leaves me with only one conclusion – the movie’s main purpose is to normalize the sexualization of children while pretending to condemn it. It’s not an accident, it’s a deliberate tactic. This is part of a vile movement to make child molestation acceptable, like those turds trying to re-brand pedos as MAPS — minor-attracted persons — in order to make them seem harmless. The people behind this movie know that the sexualized depiction of children makes such a thing less shocking and, in time, less unacceptable. They know that this will lead to people thinking less unfavourably of pedophiles, and that will lead to less convictions, and shorter sentences and, in time, a full normalization of child sexual abuse. That is almost certainly the goal, of that i have no doubt. I don’t say it often, but this movie needs to be banned — or at the very least heavily censored.
On the positive side, the revulsion has been almost universal. The liberal elites are trying to portray it as some sort of conservative backlash, but that’s just more pedos making excuses. Look at the ratio the trailer has on YouTube. There is NO WAY you get these kind of numbers without a huge number of ordinary liberals throwing up…
