Skip to content

Gloria Steinem Thinks Men Who Don’t Back Hillary Are Big Babies

Gloria Steinem Thinks Men Who Don’t Back Hillary Are Big Babies published on

 

Steinem, the least intellectually capable of all famous feminist leaders, has declared that men who don’t support her man-hating, Neo-con, pseudo-liberal buddy Hillary Clinton are, basically, children. In an interview with some other cackling harpy, Steinem offers this bit of so-called wisdom…
“… guys in the media, who are perfectly serious people, saying things like, about Hillary Clinton, I cross my legs whenever I see her, she reminds me of my first wife standing outside alimony court. Looking at a powerful woman made them feel they had been regressed to childhood, because the last time they saw a really powerful woman, they were eight. So they behaved like eight.”

In other words, this is just a roundabout way of saying that if you don’t support Hillary Clinton, you are just another crybaby man-child. Doesn’t take a genius to see through that. But beyond the lame shaming tactic, what really caught my attention is that when men say HC reminds them of their ex-wife, Steinem, in all her intellectual glory, decides this means that HC reminds them of their mothers! Apparently, in Steinem’s world, mother and wife are the same thing. Which makes me very, very glad that she never had any children – especially male ones…

For a brief moment, when I read the headline in the linked article, I thought she was going to say that female authority is to a great extent based on some men’s fear of female authority figures who, on some level, remind them of abusive mothers. But that would have been too honest – and too intelligent – an observation to expect from the feminist movement’s lightest lightweight.

She does get one thing right – a female presidency would, indeed, be hell! For men, for the poor, and almost certainly for the Arab world.

Gloria Steinem being retarded here.

The Islamic Invasion and Useful Left Wing Idiocy

The Islamic Invasion and Useful Left Wing Idiocy published on

Let me make it clear – there is an Islamic invasion going on. There are huge numbers of Muslims flooding into liberal, European states and if the situation continues Europe will, within a century, become a bunch of Islamic states.

This cannot be doubted by anyone who is actually watching what’s going on, and should be especially clear to those in the New World. After all, how did the whites take over the US, Canada, and Australia? Through migration. Sure, there were some bloody clashes, and in some places violence was indeed the primary means of conquest. But in many other cases it was mostly a matter of peaceful Europeans moving in next to peaceful natives. The problem is, the Europeans simply kept moving in. And moving in. And moving in. And before they knew it, the native tribes were a minority in their own land. This is what is now happening to Europe, and apart from a few right wingers, nobody seems to care.

This right wing opposition, combined with the average left wing idiot’s support, leads many to see the Islamic invasion as some sort of liberal/left wing plot. This, alas, serves only to show that the Left isn’t the only side of the political dog that is riddled with fleas. The fact is that there is no actual liberal/left wing goal to be attained by flooding the liberal west with illiberal foreigners! You might as well claim that the British invasion of Australia was the doing of the Aboriginals, or that it was the Native Americans who invited the Pilgrims to come on over! No, there is nothing to be gained by Donald Trump asking hordes of Mexicans to move to New York so that they can all vote against him and his fellow Republicans!

So, who does gain from the Islamic invasion? Well, let’s see. Who is it that is sick and tired of all this lefty crap about fairness, and justice, and treating the poor with dignity? It’s not the few genuine leftists still out there, I can tell you! It’s the far right and the plutocrats – but especially the plutocrats. The plutocrats are the people who stand to gain by playing a long term strategy that will slowly turn the Liberal West into a Conservative West. True, their grandchildren may end up having to pay lip service to Islam, but so what? In places like Amerika the plutocrats pay lip service to Christianity in order to retain power, so pretending to be religious is nothing new to the scum who own the world. Hell, you can bet your ass that in the Arab world there are already plenty of plutocrats condemning homosexuality and alcohol in public and then getting drunk and fucking underage boys in private!

The idea that the invasion is a plutocratic project is supported not only by asking who benefits, but also by asking who has the power to stop it, yet does nothing. And, yes, the plutocrats are the ones who have the power to stop the Islamic invasion, for they are the ones who own most of the media and most of the politicians. Hell, these are the people who convinced most of the world that the slaughter in Iraq would be justified because Saddam had some trucks! If they wanted to, they could have virtually everyone in Europe rejecting the Islamic invasion within a few weeks. And yet they don’t. Why? Because this is how they want things to be.

How, then, does one explain the Left wing support for this plutocratic ploy? Sheer stupidity, that’s how. In the same way that many right wing Amerikans have been convinced that neo-liberalism is good for the poor, so too have many left wingers in Europe, Amerika, and Australia been convinced that the Islamic invasion is good for liberalism! It’s a bit of insanity that logical minds struggle to understand, but that does seem to be how it is. The idea that virtually every leftist is a knowing servant of the plutocracy is ludicrous, so irrationality seems the most likely culprit. Keep in mind, these are people who have swallowed Political Correctness hook, line, and sinker. These are the people who look at Bruce Jenner and see a woman! Much in the same way that Christian fundamentalism has made many conservatives too irrational to know shit from chocolate, so has PC made many liberals too irrational to know a cunt from a cock! But how has such an insane situation come to be? I think that it is as simple as giving the people the wrong leaders and then watching the lemmings all go off the cliff. A few individuals in positions of influence ( either put there by the plutocrats or who simply share the plutocrats’ values ) start spouting a lot of sophistry and rhetoric, and those lower down on the ladder eat it up with their Chinese-made Wal-Mart spoons. In other words, the plutocrats who own things like Fox News have convinced the average right wing idiot that Amerikan Imperialism will restore Amerika to her former glory, while the plutocrats who own CNN and MSNBC have convinced the average left wing idiot that multiculturalism and a flood of conservative foreigners are what will make Amerika great once again. Either way, the bastards are the ones telling the idiots what to do, what to say, what to think, and so they are the ones who get their way.

But then there’s the right wing’s opposition to the invasion. How is that to be explained? The thing to note here is that the right wing leadership seems split on the matter, and that the most vocal opposition comes from ordinary right wingers and a few populists like Donald Trump. And even Trump is being attacked by fellow right wing leaders in the US for opposing the invasion, while in Europe you have “socially conservative” scum like Angela Merkel saying, “Come on in!” to 800 thousand Muslims who could just as easily have hopped across to Iraq! And even the split amongst the conservative leaders is, most likely, due to the near-unanimous opposition to Muslim immigration amongst the rank and file. Were it not for the average right winger on the street, most right wing leaders would shut up and let the plutocrats have their way and welcome their fellow conservatives with open arms. As for the average right winger’s opposition, i am betting that it comes down to little more than xenophobia and a fear of terrorism — after all, it is highly unlikely that the average right winger knows that he is fighting on behalf of liberalism!

This then, is how I see the Islamic invasion of the West, as a plutocratic project being carried out by masses of leftist ground troops who can’t tell their bellybuttons from their assholes, on the behest of a handful of “leftist” leaders who know exactly what they are doing – and exactly how stupid their followers are.

Tayla Aubrey-Lee Griffiths is an utter little cunt!

Tayla Aubrey-Lee Griffiths is an utter little cunt! published on

Not as big a cunt as Clementine Ford, but pretty close – and she’s still a kid! Imagine what she’ll be like when she’s as old and bitter as Ford!

A fine example of what women are turning into, that’s what Australian teenager Tayla Aubrey-Lee Griffiths is. In the video below, an apparently mentally disabled kid is sitting there minding his own business, thinking of, well, nothing probably, when Tayla Aubrey-Lee Griffiths walks up and hits him in the face hard enough to draw blood. The video, as videos will these days, made its way onto the internet and the little shit ended up getting more Facebook attention than she would like in what, for once, is a well-justified shit-storm of internet outrage…

Still, at least she’s all contrite and shit, right? Not exactly. At first she made up excuses for her violence against someone who looks about as threatening as the average hamster, and then she told us all to go fuck ourselves…

tayla calls us cunts

 

tayla admits she was wrong but so what

And, just five hours ago, she was still being a right charmer…

tayla aubrey lee griffiths is shit

As of the writing of this paragraph, her Facebook page is gone! It actually disappeared right after I did the above screengrab. What a brave little cunt she is! Thumping retarded kids, bragging about it, then running and hiding when the internet gets its torches and pitchforks out. Typical. Bloody. Bully. Let’s just hope the little bitch never gets to breed – Child Services has enough to deal with already.

James Deen Is Starting To Look Pretty Bad

James Deen Is Starting To Look Pretty Bad published on

To feminists and other Witchfinders he looked bad as soon as Stoya accused him of raping her. But decent, rational, people like to have a bit more to go on before piling up the wood and lighting the fire.

Thing is, though, that now there is more to go on. None of it is evidence, but I like to do things based on probability, and the probability that all these women are lying is fairly small. It’s not a Cosby thing – not yet – where there are so many accusers that it is virtually impossible that they are all lying, but it’s enough to make Deen look very suspect.

Since Stoya’s rather dubious accusations (you want cred when accusing a black man of raping you, don’t point out that you are in the Klan) other people have come forward with stories of various types of sexual abuse suffered at the hands of “Porn’s Tom Cruise.” The latest seems to be one Lily LaBeau, whose story is confirmed by the guy who directed the scene during which Deen slapped her so hard she couldn’t move her jaw for several minutes. ( He apparently did this while his foot was jammed in her mouth, so it seems James has a habit of confusing mouths with footwear. Bizarre thing, the BDSM industry. What the hell ever happened to fucking for the sake of fucking?)

But anyway, the grossness of some modern porn aside, this is a bad development for James Deen, who looks sleazier and sleazier by the day. Now, I am no puritan, so I don’t think fucking in front of a camera makes him sleazy. What makes him sleazy is his other behaviors. At the very least, Deen seems to be an S&M freak with little respect for his partners, at worst he is a straight out rapist. Either way, it makes one wish the worst we could say of Deen is that he bounces up and down on couches and takes a certain sci-fi writer too seriously…

LaBeau lays the dirt about lying with dirt here

And here’s a photo of Lily LaBeau for purely gratuitous purposes. It includes her jaw, but no foot…

lily labeau hustler