Skip to content

Alternet’s anti-White bias on display

Alternet’s anti-White bias on display published on

The black Brooklyn shooter was on Alternet’s front page for a couple of days at the most. Some White guy who merely plotted a terror attack in Germany has been on their front page for at least four days now. Unless Alternet truly believe that a FAILED plot in Germany is more pertinent to their mostly American readership than a SUCCESSFUL terrorist attack in Brooklyn, this is a clear example of the way the SJW media likes to cover up black terrorism while shouting about White terrorism from the rooftops. And there have been a few new stories published there in the last few days so one has to wonder why THEY haven’t been moved into the main spot. This, folks, is how the Establishment — which includes the SJW media — rig things to make it look like White people are a problem that needs to be dealt with.

How will Alternet react to anti-White racism?

How will Alternet react to anti-White racism? published on

Turns out there’s an SJW version of “black people are monkeys,” and that is “white people are kinda neanderthals.” Both are objectionable, and we both know what would happen if someone in Alternet’s comment section posted the first. What will happen in this case? I suspect nothing. I reported it, but i will be very surprised if Alternet gives a shit. After all, these are the people who pushed the anti-White subway shooter off their pages just a day after he carried out his terrorist act.

Update : still there 24 hours later. Of course it is. Compare black people to monkeys and it’s bad. Compare White people to cavemen and it’s cool. This is what “liberals” are now.

Update 2 : two days later it’s still there. Probably safe to say this means the mods have looked and gone “meh.” That’s SJWs for ya.

Still there FIVE days later. Racism is cool at Alternet, but only if it’s the anti-White kind.

“White outrage about Will Smith’s slap is rooted in anti-Blackness”

“White outrage about Will Smith’s slap is rooted in anti-Blackness” published on

Yes, you heard that right. Some clown at The Guardian is lying about Whitey — in other words, it’s yet another day ending with day.

Our race-baiting friend, sticking closely to The Gaga’s agenda of using identity politics to keep the peasants fighting amongst themselves, proceeds to claim that…

“The Hollywood director Judd Apatow declared in a deleted tweet that Smith “could have killed” Rock (seriously?), calling it “pure out of control rage and violence”…The radio host Howard Stern compared Smith to Donald Trump, while white women on Twitter somehow decided that Smith’s actions meant he must be beating his wife. It would seem that there’s a layer of hyper-violence that’s being projected on to Smith simply because he is a Black man who was defending his Black wife.”

Note that last sentence. NOBODY with any brain cells believes that the reaction would have been different had it been an all White affair — ESPECIALLY the Donald Trump comparison. And since the writer can put pen to paper one has to assume that he has at least half a dozen of the fucking things left.

He also claims that worse has happened at the Oscars and then goes on to LIE about the infamous John Wayne incident back in the ‘70s.

“Anyone who has been following these shows can see that Smith is being held up to much stricter standards than white men who have behaved just as badly or even worse in those settings. In 1973, John Wayne had to be restrained by six security guards when he tried to rush the stage and attack the Native American actor and activist Sacheen Littlefeather. Littlefeather was on stage to accept the best actor award on behalf of Marlon Brando, who was boycotting the awards in protest at Hollywood’s depictions of Native Americans.”

Note that he claims that John Wayne had to be stopped from ATTACKING Littlefeather even though the woman herself, in the ARTICLE HE LINKS TO says Wayne was just trying to drag her off the stage! Again, there is NO WAY anyone really believes trying to drag someone off the stage is even as bad, much less worse, than thumping them.

It is AMAZING how blatantly the Guardian lies. They don’t even try to be clever about it, they jus straight out LIE. Makes me want to throw up all over my monitor.

Rant over.

Things I Learnt From Will Smith’s Attack On Chris Rock

Things I Learnt From Will Smith’s Attack On Chris Rock published on

— Will Smith does not care about the image of black men. If his behaviour is used
to make them all look like thugs it don’t matter to him — he’s rich, bitch!

— White racists will use any excuse to post a picture of two monkeys fighting.

— Will Smith is little more than his wife’s attack dog — at the after party she was
seen patting him on the head and going “Good boy. Gooood boy.”

— Will Smith is a megalomaniac who thinks he is a river to a desert full
of black people dying of thirst.

— Black America’s violence problem stems to a great extent from the
fact that they think black men hitting black men is perfectly okay, at
least if the reaction from blacks like Ayanna Pressley (and many others)
is anything to go by.

— The scum who populate the movie industry like to applaud thugs
who have just committed assault. Which is kinda okay as while
they are doing that they are too busy to rape starlets or molest little boys.

— You can fuck Will Smith’s wife, but you can’t mention she’s bald.