Skip to content

Why I Cancelled Netflix

Why I Cancelled Netflix published on

Like pretty much everyone online i was disgusted by Netflix’s pedo propaganda movie “Cuties.” But unlike many, i gave them a chance to set things right. I waited a whole month to see if they had the decency to remove the filthy thing or at least heavily censor it. They didn’t, not even after a Texas grand jury indicted them over the film.

This makes it pretty clear that someone at the top of the company does have a pedo agenda. After all, what else does Netflix have to gain from doubling down like this? They’ve lost tens of millions of dollars from cancelled subscriptions, they’ve lost credibility and good will, and they haven’t even gained anything politically as the movie was attacked by virtually everyone across the political spectrum. So what’s in it for them? What is the great positive that outweighs all these negatives? I can think of only one — they get to normalize the sexualization of children, and in time that will lead to the re-acceptance of paedophilia. That’s the only payoff i can think of. And it’s important to remember that this IS the RE-acceptance of paedophilia. A lot of people think such a thing could never happen but it already has in the past. Throughout much of history people didn’t really give a shit about children being molested, and that’s what Netflix and other forces are trying to take us back to. Give them time. If things like this continue to go unpunished, in twenty years pedos will be getting a slap on the wrist – and that’s if it’s still illegal. So, that’s Netflix over for me. If they come to their minds and replace the pedos heading their company and pull the movie i might re-join, but i doubt it. The stain remains. And so does the bad smell.

My post on “Cuties” here.

Cuties Ain’t So Cute

Cuties Ain’t So Cute published on

Now that the Netflix atrocity “Cuties” has splashed onto the internet like a turd hitting the toilet water, i feel like it’s my responsibility as a rational adult to say that this is wrong, wrong, wrong — so wrong it’s possibly the wrongest thing ever.

I wasn’t planning on writing about this, but i find myself surprisingly disturbed by it – and i watched the McNutt suicide video with all the emotion of a coroner carrying out an autopsy. But this, this is repulsive on a completely different level that i, frankly, can’t explain. Maybe it’s just some sort of innate revulsion at people too young to breed being portrayed as sex objects. Not many cats trying to hump kittens, you know. It just ain’t part of the natural order.

I haven’t seen the entire thing, nor do i plan to, but i did watch the clip in which the little girls do an erotic dance routine that is beyond the pale for a bunch of 11 and 12 year olds. Barely-there outfits, floor-humping, crotch shots, and for a few seconds we actually see the girls down on the floor pretending to get…er…bleeped from behind!

 

Hey, look, it’s a still from Roman Polanski’s favorite new movie!

Either that or humping the floor, but it looks more like the former to me. At least that’s what’s happening when i see women doing that in porn movies. Yes… i watch porn starring women instead of children, but i guess i’m just not as hip as the guys at Netflix. Let me be blunt — there is absolutely no reason to make this filthy movie other than to normalize the sexualization of children and therefore of pedophilia.

Excuses will be made about how the movie is actually against the very thing it is doing, but that’s bullshit. Any points the movie does make against the sexualization of children could have been made, well, WITHOUT SEXUALIZING CHILDREN! Taking the scene mentioned above, the point could have been made just as well with some very mild twerking being shown on-screen, then reaction shots of the horrified on-screen audience as the girls move on to more provocative crap that is not shown to the OFF-screen audience. It’s called a cutaway, and is common even in transgressive genres like horror. If i know that, so does the asshole who directed the thing.

And that leaves me with only one conclusion – the movie’s main purpose is to normalize the sexualization of children while pretending to condemn it. It’s not an accident, it’s a deliberate tactic. This is part of a vile movement to make child molestation acceptable, like those turds trying to re-brand pedos as MAPS — minor-attracted persons — in order to make them seem harmless. The people behind this movie know that the sexualized depiction of children makes such a thing less shocking and, in time, less unacceptable. They know that this will lead to people thinking less unfavourably of pedophiles, and that will lead to less convictions, and shorter sentences and, in time, a full normalization of child sexual abuse. That is almost certainly the goal, of that i have no doubt. I don’t say it often, but this movie needs to be banned — or at the very least heavily censored.

On the positive side, the revulsion has been almost universal. The liberal elites are trying to portray it as some sort of conservative backlash, but that’s just more pedos making excuses. Look at the ratio the trailer has on YouTube. There is NO WAY you get these kind of numbers without a huge number of ordinary liberals throwing up…

Feminist Loon Creates Petition to Investigate Sexism Against Female Horses!

Feminist Loon Creates Petition to Investigate Sexism Against Female Horses! published on

Or, as he calls it, hipo-misogyny! There it is, folks — the Seventh Sign of the Apocalypse!

The petition (click here for a good laugh) seems to have been triggered by the article, “Horses saddled with gender bias: mares seen as ‘bossy‘” in which some other feminist loon argues that sexist views of mares as willful, feisty and too likely to eat all the cheesecake, may be leading people to treat them more harshly than they do male horses, who generally are seen as absolute sweethearts.

It’s all falling apart, folks. The ancient Romans had to put up with a lot of crap as their civilization went to hell, but i’m pretty sure complaints about sexism towards horses wasn’t part of it!


Facebook — “Threats of violence are bad. Unless we hate you, that is.”

Facebook — “Threats of violence are bad. Unless we hate you, that is.” published on

Liberals — just when you think they’ve taken it too far, they take it further. Turns out Facebook forbids threats of violence — UNLESS they are against people on their shit list! I swear, when i first saw this i thought it might be a right wing hoax, but nope, it’s the real deal. I went to Facebook and took this screenshot myself.

That’s it, Facebook are now officially evil. Apparently making threats that could lead to the death of the few right wingers still permitted on their platform is perfectly okay. Hell, they don’t even bother to dog-whistle it by making jokes about throwing acid on guys like Sargon, they straight out tell you it’s fine to call for Alex Jones to be shot in the head or blown up!

There’s been a lot of talk about regulating Facebook, but with this one they have crossed the line between being naughty boys that need rules to being hardcore Antifa types who need to be permanently shut down. You know, in Australia we can’t access Bitchute because they host video of the Christchurch massacre. Time to do similar to Facebook. If they think it’s okay to call for people to be killed, it’s time to make sure nobody can access their vile site.