Skip to content

Posts categoriezed as Gender Issues

“Misogynist” Abuse on the Internet

“Misogynist” Abuse on the Internet published on 1 Comment on “Misogynist” Abuse on the Internet


Transcript

Once again The Sisterhood is teaming up with the plutocracy, this time to silence dissent. Using women’s fragile little feelings as the excuse, nutters across the femisphere are calling for what amounts to censorship on sites like twitter and Facebook !

These feminists also claim that the trolls who target the wiminz online are politically driven and trying to “silence women.” This is bullshit for at least two reasons. First, trolls are driven to upset anyone and anything they can, and the troll “threatening” to rape a feminist today is quite likely tomorrow to be at a men’s rights site calling everyone rapists and child molesters, the next day at a hip hop site calling everyone niggers, and the day after that at Stormfront suggesting that its members are a bunch of  latent homosexuals whose wives have to resort to having sex with black men ! Trolls rarely have a political agenda, they are mentally ill little turds desperately seeking to inflate themselves by upsetting others, and they will say whatever they think will give you the shits. For the most part, the average troll is about as politically motivated as Bozo the Clown.

As for “silencing women,” what kind of grown woman is silenced by a pack of dysfunctional 15 year olds living hundreds or even thousands of miles away? A weak one, that’s what kind –  if you can’t take the slings and arrows of outrageous trolling, you should probably leave the internet to those with tougher hides. Take up gardening or something, and try not to get too upset when the earth worms start giving you mean looks.

Then there is the issue of whether or not these trolls are making what can in any meaningful way be understood as a threat. If I threaten to beat you up on the street, that’s a serious matter as street assaults happen all the time, though admittedly it is rare for a concrete-filled rubber chicken to be involved. If I threaten to nuke your house, how likely is that? It’s not as if I am in possession of my own personal nuclear arsenal, though i’m not saying that i wouldn’t like to be…

In the same vein, is it a real threat for a troll to threaten some femofascist dirtbag with rape when he/she is in it for the pleasure of freaking people out? Has any troll actually raped a feminist after threatening to do so? I have yet to hear of it. In fact, I would be willing to bet that, rare as it is, most of the times when an online threat goes live in the real world the victim is a male. But you won’t see some white knighting wanker from Twitter apologizing for that!

Let’s get this straight. This attempt at censorship has nothing to do with keeping anyone safe, primarily it isn’t even about protecting that most precious of creatures, the Western female. What this is mostly about is silencing dissent. Today they want to get rid of trolls saying “I iz gonna rape u slut! LOL!” Tomorrow it will be people who commit “hate speech” by calling someone a bitch or a fag. The day after that, the plutocracy will see its plan come to fruition as anarchists and the like are banned from social media, or even prosecuted by the law, for daring to suggest that it’s time to get rid of The State or force a change of government.

And that, folks, is what this is really about. While I have no doubt that many feminist ground troops, the grunts of the movement, are too stupid to see what they are supporting, I also have no doubt that the leadership, the ones employing this tactic, know exactly what they are doing.

And what they are doing is the same thing they have been doing since the beginning of the Second Wave – stoking female privilege while simultaneously increasing their plutocratic masters’ power over the lower classes.

 

 

 

PZ Myers Accuses Michael Shermer of Rape

PZ Myers Accuses Michael Shermer of Rape published on

Transcript

So P.Z Myers, darling of the feminist factions within the skeptic community, is now accusing bigwig skeptic Michael Shermer of serial rape over on the ironically named Free Thought Blogs, a place which in my experience is not exactly brimming over with either thought or freedom, much less free thought. It is, however, a blog, I’ve got to give them that.

And on what does Myers base this incredibly serious, and possibly defamatory, accusation? Well, pretty much the same thing that religious zealots base their ludicrous views on — someone said it and claims it is true ! Some demented hobo wandering around ancient Judea writes in a book “The Lord sayeth…” and a couple of millennia later millions of religious fools take him at his word. Some unidentified woman tells Feminist High Priest Myers that Mr. X raped her, a second, also unidentified, person claims they were told the same story by the supposed victim and Myers and the other non-thinkers at his blog take their words for it…

Are these people really this stupid? This irrational? This lame-brained? Are their heads really filled with tapioca pudding? Do they really have a hard time trying to figure out the difference between truth and lies, between chocolate and what comes out of most people’s asses, as well as outof P.Z Myers’ mouth?   I doubt it. The probability is that what they really are is a bunch of fifth columnists infiltrating the skeptic and atheist communities in order to turn it to their own evil feminist purposes.

Imagine if you will, a circumstance in which some woman tells your humble host that she was raped by — you guessed it — P.Z Fucking (should that be “raping”?) Myers. How long would it take for this cabal of pseudo intellectuals to switch to a more rigorous standard of evidence? Hell, they would probably do that if their beloved P.Z was accused of stealing someone else’s sandwich from the office fridge !

No, let’s not kid ourselves that these people are morons who don’t know what they are doing, that would be to give them much more  moral credit than they deserve. Let’s instead hope that Myers’ rabid support of feminism has finally led to a fatal, self-inflicted wound. Let’s hope that the accused man sues the furry little bastard for everything he’s got. Hell, Shermer can set up a Kickstarter  for his legal bills — I for one would be glad to contribute.

Feminist Hyena Julia Gillard Finally Gets It In The Neck

Feminist Hyena Julia Gillard Finally Gets It In The Neck published on 2 Comments on Feminist Hyena Julia Gillard Finally Gets It In The Neck

So the men in the Labor party have finally grown some guts and thrown out Julia Gillard in favor of Kevin Rudd, the only person who stands a chance of turning an electoral apocalypse into a mere disaster. This happy event is not only good news for the lower classes of Australia in that it may spare them several years of right wing evil, it also marks the end of the Prime Ministership of a woman who will go down in history as a national disgrace.

A weakling obviously not meant for the barbaric Battle Royale that is Australian politics, Gillard’s first shameful act was to get into parliament on a women’s only seat. No slugging it out with several blokes for Gillard — oh no, being a strong and independent woman ( in the feminist meaning of those terms ) Gillard made sure all men in the Labor party were banned from competing for the seat of Lalor simply by virtue of belonging to the wrong sex. This left Gillard with only one opponent vying for the safe Labor seat, and she was such a nobody that she has not been heard from again. Not happy with stealing a seat in parliament, Gillard then proceeded to knife in the back Kevin Rudd, a man who had led Labor back in from the wilderness after a decade of conservative rule and who, while having his own flaws, is without doubt a more decent human being than the Crimson Hyena who took his job.

And who can forget the world-famous speech on misogyny? While many took this to be some sort of victory for Gillard and women everywhere, those of us with something other than porridge for brains saw it for the pack of lies that it was. Gillard, of course, knew she was lying, which is why she made the scurrilous accusations in Parliament where she was protected from a defamation lawsuit by parliamentary privilege. Nothing she gave as so-called evidence was pertinent to misogyny, and even though some of Abbott’s statements could be seen as sexist, they were certainly not in the same league as making sure members of the opposite sex can’t run for a certain seat! Not only was the famous speech a bucket of donkey spit, it was also a massive act of hatred against all men as by broadening the definition of misogyny Gillard made sure that any man who criticizes any woman ( or, indeed, any man who stands there while some other bloke holds up a sign insulting one woman) is in danger of being branded a hatemonger who would like to see half the world stuffed into a potato sack and dumped at sea.

And let’s not forget the hypocrisy of Gillard spewing a load of garbage about “misogyny” on the same day that she threw over 80 thousand single parents ( most of them women, of course ) from the single parent payment onto the paltry dole. This showed that, as is typical of powerful feminists, Gillard’s feminism is primarily about one woman, and even someone with the intellect of a wallaby with a bad case of alcohol poisoning can figure out who that woman is. As if this bit of hypocrisy wasn’t horrific enough, a week later Gillard was smiling and prancing around Afghanistan –  a truly misogynist society that jails women for being raped! Not for false accusations mind you, but in cases where the man is actually found guilty! (The reasoning is apparently that even though it was against her will the victim has nevertheless committed adultery and must therefore be punished!) Why no misogyny speeches from this Leviathan of Bullshit while in a land where the definition of a woman is roughly the same as that of a slave or a pile of dog droppings? Because deep down women don’t matter to Gillard, though she will pretend other wise when it gets her some brownie points with the she-jackals who run Jezebel.

Then there is the way she pretended that comments about her ass were the result of misogyny rather than what they actually were – namely people hassling the prime minister through whatever means they thought would draw blood. John Howard spent ten years being called short. If a couple of years of lardass jokes add up to misogyny, then what does a decade of mocking a man for his height add up to? And keep in mind, though Howard may not have been weak enough to whine about it on YouTube, men are at least as sensitive about being short as women are about having big asses – quite a few guys have a thing for big-arsed women, I have yet to meet a woman who has a thing for short-arsed men. But by labeling criticisms of female politicians misogyny, you make it harder to criticize female dirtbags than male dirtbags, giving women even more of that thing so beloved of Gillard and The Sisterhood – unfair advantage.

But perhaps the greatest of all Gillard’s sins was her refusal to step down even  after it became clear that not doing so would to lead to a political Armageddon that would destroy her party and deliver the Australian people into the hands of a government to whom Margaret Thatcher is little less than a saint. Too selfish and too weak to do the right thing, Gillard held on to office and to lies about the misogyny of her opponents till the bitter end. Not to do so would have been an admission that the affirmative action policies of Labor have failed, and while she may be willing to see her tenure go down in history as an utter debacle, she does not have the strength, the courage, nor the moral fiber to admit that she was simply not of a high enough character to take the country’s reins. No, she was willing to  allow the ship to sink into the icy depths, carrying with it millions of workers and welfare recipients, just as long as she didn’t have to admit to subscribing to a faulty ideology –  and for that act of class treachery, above all things, she deserves to rot.

So here’s to you, Julia Gillard, you worthless waste of molecules, you embarrassment to one of the finest countries in the world — get stuffed, and for fuck’s sake, don’t come back.

 

 

The Kaitlyn Hunt Matter

The Kaitlyn Hunt Matter published on 6 Comments on The Kaitlyn Hunt Matter

By now everyone knows that eighteen-year-old Kaitlyn Hunt is looking down the barrel of a lengthy jail sentence for getting all Sapphic with a girl a couple of years younger than herself.

This situation is disgusting for at least three reasons (given time, I’m sure I could find a lot more). The first is that the state thinks it is its business to tell kids that they can’t have it off with other kids. Sure, it has the legal right to do so, but as anyone with any brains knows, legal and moral aren’t the same thing and unless one party is 14 and the other is 30 the state should keep its grubby mitts out of people’s bedrooms – the stat rape laws should be there to protect kids from adults, not from one another.

The second reason this is disgusting is that if Kaitlyn were a boy she would at this very moment be in a jail cell serving a lengthy sentence and being the victim of not-so-statutory rape. The only reason there is such a shit storm over this case is that she is a female and, to a lesser extent, because she is gay and this latter fact has gotten the liberal media pissed off — it’s a confluence of good, old fashioned female privilege and a new fangled dislike for homophobia. Please, will someone give me an example of an 18 year old boy who has had sex with a girl only a couple of years younger and then been given the support of a massive online petition and gotten the opportunity to go on TV and complain about the case? Come on, just one. Hell, now that I think about it, one isn’t enough! Since hetero males greatly outnumber gay females you would have to come up with a lot more than one just to show equal treatment. Think about it, the great majority of 18 year olds charged with statutory rape are male, yet it is a member of the female minority that gets this big a fuss made over her – it’s analogous to the great majority of those charged with crack offenses in a mostly black city like Detroit being black, yet the furor erupting only in one of the few cases in which it’s a white guy caught with a crack pipe up his ass! Fact is, as badly as Hunt is being treated, things would be far darker were she not female and gay – she certainly wouldn’t have the Florida ACLU referring (albeit correctly) to her behavior as “both fairly innocuous and extremely common.” “Predatory, misogynist and an extremely common part of rape culture,” would be a more likely response from those bastards.

The third reason this pisses me off is the significant number of dumbass MRAs who think that the way to help males in Hunt’s situation is to let the state crucify their female equivalent! No, my boof-headed friends, the way to help such boys is to let Kaitlyn off the hook then agitate like mad for males to get the same leniency. Logically speaking, what some MRAs are asking for is the equivalent of trying to solve the education gap by throwing women out of college instead of bringing more men into it! And that isn’t helping anyone except, of course, those who wish to make the MRM look like it is composed primarily of men whose brains are up their asses.

Summary of the situation, including the young fool’s rejection of a plea deal, here.

I was going to link to a petition to get these absurd charges dropped, but someone has hacked the page, supposedly to make a point about security. Hacked page here.

Primary Sidebar

Secondary Sidebar