Skip to content

Feminists Do NOT Care About Aiia Maasarwe

Feminists Do NOT Care About Aiia Maasarwe published on

As anyone with an IQ higher than a haddock’s could have predicted as soon as the news hit the fan, that poor girl’s death has become the latest excuse to hate on men.

Out comes the hate speech about toxic masculinity, patriarchal this and that, men’s violence against women, and all that crap about how disrespecting The Sacred Sex puts you on the same spectrum as murdering scumbags like Codey Herrmann. We in the MRM know this is just a huge pile of well-sugared kangaroo turds, but what some of us don’t seem to know is that we ain’t the only ones. The feminists – or at least the feminist leadership — also know this. They are not nice little people making a terrible mistake while trying to make the world a better place for women, they KNOW they are lying about the causes of this violence and they do not care.

We know they know this because we are the ones who told them that they are wrong. Thanks to the advent of social media (there’s a phrase you won’t hear me say often) we are now able to partly break through the walls of the feminist echo chamber and confront them with the truth. Virtually every feminist taking to the internet and the airwaves to blame this death on patriarchy etc has had the real facts about violence waved under their upturned noses. They KNOW that the great majority of woman-killers are not patriarchal monsters in need of PC education. They KNOW that teaching boys to respect women will do nothing to stop the sick few from raping and murdering. Hell, if this turd who killed Aiia Maasarwe had been gay he would have raped and killed a boy – just like Jeffrey Dahmer did to so many! Do feminists really believe that men like Dahmer need to be taught respect for their own sex? No. They are simply not that stupid.

So if they KNOW they are talking shit, why do they not shut their shit-holes? Simple – because they do not care about women like Aiia Maasarwe, or any other woman meeting her end at the hands of some psycho. Vilifying men, not protecting women, is the primary goal. Make no mistake about that. This is why they ignore all the research showing that most men who commit domestic violence are driven by things other than the desire to oppress women. This is why they ignore the fact that DV is just as common amongst lesbians as it is amongst heterosexuals. This is why they ignore the fact that a murderous man is far more likely to kill a man than a woman. This is why when the police give the only sound advice that can be given in these cases – to stay out of dark areas in the middle of the night – they are shouted down by screeching hordes of virtue-signalling harpies.

They know they are lying, but they will continue to do so for this is what has to be done when your primary purpose is to vilify all men by putting them on a “misogyny spectrum” that starts with watching a sexy girl on TV (as in the Gillette ad) and ends with raping and murdering every woman in sight! By doing this they imply that we are all potential murderers, and this in turn – they hope – will lead to men and boys being too psychologically damaged to fight back against an increasingly gynocentric society. And if all this patriarchy-blaming leads to women implementing fake solutions to real problems, who cares? It is rarely a feminist leader who gets raped and murdered in the middle of the night by some psycho. For one thing, most of those women are too old and/or ugly to appeal to these guys, and for another they are well off and living in the safe parts of the city, often in expensive apartments guarded by – you guessed it – men! The women who end up dead are not important, for they are not part of the feminist aristocracy. They are not of the elite, and they never will be. They are mere cannon fodder in a war on men, a war which is not meant to benefit all women, but only the women that matter – the feminist leadership.