Some female turd called Claire McCaskill, who spends most of her time stinking up the US senate, has seen fit to get on TV and deliver a “PSA” telling men to shut the fuck up. Sure, she tries to make it something of a joke by telling us to shut up about some irrelevant crap. But, as is typical of feminist trash, the so-called humor is only there to hide the hatred. She, for example, makes sure to tell men to shut up about important stuff such as abortion (because women are self-impregnating, don’t you know) and religion. And on which TV show is this sexist, anti-male rant delivered? On Stephen Colbert’s show. Not surprisingly, given that unfunny jackass’s long standing habit of shitting on his own sex. As for the bitch in question, she whines about the fact that there are “only” 20 of her sister bitches in the senate (I assume she isn’t counting all the eunuchs in the Democratic party) as if this is some sort of patriarchal plot. In all honesty, I think that twenty is twenty too many, given how much female politicians like to push anti-male legislation. And you want to know why there are so “few” women in the senate? Because women suck. That’s right. And not only do women suck, but most women know that they suck, which is why they choose to vote men into office! The majority of the electorate in the US is female yet they continue to vote for males! That’s not sexism, that’s not oppression, that’s just a flash of commonsense from a group of people usually sorely lacking in said quality!

My list of what women should shut up about is, oddly, both shorter and more comprehensive than the senator’s and consists of only one word — everything. There is nothing a woman can say that can’t be said more intelligently and eloquently by a man, a man who, unlike his female counterpart, is not swimming in a sea of un-earned privilege. I need to hear the opinions of straight, white, middle class women about as much as I need to hear the opinions of Rupert Murdoch or the Koch brothers! The over-privileged are notorious for being self centered, and the probability that they will voice any but the most self-serving of opinions is very low. That’s how it is for the rich, and that’s how it is for women. So, to any straight, white, middle class woman who may have stumbled onto this site while searching for cheap shoes or discount cheesecake, I have this to say – shut the fuck up, madam, and fuck the fuck off.

Get your sexist pinhead right here.

It’s official, those beaver-humping fools up north have elected a feminist cunt. And yes, I know we all like humping beavers, but in our case they are only figurative beavers, the canucks like to fuck the actual furry, wood-chomping animal. Of course, the figurative type of beaver could also be described as a furry, wood-chomping animal…Oh, hell i’d better stop trying to explain before I get myself in deeper. Deeper in beaver, you might say…

Making it clear to everyone that his balls reside somewhere in his wife’s purse, Justin Trudeau, the country’s new head eunuch, loudly declared…

“Yes, Yes. I am a feminist. Proud to be a feminist. My mom raised me to be a feminist. My father raised me, he was a different generation, but he raised me to respect and defend everyone’s rights, and I deeply grounded my own identity in that, and I am proud to say that I am a feminist. The things we see online, whether it is issues like Gamergate, or video games misogyny in popular culture, it is something that we need to stand clearly against.”

Of course his mom raised him to be a feminist – she’s literally crazy! What his dad’s excuse is, I don’t know. Probably just being yet another pussy-whipped Western male. Trudeau the Younger also claims dad raised him to respect and defend everyone’s rights, but seems unable to see the conflict between respecting everyone’s rights and sponsoring a female privilege movement that has spent decades shitting all over men and the lower classes. I don’t know much about this guy, but I think I am getting a whiff of yet another pseudo-leftist servant of the plutocracy. The kind of clown who will defend the female privilege movement, multiculturalism, and political correctness while refusing to do anything about the ever-expanding corporate octopus.

The PM continued in what is, no doubt, a very high-pitched voice…

“I think there’s probably an awful lot of factors that come together to shape societal behaviors, certain types of music — you know, there’s an awful lot of misogyny in certain types of music, there’s issues around pornography and its prevalence now and its accessibility.”

In other words, “Black men, unlike white men, are allowed to use music to criticize The Superior Sex, and that’s something that has to stop. Also, I am deeply disturbed that the easy availability of porn makes it too easy for men to stay out from under some woman’s thumb!”

Pretty much official, then – the Canadians have thrown out a conservative cunt in favor of a feminist cunt. And can you believe the picture in the linked article? Would they have put up a picture of a female PM in a bikini? Hell, no! That would be sexist!

Click here if you want to see a male feminist getting his panties wet.

PS

I apologize for the absence of Justin Bieber references in this piece, but I couldn’t think of any that aren’t already out there. Oh, wait, here’s one…

Question – “What’s the difference between Justin Bieber and Justin Trudeau?”
Answer – “We have incontrovertible evidence that Bieber still has his bollocks!”

Heh.

Like many who realize the world is seriously fucked up, I have long taken Noam Chomsky to be one of the few credible voices on things like Amerikan imperialism. Now, I am not so certain. Today I bumped into a video in which the now highly suspect Chomsky condemns pornography as being degrading to women. He cites as evidence nothing, mentioning only that all you have to do is “take a look at the pictures.” This suggests that he has been looking at some very selectively chosen pictures, probably sent to him by some women’s studies professor at MIT. That’s his first bit of dishonesty – portraying the exception as the rule. Keep in mind, Chomsky is no fool. If he is taking the exception to be the rule, it is because he wants to do so. He is more than smart enough to wonder if these pictures are representative or not.

But then it gets worse. He actually goes on to compare women working in porn to women working in Chinese sweat shops! No way is this man too dumb to realize that there is a huge difference between the two groups. The Chinese women live in a country where you have to take what you can get to stay alive. The porn stars ( I assume he is speaking of Amerikan ones, as he is an Amerikan and the only porn he mentions is Hustler ) live in a country which is far richer and which worships youth and female beauty. A country in which a good looking young woman can get paid hundreds of dollars a week to sit behind a counter and look pretty! The women in the porn industry do what they do not because they have no choice other than to do porn or starve in the streets, but because it is easier to make thousands of dollars per day lying on your back than it is to make a hundred dollars a day working in a shop or an office. And then, in typically hysterical feminist fashion, he even brings up the fact that some Chinese women work 15 hours and day and then die in a fire! When the fuck has that happened in porn? “Porn Set Catches Fire – Dozens of Women Killed,” is a headline I have yet to read. But it gets worse, more hysterical, more dishonest – Chomsky then goes on to compare porn stars to starving children! Apparently, telling a starving child, “If you let me abuse you, I will give you food,” is analogous to telling a good looking young woman, “If you do my porn movies you will make 200 thousand a year instead of 30 thousand a year.” The sheer offensiveness of such a comparison leaves me almost speechless. Exploiting the suffering of children to make some sort of lame point on behalf of feminism? Disgusting. Truly disgusting.

But this goes beyond Chomsky’s pathetic white knighting, it goes to the heart of his credibility. The man is now a proven liar. It is that simple. Unlike many online feminists, he is not a pinhead with a degree in Wiminz Studies from some minor university. There is virtually no chance that the man is simply wrong, as opposed to lying, when he draws analogies between porn stars and starving children! This then makes one wonder what else he lies about. He is clearly willing to lie in service of the anti-porn agenda, how do we know he does not lie in service of other agendas? We do not, for, unlike Chomsky, we are not experts on international politics. For all we know, he may spout quite a lot of crap when it comes to those areas as well! In fact, we should probably assume that he does lie when it comes to other matters. Why would he think it okay to lie for the anti-porn cause but not for the Palestinian cause? Surely the latter is much more important! And if you can lie for little cause “X”, you can certainly lie for big cause “Y.”

So, yes, I have just lost my respect for Noam Chomsky. From now on I will regard him as yet another dishonest, untrustworthy pundit whose every claim is to be regarded with great suspicion – and not a little disdain.

Video below.