Skip to content

Billy Ray’s Slutty Ten Year Old

Billy Ray’s Slutty Ten Year Old published on

Miley Cyrus’ 9 year old sister Noah (yeah, ya heard me right, Noah!) has once again been slutty in public.

Said sluttiness may or may not have something to do with the not-so-innocently named “Ooh! La, La Couture” fashion line that the kid is launching, a line which may or may not be including lingerie but which is nonetheless far too slutty for such young kids.

Obviously, this kind of thing is not good for kiddies – it puts their scantily-clad bodies in a place where their minds don’t really want to follow, sets them up as pedophile bait, and teaches them that sexiness and conspicuous consumption are what life is about. Tori leader David Cameron has actually done the right thing in this case by threatening to introduce laws to deal with corporate sexualization of children, but it’s a sad state of affairs if society has to go that far to prevent something as obviously wrong as nine year olds dressing like denizens of the Playboy mansion.

And where the hell are Billy Ray Cyrus and his wife Leticia in all this? Didn’t they learn anything from the controversy generated by the risquĂ© photo shoot Miley Cyrus did a while back? Noah Cyrus is obviously too young to know what’s right and what’s wrong, Billy Ray and Leticia Cyrus are not and they should be able to see that letting their baby girl strut around dressed like a 5 dollar whore is not a good thing. But then what can you expect from a couple of people stupid enough to name a girl Noah? Of course, maybe I’m being too kind in laying the blame at the door of their stupidity – perhaps it’s their greed that deserves the blame, after all a kid this young is obviously not setting up her own company, is she now?

And just in case you thought little Noah’s only boundary problems lie in her fashion choices, check out this video of her and all her little girly friends pole dancing! Excuse me, but I have to go and throw up now


Is This Woman a Female George Sodini?

Is This Woman a Female George Sodini? published on

German woman Sabine R. didn’t like losing custody of her son to the boy’s dad, so she killed them both then set fire to the crime scene.

When her ex came round to pick up the kid, the 41 year old lawyer shot him dead then bashed and suffocated the five year old boy.

She then made her way to a hospital where she killed a male nurse before being shot to pieces by the cops, who had apparently failed to notice her tits.

On the way to said hospital, Sabine R. took shots at bystanders, most if not all of which, seem to have been male. And even once inside the hospital she seems to have ignored all the estrogen and gone straight for a male victim! How ‘bout that!

Coincidence? Or do we have a hate crime on our hands?

Since it appears that this woman wasn’t nutty enough to leave behind numerous rants against the opposite sex, and that the media isn’t likely to give the anti-male angle any serious exploration, we may never truly know what drove this scumbag. But given the preponderance of male victims this seems more likely than not to be a misandry-driven rampage on par with George Sodini’s misogynist attack at a fitness class in 2009.

Whereas the motive is not certain, one thing is – even if it does come to light that this was a case of Menocide, you won’t see anyone of consequence using this incident to make all women feel guilty. You know,  the way that Marc LĂ©pine’s rampage in 1989 was used as an excuse to set up White Ribbon Day, a day on which all us evil males are asked to promise that we won’t hurt the opposite sex, presumably because deep down we’re all just another Marc LĂ©pine waiting to happen.

More here

Picture from Bild (in German)

Hot Brainy Chick Persecuted by Loony Christians

Hot Brainy Chick Persecuted by Loony Christians published on

A Polish pop singer with the unlikely handle of Dorota Rabczewska (thankfully she is better known as Doda, presumably because even the other Poles can’t pronounce her surname) is looking down the barrel of a two year jail sentence for having offended Christian sensibilities by suggesting their favorite page turner was written by drug-addled winos! And you thought the weasels at NOW were overly sensitive.

The 26 year old Mensan made a television appearance during which she explained that the dinosaur view of history was better supported than the idea that the universe was created in six days by The Angry Old Man Who Lives In The Sky
.

“it is hard to believe in something written by people who drank too much wine and smoked herbal cigarettes.”

Not exactly a cartoon of the prophet Mohamed with a bomb in his turban, but in Catholic Poland it was close enough so the wankers had her charged under the country’s Draconian blasphemy laws.

According to  some man-child too weak to get through life without kidding himself that after it’s all over he’s going to spend eternity drinking tea and watering houseplants in god’s mansion


“It is clear that Doda thinks that the Bible was written by drunkards and junkies,” Ryszard Nowak, chairman of the ironically named Christian group “Committee for the Defence Against Sects” screamed hysterically whilst rending his garments and gnashing his teeth.

“I believe that she committed a crime and offended the religious feelings of both Christians and Jews.”

Either that or she made a slightly offensive joke. And as for offending the Jews I don’t see them filing charges, perhaps because  after centuries of persecution and inquisitions they are wary of  Christian nutters.

Though I see no point in making references to booze and weed when going on about whoever it was that wrote the bible, neither do I believe in writing laws that allow fundamentalist loons to play Christian Taliban, so let me put aside my usually tactful and diplomatic ways and say it straight – people who take the bible literally are idiots, weaklings and fools. Either that or drug-addled winos.

PS

I think she should get a pass just for being proof that not all smart women are ugly.

More here.

Caught In A Bad Romance

Caught In A Bad Romance published on

After months of diligently ignoring this Lady Gaga person, I finally got down to listening to her stuff and have found her to be both a delightful discovery and a bit of a worry.

Her music, which she apparently writes herself, is catchy, addictive and just plain exciting, but that alas is where Gaga’s virtues end. This horse-faced bastard daughter of Marilyn Manson and Madonna Ciccone differs from other pop tarts only in that she has some serious songwriting ability, a head full of intellectual and artistic pretensions, and hasn’t yet put out a sex tape.

Not only are the former Stefani Germanotta’s videos replete with the bacchanalia so beloved of contemporary youth, but like so many of today’s empty headed young women, little Stefani insists on telling us what she thinks, and what she thinks is pretty much the dark crap one would except from a girl who spent her school years being the class weirdo.

From glamorizing dysfunctional relationships in “Bad Romance”, to excusing female sexual dishonesty in “Poker Face” ( a song apparently inspired by Gaga’s habit of fantasizing about women while getting it on with men ) to declaring career to be more important than relationships (which of course marks her as strong and independent rather than as “commitmentphobic”) to her promotion of the worst aspects of gay culture, in Lady Gaga we have the embodiment of everything that is wrong with the modern feminist woman: a delusional sense of self-importance that makes Ted Turner look like a shrinking violet; an obsession with sex that makes Wilt Chamberlain look like a eunuch; and a fixation on external appearance that makes Donatella Versace look like Mother Teresa.

And yes, contrary to her previous statements, Little Ms Empty Vessel now identifies herself as “a little bit of a feminist” and is starting to spout a lot of unsurprising rhetoric such as claims that the video for “Bad Romance” is about “how the entertainment industry can, in a metaphorical way, simulate human trafficking — products being sold, the woman perceived as a commodity,” and whining about women in the music industry not being allowed to sing about sex!

Then there’s her AIDS charity work which of course is all about the wiminz, her claims that her sexuality is commented on because she is a woman rather than because her ass is constantly in everyone’s faces, and her supposed bisexuality, something which could previously have been seen as catering to male fantasies but which now takes on the covert separatist message of “I don’t need men.” Before you know it, little Stefani will  be whining about the wage gap and opening a girls-only school in Africa!

So as Mamma Ciccone gets gnarlier and older and starts to stink up the castle, the Feminist Pop Icon crown seems about to be picked up by this little chippie, and the postmodern feminist blitherings will continue for at least another twenty years. Perhaps we’ll get lucky this time, maybe Gaga will live up to her name and go mad like Britney Spears or use her very real talent to become another Kate Bush or Patti Smith, but we all know where the smart money is and as usual it is not with the sane alternative.

No doubt there are people who will say this is all harmless, that Lady GaGa is being ironic and everyone knows it, or that pop culture doesn’t have that big an impact on kids anyway.

To the former I say that a bunch of adult music critics may see her shenanigans as irony, but that the average teenager consuming Gaga’s product can’t tell the difference between postmodern irony and warm apple pie, especially not when their hormones have just been kicked into hyper-drive.

To the latter I would say that the impact of popular culture on youth can’t be overstated. Here in Australia we have wiggers, but you know what we don’t have? We don’t have black Americans, just aboriginals and a few African immigrants. Yet we have thousands of kids in Sydney who act and talk like members of a subculture that they have only ever experienced through, you guessed it, the media.

The Jacques Derrida wannabes may be able to see different layers of meaning in GaGa’s lyrics and interviews, but the intellectuals of the world aren’t a bunch of teens looking to the media for their life’s philosophy. What the ordinary teenager sees and hears from Little Ms BlahBlah is simple – get laid, get famous, be superficial, and don’t worry about who you lie to or who you cheat on, it’s all good. And that’s a message that does nobody any favors, except maybe Lady GaGa and her bank account.

In case you have no idea who i’m talking about, here’s the video for Bad Romance. At the time of writing it has been viewed over 160 million times and that’s on YouTube alone – ignore her at your children’s peril.

Chaos Reigns

Chaos Reigns published on

Having previously been tortured by Lars Von Trier’s “Dogville” and “Dancer In The Dark”, I elected to see “Antichrist” only because of the evil woman theme. Let me make this clear – Lars Von Trier is a hack. He is an Ed Wood with pretensions to Ingmar Bergman’s throne, nothing more.

In “Antichrist” however, Von Trier’s dream-inspired and depression-driven script and cinematographer Anthony Mantle’s gorgeous and hallucinatory imagery make for one of the most remarkable horror movies of the last ten years, a slab of nightmarish atmosphere not easily forgotten.

The focus of this article however, is not on the artistic merits of the movie but rather on the way it was received. I must point out that this piece is being written for those who have already seen the film. If you have not yet seen it, please stop reading now as major spoilers are included. And if you are planning to see it, beware of the scene in which the female lead gives herself an impromptu clitorodectomy – there’s also a scene where the male lead’s penis gets hit with a huge piece of wood, but alas we’re all too inured to that by now.

(Those who haven’t seen the movie are probably asking themselves what’s up with the creepy fox and the title “Chaos Reigns.” The fox is one of the animal characters, and at one point he stops eating his own guts, looks up at the male lead and in a deep, distorted voice utters the words “Chaos Reigns!”. It’s that kind of movie.)

Most of the attention the film received focused on its transgressive aspects, aspects supposedly embodied in the scenes of genital violence. This however, is the mainstream media being disingenuous – while Antichrist is an extremely transgressive film, what makes it so are not the scenes of genital violence, but rather the representation of women as evil at a time in history when women are the only sacred cows left in Western society. I think it is clear that Antichrist is a statement about female evil, not merely about one evil female. This is shown not only in the female lead’s belief that the female sex is evil, but more importantly at the end of the movie, when the husband is passed by dozens of women apparently making their way to Eden, presumably to learn whatever dark lesson his wife learnt on her previous stay.

Imagine if you will a hypothetical version of this film in which all violent acts are retained but in which it is the male sex which is portrayed as evil. Would the outrage have been there? I doubt it. Most writers for the mainstream media already believe men are violent trash, so why would there be any great outcry that Von Trier was agreeing with them? What happened with Antichrist is that a mere man stepped outside the rules and made a movie portraying women as evil. Not a woman, as in Basic Instinct or Misery, but women as a group, and it is this forbidden act of rebellion which begat the outraged reaction to the film.

Do I agree that women are evil? No, but the way the message was received is a good illustration of the cultural rules as they stand – when it comes to women, we must hear no evil, see no evil, and above all, speak no evil.