Skip to content

Giant Herbivores Terrorize Japanese

Giant Herbivores Terrorize Japanese published on 1 Comment on Giant Herbivores Terrorize Japanese

Japan is freaking out over an emerging  new social class  derogatorily dubbed “grass eating boys” because they want a quiet peaceful life, like cows in a field i guess.  

According to this slate article, Japanese research shows that “60 percent of men in their early 20s and at least 42 percent of men aged 23 to 34 consider themselves grass-eating men.”

Yes, many young Japanese men are starting to see the downside of being society’s beasts of burden and have instead decided to drop out of the rat race, stop pursuing women  and stick to peaceful pursuits like gardening and playing video games. Perhaps young Japanese men have simply seen too many of their fathers and uncles dive off skyscrapers or die from ulcers and have realized what some  western males realize too late, that achievement and status are twin piles of shit used to bully men into doing exactly what society wants them to do, which is to serve others.

If Japan is so concerned about its grass eaters it should try treating its men as human beings instead of as a bunch of  coolies whose sole purpose is to work themselves to death to buy garbage they don’t need and support families they don’t want.

I see no real negatives in this new social trend. The grass eaters get to have easy non-competitive lives, and the men who still want to work like bullocks have less competition, have greater choice when it comes to women, and hopefully their society will appreciate their hard work all the more for its rarity. In brief, I applaud these cud chewing, sandal wearing goldfish tenders and urge Western men to follow in their footsteps.

The Slate article has more weirdness to say about Japanese women than men, though. Apparently there’s a whole  genre of gay male stuff for, er women! That’s right, young Japanese women are turned on by male homosexuality – no wonder their men would rather eat grass.

Portrait of a Self Hating Male

Portrait of a Self Hating Male published on 1 Comment on Portrait of a Self Hating Male

Usually these things are written by Porky, but this one is by Michael as i was the one who posted the comment at Shamaya’s that led to this. We’ve received a response to “American Psycho Otep Shamaya wins Misandrist of the Month” and even though it’s not from the organ grinder but rather one of her monkeys it nonetheless gives me an opportunity to point out some common feminist tactics so instead of publishing it in the comments i am giving it a post all it’s own. You may wonder why i am publishing this mentally ill man’s tirade at all. Well, it’s too early for me to go out here in the Emerald City, and i thought it might be fun to do an analysis of this kind of thing so here goes. His stuff, all of it – no edits have been done – are in quotes, my response is below said quotes.

I should point out that Josh Olson is the guy who wrote A History of Violence and is also doing something or other with Ms Shamaya (whose “Confrontation” i am, ironically, listening to as i write this). Chances are of course that this man is not the actual Josh Olson, but just a coward hiding behind a famous name – i doubt the real Josh Olson has the email address “” !

Our friend starts thus…

“Of course she published it, you hydrocephalic imbecile.That’s because Otep has a sense of humor, and enjoys exposing the inane peregrinations of the mentally challenged. (Buy a dictionary, schmuck).”

Notice the use of big words. This is often done by irrational people trying to establish that they are “smart” and therefore worth listening to – usually the only difference between these people and Dan Quayle is that just before they open their mouth someone whispers in their ear “Spanish not Latin”. Also, the conclusion that my comment was published because Shamaya has a sense of humor is not valid, for even  if she rather than her webmaster chose to publish it she may have done so for a variety of reasons, we simply don’t know which. Notice also the resort to ad hominems so common amongst supporters of not only feminism but also of other types of hatred.

“Speaking as a proud member of the male gender,”

I just don’t see how a man can be proud of being so and also defend someone who thinks men are scum. Do proud gay men defend homophobes?

“I’d also like to take a moment and point out that not all of us are terrified and threatened by strong women as. ”

As what? He doesn’t say. Perhaps he couldn’t come up with a big enough word so he just left a blank space. Note also the claim that Shamaya is “strong”, you know just like a Klansman, or some skinheads kicking the crap out of a lone gay guy in a dark alley. Personally i don’t know if  Shamaya is weak or strong nor do i care, just like other hate mongers it is her spreading of bigotry that matters. The tactic here seems to be to make those of us who oppose feminist hatred look weak for doing so – when women stand up to sexism against their gender  they are strong, when men stand up to sexism against their gender they are weak. In other words, if you know i can knock you out the best thing to do is convince me that i would be a wimp to hit you back. Alas, for the feminists i’m not  hydrocephallic enough to fall for that.

“I often wonder what the source of these terrors are.”

Note the claim that i am scared. This helps to define anti-feminists as weaklings, and also distracts the audience from what i have actually expressed, which is outrage.

“Is it really as simple as having a tiny pecker? Did a woman once laugh at you during a sensitive moment?  Did your mother make you wear dresses during your formative years? Did a woman steal your job cleaning toilets at the gas station?”

Another common tactic of feminists is to attack the sexuality of any man who opposes them – it’s like their equivalent of the extreme right’s view that feminists are all dykes or fuglies who can’t get laid. As for the gas station thing, i’m not allowed to work in a gas station as both my parole officer and my psychiatrist tell me i would do well to stay away from anything that can be used to start fires.

“Or are you just another thumbless, toothless half-wit who actually believes the misogynistic rants of Rush Limbaugh come from a place of intellectual rigor, and not the simple and obvious panic of the latent (and self-loathing) homosexual?”

Note the implication that i am a right winger ( how many Rush fans aren’t?) Those who know my writings know i’m left wing on everything except feminism and multi culturalism ( and if i were a conservative i wouldn’t even oppose the latter), but amongst the mouth breathing radical left nothing is worse than a right winger, so if you want someone’s argument dismissed out of hand simply claim they are right wing. There is also a certain hypocrisy in someone who appears to be a liberal using the word homosexual as an insult – this may very well be the kind of man who is in favor of gay marriage but will call you a faggot whenever it suits him.

“Seriously, man, what drives someone to express so much anger at a group of people whose only sin is that they don’t bow and scrape before intellectual midgets, cowards and sissies?If you put half as much effort into losing your virginity as you do into lambasting strong women, you might actually enjoy life for a change.
Give it a try. You’ll thank me some day.”

And there’s another attack on my sexuality, and the repeating of the claim that Shamaya is “strong” rather than hate-filled. I do thank him though – i thank him for helping me to kill some time.

And did everyone notice what is missing in the midst of all these logical fallacies? That’s right, folks, an actual argument. Never does “Josh” say “You are wrong because of this that and the other thing”, but then how do you rationally defend  a woman who writes gendercidal crap like “Menocide”? You can’t.

I mentioned at the start that i am listening to Otep’s “Confrontation” as i write this. Amongst the lyrics in this very cool song is the all too true line “Its a rich man’s war but it’s the poor that fight.” This seems rather appropriate writing music for this post given that this man ( a member of an underprivileged group) is fighting on behalf of a woman (a member of a privileged group). Congratulations “Josh”, on being the gender equivalent of  a white man’s nigger.

PS, any response not containing valid arguments will be deleted – i don’t always get up this early. Now if you will all excuse me, i have a fire to start.

Michael Claymore

“The Menz is Scum, Kill All The Menz!”

“The Menz is Scum, Kill All The Menz!” published on

Here is another charming bit of anti-male sentiment. This piece is called Menocide (as opposed to the proper term, which is androcide, but one can’t expect such a woman to have a vocabulary much beyond that of any other brain damaged psychopath) and its lyrics were written by a poor excuse for a human female with the unlikely nom-de-guerre of Otep Shamaya, which I believe is Egyptian for “Blithering Idiot”.

Reading these lyrics I could not help but be reminded of my recent article on the Scum Manifesto, but unlike Solanas there is no evidence of an actual psychosis in this woman so I am inclined to put Ms Shamaya in the same class as Robin Morgan – a hate-filled psychopath who would be writing this garbage about blacks if her leftie friends would let her get away with it.

Here is the video and below are the lyrics.

Menocide Lyrics

we killing me
me killing me

killing me ……

infectious human waste
prostate gods


a testosterone feeding drone
multiplying, multiplying hungry clones

time to
the hive

Kill your masters!

our time has come!!!
you’re just as weak as me
but not as strong!
just as imperfect!
but twice as flawed!

i see your skin
and i hate the way
you look at me!
and softly invade
eye’m afraid!
rage intensified!

i’ll feel no fear or hate as i …
commit ….

girls in the playroom

servants in the workplace
slaves to lies!!


those who refuse to grow
we leave behind
give death to them!
with an evolved state of mind
no one’s listening
save your cries

everything they taught
was a lie
hear me now this battlecry

– what to wear
– what to eat
– what to feel
– what to think
– how to act
– how to speak
– insecure
– incomplete!!


.. apple eater!
.. deceiver!
.. protector of the way!

this is the beginning of my Liberation!
Lillith, Eve, Isis, Kali


no compassion
kill your masters!
kill your masters
kill your masters
kill your masters

Isn’t that wonderful? Find me a heavy metal song where a man says these things about women and you can pull my curly little tail for free. That’s “women”, not “a woman”- I am aware that there are a few worrisome examples of the latter, but this piece of hate-mongering is about men as a class, it is not about a particular man that “done her wrong” – indeed, it can’t be as Ms Shamaya describes herself as a lesbian. Poor dykes, as if they didn’t have enough problems already now they also have this nutter out there giving the homophobes an excuse to label them all man-haters. But I doubt Shamaya cares much about that, as her kind usually cares about only two things- herself and her bank balance.

As usual evil has its excuses. When asked on her blog if she hated men this was her response.

“i don’t see it that way. indeed, i am an emotional person and i use angry words. but they are aimed (mostly) at IDIOTS and MONGRELS.
perhaps YOU equate men with the likes of those scourge. but not me. i am an equal opportunity dispenser of rage. ha.”

And if you buy that excuse, i have a nice Opera House i would like to sell you…

The Innocent Face of Evil

The Innocent Face of Evil published on

Look at this woman. Michelle Williamson doesn’t exactly look like  a monster does she? Even in this mugshot she looks like a harmless innocent, albeit a rather thick one.

Yet this innocent-looking woman was so abusive towards her fiancée Ian McNicholl, that the poor man contemplated suicide. I guess that’s the thing with this kind of scum, male or female, they rarely look like scum, they are often either innocent-looking like Williamson or downright handsome like OJ Simpson.

And speaking of Simpson, there are only two real differences between this woman and  OJ  – she is much more sadistic, and she didn’t succeed in killing her partner, although she did give it a pretty good go. At one point Williamson hit McNicholl over the head with a TV, then repeatedly bashed him on the skull with an iron bar – if she wasn’t a small woman does anyone think this man would still be alive? Hell, if she was 5’10” and 190lb like the average American male this guy’s brains would have been splattered all over the carpet. The intent was there, but luckily for Ian it was not accompanied by the ability. The rest of the story is in this  article from The Sun, and it is not for the faint of heart, especially the bit where she pours boiling water on his genitals.

The comments are also interesting – one guy describes Michelle Williamson as a “weird woman”! I’m sorry, but would anyone refer to a man who did this kind of crap to a woman as merely “weird”? Britney Spears is weird – this woman is scum.

Details here.

When too much female privilege is not enough

When too much female privilege is not enough published on

Barack Obama, having decided that women and girls have it hard in his mean old patriarchy ( what with living longer than males, being murdered four times less often, committing suicide four times less often, going to college more often, getting lighter sentences and fines for the same crime, etc etc ) has come to the conclusion that they need something called the “White House Council on Women and Girls” to ensure that the Important Sex gets even more gravy on their roast beef than they already do now.  According to Obama, the council is meant to…

” establish a coordinated Federal response to issues that particularly impact the lives of women and girls and to ensure that Federal programs and policies address and take into account the distinctive concerns of women and girls…”

Because as we all know, the American Government doesn’t already “take into account the distinctive concerns of women and girls.”

He added in a speech filled with the usual feminist lies…

“when women still earn just 78 cents for every dollar men make”

Needless to say he didn’t point out that most of this difference is due to justifiable factors like longer hours, etc.

” when one in four women still experiences domestic violence in their lifetimes”

Again, he fails to point out that this figure is grossly inflated by a definition of violence that includes for example, shoving, and that when we use such a broad definition, one in four men will also suffer such “violence” in their lifetimes.

“when women are more than half of our population, but just 17 percent of our Congress”

Without pointing out that this is primarily because most of the people with the intellect, drive and intention to achieve these positions are men.  After all, half the population has IQs  below the average of 100, so shouldn’t we do something to get them “equal representation”?  Of course not, at least not until that 50% is composed solely of women and girls – you know, the sex that actually matters.

Along the way he adds this hypocritical gem…

“It’s a Council with a mission that dates back to our founding: to fulfill the promise of our democracy for all our people.”

Except the male ones.  One would think that a man who is half black would have looked around at the fact that it it’s black men who are slaughtered and locked up in huge numbers, not black women, much less white women, and reasoned that perhaps it is his sex that is in need of help. But ideology and reason rarely meet and Obama is clearly no exception. Now let’s get this straight,  I have no ideological objection to the Government helping those who need help, but that’s those who need help, not those who merely want it. Set up a council on Blacks, on the disabled, and yes, on men and boys, but Western women are already afloat in a bubble bath of privilege , and they don’t need any more. I think i’m going to find this guy very disappointing. I guess i bought the idea that someone seen as black would have a better feel for injustices – the real ones not the imagined ones – than a white person does, but alas the only thing Obama has a feel for is political correctness.

The details are here at

And Obama’s Executive Order is here.